Yup. Now they can point, and say “see, it’s not just us, and this is totally NoRmAl”.
Just another reason why I laugh when people tout muh first amendment. 🤣 Same goes for the second amendment, and well, all the rest now too.
I don’t even make fun of other conquered countries anymore because we’re just a slightly different flavor of the same thing, and lagging behind by about five years.
it was already enacted and specifically mentioned antisemitism.
this is just an amendment to add hinduphobia to the already [existing law](https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/title-50/chapter-1/section-50-1-12/).
in either case the law is meaningless. it directs state agencies to make these specific considerations when determining if certain criminal enhancements should apply.
technically the law is, in and of itself, an overt act of discrimination, dictated to the administration by the legislature. if you sued them and it reached federal court it would be struck down.
9 hours ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
One day, talking bad about the Hindus will get your tongue cut out.
"Ancient texts like the Manusmriti (Laws of Manu) did prescribe extreme corporal punishments—including mutilation (such as cutting out the tongue) or execution—for lower-caste individuals (Shudras) who insulted or challenged Brahmins"
> Atlanta's suburbs have some of the fastest-growing Hindu populations in the entire nation.
Diversity (poojidiots) versus diversity (niggers). When is the race war between the two going to start? Are poojidiots going to get Idi Amin'd out of Atlanta, or are niggers going to get reverse Idi Amin'd instead?
And what will be the fate of mixed breeds, the Okechukwu Patels and the Sukhdeep Ogunyankinnus?
Just another reason why I laugh when people tout muh first amendment. 🤣 Same goes for the second amendment, and well, all the rest now too.
I don’t even make fun of other conquered countries anymore because we’re just a slightly different flavor of the same thing, and lagging behind by about five years.
this is just an amendment to add hinduphobia to the already [existing law](https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/title-50/chapter-1/section-50-1-12/).
in either case the law is meaningless. it directs state agencies to make these specific considerations when determining if certain criminal enhancements should apply.
technically the law is, in and of itself, an overt act of discrimination, dictated to the administration by the legislature. if you sued them and it reached federal court it would be struck down.