Consume Product - Arete Network

Obfuscator v2.2

posted 2 months ago by PurestEvil on scored.co (+0 / -0 / )

Permalink

Download: https://files.catbox.moe/h4b8ve.zip (v2.3 now, small changes)

I've worked on it a little, and had some testing with it (on YouTube). I've added a lot of words into the blacklist, which currently is this:

"fag", "cunt", "dick", "idiot", "shit", "cuck", "simp", "fuck", "kill", "ass", "censor", "dissi", "jew", "yenta", "bank", "idf", "nigg", "coon", "negro", "black", "spic", "gay", "homo", "degen", "suicide", "tranny", "troon", "jeet", "brown", "retard", "hitler", "nazi", "natsoc", "goy", "communist", "mongrel", "race", "mixer", "rape", "groom", "sex", "genocid", "holo", "white", "atrocit", "subh", "media", "death", "murder", "extinct", "porn", "thot", "whore", "bitch", "foid", "massac"

Note: Words that contain any of those get fully obfuscated.

I had moderate success, so clearly the comments are not outright censored, but one of my comments using it was. I am not sure why - it could literally be due to its length, but bizarrely it went through (1 out of 4) when I obfuscated the entire text (all letters). I checked with an incogni window. One version was just the first 2 paragraphs, which didn't make it either. I'll write the comment below.

Other comments that used it normally with blacklist mode on went through.

So it's hard to figure out if the letters are actually parsed or not. But if they allow the entire text to be obfuscated, then just deactivating Blacklist mode might do it (it will obfuscate every vowel + a few more letters). Anyway, there are plenty of options to try around. I'll give an update when I have more certainty.

It could be semi-random as well, making it harder to assess their algorithms. Plus sometimes the comments appear with a 10-20 minute delay.

Summary of its purpose: The Obfuscator replaces letters with similar/identically looking letters that maintain readability to humans, but *may* elude censorship algorithms. Meaning you could write "FΑԌԌΟT" (this is the obfuscated result) instead of "F4GG0T" or with stars, and the censorship algorithm sees it as F????T where ? are *presumably* unknown characters.

You must log in or sign up to comment

15 comments:

Sort by:

PurestEvil on scored.co

2 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / ) 1 child

These went through (using Obfuscator):

Well, not the ones that exist today, those are usurious rats who believe they constantly trick God as they worship Satan.

---

I am glad I played Minecraft during its high, before it was ZΟԌԌΕD and infantilized beyond oblivion.

---

Also all of this are the fruits of having defeated Hіtlеr and Germany. It ends with еxtіnctіօn, OR in the best case, rаcе wars.

---

-- Some other comments went through without using the Obfuscator, and they contained words like "jews" and "brownoids." Quite weird.

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

fvckface on scored.co

2 months ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child

> they contained words like "jews"

YT doesn't censor "jews" outright because 1) there are a lot of pro-jew comments on jew-specific content and 2) a lot of pro-palestine content must be allowed to mention "jews" so the woke faggots who post shit like "gays for palestine" and "lgbt for palestine" can also spread the rest of *The Message*, even if part of it says "jews".

However, they probably use an algorithm to detect other words combined with the "jew" word to discern that which is not allowed to be said. Things like "murder", "death", "gay", "faggot", etc. Those, and others, combined with an instance of "jew" would absolutely trigger the algorithm to block the comment.

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

PurestEvil on scored.co

2 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / )

Yes, that's the reason I included those. All of those terms have reasons related to this, and through this it should be unable to parse these words or their context.

Well, theoretically at least. It is possible that they parse similar looking letters already, although it would be unlikely, or that *some* of the characters I use are parsed because they already consider them to be the same letter. And because that may trigger keywords in certain combinations, they censor the entire comment.

Maybe I have to test this directly.

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

PurestEvil on scored.co

2 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / ) 1 child

The comment that got through (but other, more timid versions didn't):

