Consume Product

I just checked, he did. It's a fine assessment, but it's the product of it's time. The atheists to that time were largely jews, communists and liberals, and as such were driven by ideology. The religious jews might be worse than the atheist ones, but it's a tough competition. Even atheist jews may resent Whites and Christians simply for historical reasons.

But to get to the point OP wants to make: No, morality does not necessitate belief. But people who are atheists require philosophy to acquire proper moral frameworks, otherwise they can become selfish, parasitic, dysfunctional.

By baseline however there is not much difference - the primary reason for commit unethical deeds isn't even based on views. In fact, views are rather taken as a rationalization of one's actual will.

The best example is the nigger. The nigger is inherently more aggressive, of low intelligence, of low impulse control. The reason niggers go feral nigger mode isn't due to some conviction, but because it's genetic.

We do not commit heinous deeds because we instinctually, genetically, (thus) cultural do not have a drive for that. We value living together peacefully and value cooperation highly. To brownoids more often than not it's a case of "if I steal/defraud/rape/murder, will I get away with it?" (niggers don't even think long-term, they are just muh' dick and go).

The reason ALL OF US are not raving lunatics stealing, raping, looting and murdering whenever we can is because we are genetically, socially predisposed not to want that. It does not require some kind of belief or conviction. However that may find its limits when it comes to rather mundane (but still nasty) things like stealing something little from public places or littering.

This also raises the question of what free will is if we are all programmed to be in a certain way. I personally have some anger issues that can reach murderous rage. Turns out, my grandparents were like that too. Other men seem to be calm incarnate. So is my attitude some kind of moral choice or a matter of conviction? Actually no. The same way I didn't choose my intellect, the same way I didn't choose my body height, the same way I didn't choose to have a bone structure that makes me sink in water like an anchor.

If I were groomed and molested in my youth by a pedophile faggot, I would have a choice to accept having been a victim or cope my entire life that I wanted it all along. But alas, I never had it occur to me, so I didn't have to make that decision. I didn't have to muster will power, conviction or any thinking for it. The same goes for most people.

That doesn't mean free will doesn't exist. But if you are not aware of your own being, you are like an NPC following its script. It also doesn't mean you *have* to be certain ways and that you can use these as absolute excuses - unforeseen things can happen, you may take risks, you may make mistakes, good things may happen and you work towards certain outcomes. Ironically the amount of "free will" you have is dependent on your predetermined bodily setup and economic-societal status...

The point is, if you live in a way where you believe you have no free will, that you cannot alter your life in meaningful ways, that's a problem.

Speech 26 April 1933 made during negotiations leading to the Nazi-Vatican Concordat of 1933; from Ernst Helmreich (1979). The German Churches Under Hitler. Detroit: Wayne State University Press. p. 241