New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
36
Consoom Climate Change Myth (media.scored.co)
posted 1 month ago by USSDefiantJazz on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +36Score on mirror )
You must log in or sign up to comment
19 comments:
12
KyleIsThisTall on scored.co
1 month ago 12 points (+0 / -0 / +12Score on mirror ) 1 child
And that's with the official thermometers being at ground level on the tarmac of international airports.
LesboPregnancyScare on scored.co
1 month ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
with the constant jet wash.

this is also why the media stated the covid lockdowns reduced climate change.
10
fvckface on scored.co
1 month ago 10 points (+0 / -0 / +10Score on mirror ) 1 child
26 years of Globohomo Climate Warnings, and still 44 of 50 states have not warmed to the idea of a hotter July.

*"We gotta pump those numbers up, those are rookie numbers in this racket."*

*"Ok, let's use AI to kill >50% of all American jobs in the next 5 years by building data centers in every state that pump heat, noise, and EMF into the environment!"*
bobbacringo on scored.co
1 month ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
EMF is a localized phenomena. Your data centers are all running their equipment at 480vac or 415vac. Which has a limited electro magnetic field.
fvckface on scored.co
1 month ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
The server stacks themselves produce very little EMF, but:

- Data centers require far more electrical consumption than similarly-sized commercial developments, especcially their 24/7/365 cooling requirements.

- They require substations on or in close proximity to the development site

- They require large high-voltage transmission lines that many other conventional commercial sites simply do not, because they can often utilize existing infrastructure. Data centers cannot.

- They have complex back-up generator systems that also produce EMF, and even when not needed they are consistently run at regular intervals to prevent complete failures and data loss risks.

- Many/most also have on-site transmission towers or clusters of transmission equipment.

It's not about how much EMF a server stack produces, it's about how much EMF pollution the entire development produces.

Fun fact, EMF fluctuations consistently disrupt pollinators ability to forage, navigate, pollinate, and even control their basic motor functions.

The frogs may or may not be gay, but the bees are needed for a whole lot more than just honey.
bobbacringo on scored.co
1 month ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
The substations would be the culprit in your example. Once things get to transformation, they no longer are a EMF concern.


buck-breaker on scored.co
1 month ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
They've kinda given up on it because it's too hypocritical even for normies given the massive data center / surveillance state rollout elites are betting on
covok48 on scored.co
1 month ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
“But climate change is making Muslim preteens marry 38 year old men!”
detransthrowaway on scored.co
1 month ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
SLIGHTLY misleading. This graphic is for ONLY the month of July.
Trasheconomy on scored.co
1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 2 children
Do you not think that billions of humans farming and consuming billions of animals and burning billions of gallons of unnaturally occuring substances may have some affect on the environment?
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
1 month ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror ) 1 child
About as much as billions of bison processing megatons of biomass into hydro carbons.
Trasheconomy on scored.co
1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
No not really. There are way more cows and pigs producing methane now than there ever were bison. Add on to that burning fossil fuels equivalent to massive eruptions every year, yeah I think ther might be some effect
TiredDad on scored.co
1 month ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 2 children
Human is accountable for 10% of total CO2 in the atmosphere, which make up 0.4% of the air composition.

A single volcano burb produces more CO2 than the entire human race burning fossil fuel in a year.

Yeah mate, I don't buy that it's my fault.
fvckface on scored.co
1 month ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Just want to add that the richest concentrations of CO2 in the atmosphere almost always correlate with the greenest areas of plant production.

~~Brawndo~~ CO2, it's got what plants crave!
Trasheconomy on scored.co
1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
It's not *your* fault. But industrial powers beyond your understanding or comprehension have turned the world into a machine of consumption that dissociates you from God's world. The wild world. The one where you are the animal with free will. The whole point of this board, ya know?
KyleIsThisTall on scored.co
1 month ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
In a localized area.

But they are claiming GLOBAL warming, which just is not true.
Trasheconomy on scored.co
1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
I think that it's entirely plausible that after 100 years of industrialization, burning fossil fuels, and stressing ecosystems with toxins and deforestation, we might be having a global effect.
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
>after 100 years

>might

Tell you what. Let's wait another hundred years and see if we actually notice any changes.
Trasheconomy on scored.co
1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
I have in my life time seen noticable changes in weather patterns.
Toast message