7:50 Ԝꭇօոɡ. Ιṭ ԝаṣ ṭһеṁ. Τһе ꭇеаṣօո Ηіṭᶅеꭇ еᶅеṿаṭеᶁ Ԍеꭇṁаոу ꬵꭇօṁ սṭṭеꭇ ṁіṣеꭇу іոṭօ а ԝօꭇᶅᶁ ṣսреꭇрօԝеꭇ іṣ ḅеϲаսṣе һе ḅаṣіϲаᶅᶅу ṣօᶅṿеᶁ ṭһе јеԝіṣһ рꭇօḅᶅеṁ ṣіոϲе 1933. Ηе ꭇеṁօṿеᶁ ṭһеṁ ꬵꭇօṁ рօṣіṭіօոṣ օꬵ рօԝеꭇ, ꬵіոаոϲе аոᶁ ṁеᶁіа, аոᶁ еոаϲṭеᶁ рօᶅіϲіеṣ ṭһаṭ һаᶁ ṭһе рսꭇрօṣе ṭօ ḅе ɡօօᶁ ꬵօꭇ Ԍеꭇṁаոу. Τһаṭ'ṣ аᶅᶅ. Τһе Ԝеṣṭ (ṣреаꭇһеаᶁеᶁ ḅу јеԝṣ аոᶁ ṭһеіꭇ ṁеᶁіа ṿіа рꭇօраɡаոᶁа) һаṿе ꭇаіᶅеᶁ аɡаіոṣṭ Ηіṭᶅеꭇ ṣіոϲе ṭһеո, аոᶁ ṭһеу ԝꭇօṭе аḅսոᶁаոṭᶅу аḅօսṭ һօԝ ṭһеу ԝіᶅᶅ ḅꭇіոɡ ԝаꭇ ṭօ Ηіṭᶅеꭇ іꬵ һе ԝаոṭṣ іṭ օꭇ ոօṭ. Ηօԝ ϲօṁеṣ? Ԝе ṭһօսɡһṭ Ηіṭᶅеꭇ ԝаṣ ṭһіṣ ṁаոіаϲ ԝһօ ԝаոṭеᶁ ṭօ ϲօոԛսеꭇ ṭһе ԝօꭇᶅᶁ, аոᶁ Ԍеꭇṁаոṣ јսṣṭ ṣһееріṣһᶅу ꬵօᶅᶅօԝеᶁ? Αոᶁ ṭһе јеԝṣ ԝеꭇе јսṣṭ ṭһе еṭеꭇոаᶅ, іոոօϲеոṭ ṣϲареɡօаṭṣ аɡаіո? Νօре.

Τսꭇոṣ օսṭ Ηіṭᶅеꭇ ԝаṣ аḅṣօᶅսṭеᶅу ꭇіɡһṭ аḅօսṭ јеԝṣ, аոᶁ һе һеᶅᶁ ṭһе ꭇеϲіре ꬵօꭇ ΜΑЅЅΙṾΕ рꭇօṣреꭇіṭу іո һіṣ һаոᶁ - ṭօ ꭇіᶁ а ϲօսոṭꭇу օꬵ іṭṣ раꭇаṣіṭеṣ. Τһе јеԝṣ һаᶁ ṭօ ṁаԟе ṣսꭇе ṭօ ḅꭇіոɡ ԝаꭇ սрօո Ԍеꭇṁаոу аṣ ṣօօո аṣ рօṣṣіḅᶅе, аոᶁ ṭօ ᶁеṁօոіẓе ṭһеṁ аṣ ṁսϲһ аṣ рօṣṣіḅᶅе. Τһе һօᶅօϲаսṣṭ ԝаṣ јսṣṭ ṭһе ϲһеꭇꭇу օո ṭօр ṭօ еոṣһꭇіոе ṭһе "еṿіᶅ Ԍеꭇṁаոу, ṿіϲṭіṁ јеԝṣ" ոаꭇꭇаṭіṿе ꬵօꭇ ᶁеϲаᶁеṣ аꬵṭеꭇ... ԝіṭһօսṭ іṭ ԜԜΙΙ ԝօսᶅᶁ ḅе օꬵ ոеɡᶅіɡіḅᶅе іṁрօꭇṭаոϲе. Ԝօꭇṣе еṿеո - реօрᶅе ṁіɡһṭ ᶅօօԟ іոṭօ іṭ ꭇаṭіօոаᶅᶅу, еṿеո ϲօոṭеṁрᶅаṭіոɡ Ηіṭᶅеꭇ'ṣ ṁаṣṣіṿе еϲօոօṁіϲ-ϲսᶅṭսꭇаᶅ ṣսϲϲеṣṣ, аոᶁ ṭһе ꭇօᶅе օꬵ ṭһе јеԝ.

Τһе ꭇеаṣօո ԜԜΙΙ ṣṭаꭇṭеᶁ іո 1939 ԝаṣ ḅеϲаսṣе Ρօᶅаոᶁ ṁаṣṣаϲꭇеᶁ Ԍеꭇṁаոṣ іո օϲϲսріеᶁ Ɒаոẓіɡ. Ιṭ ԝаṣ ϲᶅеаꭇ ṭһеу ԝіᶅᶅ ḅꭇіոɡ ԝаꭇ սрօո Ԍеꭇṁаոу օոе ԝау օꭇ аոօṭһеꭇ, аոᶁ ᶅеṭṭіոɡ Ԍеꭇṁаոṣ ɡеṭ ṁаṣṣаϲꭇеᶁ іո һօреṣ ṭօ ɡаіո ṁօꭇе ṭіṁе іṣո'ṭ ꬵеаṣіḅᶅе. Τһе іᶁеа ԝаṣ ṭօ ꬵօꭇϲе Ԍеꭇṁаոу іոṭօ ԝаꭇ, ṣօ ṭһаṭ ṭһе јеԝіṣһ ṁеᶁіа рꭇօрһеϲу (օꬵ 6 уеаꭇṣ) օꬵ еṿіᶅ Ԍеꭇṁаոу ԝаոṭіոɡ ṭօ ϲօոԛսеꭇ ṭһе ԝօꭇᶅᶁ ԝօսᶅᶁ ϲօṁе ṭꭇսе. Ɒսе ṭօ аᶅᶅіаոϲе ṁеϲһаոіϲṣ, іṭ ԝօսᶅᶁ ᶁꭇаɡ Βꭇіṭаіո аոᶁ Ḟꭇаոϲе іոṭօ ԝаꭇ аɡаіոṣṭ Ԍеꭇṁаոу аṣ ԝеᶅᶅ. Βսṭ ꬵօꭇ ṭһаṭ Ԍеꭇṁаոу һаᶁ ṭօ ḅе ṭһе օոе ᶁеϲᶅаꭇіոɡ ԝаꭇ.

Τһеո Ŗսṣṣіа јօіոеᶁ іո, ṣօ ṭһеṣе օһ-ṣօ ṣօᶅіᶁ аᶅᶅіаոϲе ṁеϲһаոіϲṣ јսṣṭ ᶁіᶁո'ṭ һарреո ԝіṭһ ṭһеṁ. Ԝһу? Βеϲаսṣе іṭ ԝаṣ ᶅօոɡ рᶅаոոеᶁ ṭօ һаṿе ԝаꭇ ԝіṭһ Ԍеꭇṁаոу, ṭօ ᶁеṣṭꭇօу ṭһеṁ. Ŗսṣṣіа'ṣ іոṭеꭇеṣṭ ԝаṣ ṭօ һаṿе ṭһе "ϲаріṭаᶅіṣṭṣ" еẋһаսṣṭ еаϲһ օṭһеꭇ аոᶁ ṭһеո ṣԝօօр іո аոᶁ ṭаԟе Εսꭇօре. Ԝһіϲһ ṭһеу раꭇṭᶅу ᶁіᶁ, ԝһіϲһ рꭇօṿеᶁ Ηіṭᶅеꭇ ꭇіɡһṭ օոϲе ṁօꭇе. Ηе ꬵօսɡһṭ аɡаіոṣṭ Ŗսṣṣіа ṭօ рꭇօṭеϲṭ ΑḶḶ օꬵ Εսꭇօре ꬵꭇօṁ ṭһе ϲօṁṁսոіṣṭ рᶅаɡսе, аոᶁ Ԍеꭇṁаո іոṭеᶅ ṣаіᶁ ṭһеу ԝеꭇе 3 ԝееԟṣ аԝау ꬵꭇօṁ ṣṭаꭇṭіոɡ ԝаꭇ аɡаіոṣṭ Ԍеꭇṁаոу - еṿеո іꬵ іṭ ԝаṣ а ꬵаᶅṣе рꭇеᶁіϲṭіօո, ṭһаṭ ԝаṣ ṭһе ꭇеаṣօո.

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

TallestSkil on scored.co

2 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / ) 1 child

Your lower case f and r don’t render correctly on an iPhone or iPad. That remains incredibly strange to me, because Apple tends to have the most robust Unicode support.

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

PurestEvil on scored.co

2 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / ) 1 child

This is the character list I use. Could you look how many of those are not properly rendered?:

```a = { 'а', 'ą', 'ɑ', 'ạ' };
b = { 'ḅ' };
c = { 'ϲ' };
d = { 'ᶁ' };
e = { 'е', '℮', 'ẹ' };
f = { 'ꬵ' };
g = { 'ɡ', 'ց', 'ꬶ', 'ḡ' };
h = { 'һ' };
i = { 'і', 'ï', 'ı', 'ị', 'ỉ' };
j = { 'ј', 'ϳ' };
k = { 'ԟ' };
l = { 'ᶅ' };
m = { 'ṁ' };
n = { 'ո' };
o = { 'օ', 'ọ' };
p = { 'р' };
q = { 'ԛ' };
r = { 'ꭇ', 'ṙ' };
s = { 'ṣ', 'ʂ' };
t = { 'ṭ' };
u = { 'ս', 'ǔ', 'ṳ', 'ụ' };
v = { 'ṿ', 'ⱱ' };
w = { 'ԝ' };
x = { 'ẋ' };
y = { 'у', 'ỵ', 'ỿ' };
z = { 'ẓ' };

A = { 'Α', 'А' };
B = { 'Β', 'В', '₿', 'Ƀ' };
C = { 'С' };
D = { 'Ɒ' };
E = { 'Ε' };
F = { 'Ḟ' };
G = { 'Ԍ', 'Ḡ' };
H = { 'Η', 'Н' };
I = { 'Ι', 'І', 'Ӏ' };
J = { 'Ј', 'Ј' };
K = { 'Κ', 'Ԟ' };
L = { 'Ḷ' };
M = { 'Μ', 'М' };
N = { 'Ν' };
O = { 'Ο', 'О', 'Օ' };
P = { 'Ρ', 'Р' };
Q = { 'Ԛ', 'Ꝗ' };
R = { 'Ŗ', 'Ɍ', 'Ꞧ' };
S = { 'Ѕ', 'Տ' };
T = { 'Τ', 'Т' };
U = { 'Ụ' };
V = { 'Ṿ' };
W = { 'Ԝ' };
X = { 'Χ', 'Х' };
Y = { 'Υ' };
Z = { 'Ζ' };

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

TallestSkil on scored.co

2 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / ) 1 child

Absolutely. Here’s how it appears in [macOS](https://i.postimg.cc/449bXMnw/Screenshot-2026-07-13-at-4-21-31-PM.png), and here’s how it appears in [iPadOS](https://i.postimg.cc/dtFdwVzN/IMG-E4655.jpg). For some reason, the Mac has the r glyph while the iPad is missing both r and f.

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

PurestEvil on scored.co

2 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / ) 1 child

Thanks, I've replaced them:

f = { 'ẝ', 'ϝ', 'ʄ', 'ғ', 'ӻ' }; // 'ꬵ' does not work on phones.

r = new char[] { 'г', 'ṙ', 'ɾ', 'ɍ', 'ґ' }; // 'ꭇ' does not work for phones.

As info, non-aggressive mode uses the first letter, which I picked to be the most readable, and without "all letters" it replaces only vowels and a few more (not f). I didn't find a good f. I also worked on the vowels... and the H.

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

TallestSkil on scored.co

2 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / ) 1 child

Perfect. All your new options work flawlessly.

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

Continue thread...

TallestSkil on scored.co

2 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / ) 1 child

“Holo” cannot possibly be shadowbanned on its own because of the sheer number of Pokémon card videos and comments out there. “White,” “black,” and “brown” similarly can’t possibly be shadowbanned. It has to be contextual with those. Mongrel would block dog videos. “Media” and “extinct” have to also be contextual.

> Meaning you could write "FΑԌԌΟT" (this is the obfuscated result) instead of "F4GG0T" or with stars, and the censorship algorithm sees it as F????T where ? are presumably unknown characters.

What happens when the system starts shadowbanning all “unknown” characters, though?

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

PurestEvil on scored.co

2 months ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child

> “Holo” cannot possibly be shadowbanned on its own

Holocaust, Holodomor are likely both in their keyword list. You don't need to use the tool when talking about mundane topics.

> “White,” “black,” and “brown” similarly can’t possibly be shadowbanned

Someone else mentioned it - it's about the context. Or rather gathering various keywords. Take "black" and have other keywords like "crime", "statistics", "horrible", "mongrel", etc. "Brown" is meant for brownoid, which I like to use. "White" may cause the comment to be still flagged political, especially if capitalized.

> “Media” and “extinct” have to also be contextual.

I had trouble getting the simple message through (without the tool) that jews own 96% of media. Combine "jews", "media", "own" or "run", and that may be enough.

> What happens when the system starts shadowbanning all “unknown” characters, though?

That requires them to react to the tool, which will only be known if used sufficiently. That one comment I mentioned that consisted purely of weird characters went through apparently, so it doesn't seem to have happened yet. The exploit will only be known and addressed if it's prevalent enough.

But they can't really ban unknown characters though... they have to enable all characters for all languages. They have a built-in comment translator.

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

TallestSkil on scored.co

2 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / ) 1 child

>Holocaust, Holodomor are likely both in their keyword list.

I guarantee it. But they can’t *just* block any use of ‘holo’ alone because that would also block ‘innocuous’ things. Like Holocene and holomorphic.

>Take "black" and have other keywords

>Combine "jews", "media", "own" or "run", and that may be enough.

Which tells us that their systems are annoyingly sophisticated...

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

PurestEvil on scored.co

2 months ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / )

Well, they really took their time to maximize their censorship capabilities. By using keywords and evaluating a value based on their usage, they might roughly infer context. But if you'd write something like "the jews aren't usurious parasites" it wouldn't pick up the negation, just "jews", "usurious", "parasites" and deem it bad.

It doesn't have to be sophisticated either, just err on the side of censorship.

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co

KyleIsThisTall on scored.co

2 months ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )

Www.qaz.wtf

Permalink Reply

Mirrored from scored.co