It’s a movie made by Uwe Boll. That guys is a known German scammer and grifter, I think he’s funny but you can’t take any of his works seriously.
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
34 comments:
And if that's all it was, I wouldn't care.
But I keeps seeing "WE'RE BACK BROS! Migrants are back on the menu, Jews seething, LET'S GOOOOO" from people who I thought would know better by now.
But I keeps seeing "WE'RE BACK BROS! Migrants are back on the menu, Jews seething, LET'S GOOOOO" from people who I thought would know better by now.
Yes, thank you.
I get that people are desperate for something to latch on to, but this is just trash as a movie *and then* it's got a trash message, too.
What even is it? "Kill a bunch of random people that piss you off on the way to the bordello to help you deal with the stress of being a millionaire real estate mogul"? Totally relatable...
I get that people are desperate for something to latch on to, but this is just trash as a movie *and then* it's got a trash message, too.
What even is it? "Kill a bunch of random people that piss you off on the way to the bordello to help you deal with the stress of being a millionaire real estate mogul"? Totally relatable...
> millionaire real estate mogul
That ruined the whole thing more than anything. He's supposed to be an "everyman" character, but he's actually a millionaire with no real stress in life. Nothing he does is any sacrifice or danger to himself. It's not like he decided to quit his job to get vengeance; or struggle to keep his day job while being a vigilante at night. There's nothing there for the target audience to relate to on a basic level.
Also, he's an American in Europe, so it's not like he's tied to the land or even the city. Why does he care? Why do all that in Europe rather than in America? Boll doesn't care and likely never thought about any of these things. The whole movie is cheap bait to capitalize on the public's obvious frustration with the rapefugee invasion of Europe. Boll doesn't deserve one dime or dollar for that kind of slop.
That ruined the whole thing more than anything. He's supposed to be an "everyman" character, but he's actually a millionaire with no real stress in life. Nothing he does is any sacrifice or danger to himself. It's not like he decided to quit his job to get vengeance; or struggle to keep his day job while being a vigilante at night. There's nothing there for the target audience to relate to on a basic level.
Also, he's an American in Europe, so it's not like he's tied to the land or even the city. Why does he care? Why do all that in Europe rather than in America? Boll doesn't care and likely never thought about any of these things. The whole movie is cheap bait to capitalize on the public's obvious frustration with the rapefugee invasion of Europe. Boll doesn't deserve one dime or dollar for that kind of slop.
For me, it's not so much about something to latch on to, as I think it's good to acknowledge what it gets right. It presents the demographics of who is committing the violence and rape in Western countries accurately and doesn't shy away from making that a firm perspective of the film.
>and then it's got a trash message, too. What even is it? "Kill a bunch of random people that piss you off on the way to the bordello to help you deal with the stress of being a millionaire real estate mogul"? Totally relatable...
This is one of my main issues with the film as well... The protagonist isn't relatable to the common man. Who is the one experiencing and identifying that these are our biggest problems. I credit Boll's autism and his lifestyle as a rich degenerate filmmaker for him being out of touch in this regard.
I, however, do think the end line of the movie delivers a message that I believe is important...
>This film is dedicated to the thousands of rape victims in Europe who were betrayed by our legal system.
>and then it's got a trash message, too. What even is it? "Kill a bunch of random people that piss you off on the way to the bordello to help you deal with the stress of being a millionaire real estate mogul"? Totally relatable...
This is one of my main issues with the film as well... The protagonist isn't relatable to the common man. Who is the one experiencing and identifying that these are our biggest problems. I credit Boll's autism and his lifestyle as a rich degenerate filmmaker for him being out of touch in this regard.
I, however, do think the end line of the movie delivers a message that I believe is important...
>This film is dedicated to the thousands of rape victims in Europe who were betrayed by our legal system.
>presents the demographics of who is committing the violence and rape in Western countries accurately
No, it doesn't, and this is one of my biggest problems with it.
Who commits the rape in the movie? A Muslim kid (so BASED) and his *checks notes* multi-ethnic friends? Because British kids are being indoctrinated into raping their own by Muslim culture?
Who *actually* rapes girls? Grooming gangs of mostly Pakistanis who target girls because they're White (not muh short skirt). It's not kids dragging girls into bushes, it's full grown men luring girls with drugs into government subsidised flats and then raping them until they couldn't possible show their face in society, locking them into sexual slavery.
It completely reframes the problem of anti-White cultural warfare as "Muslims bad"; a classic Jewish trick. You see tons of this in "based" circles; somebody is all about re-migration, a homeland for British people etc, but when you start naming the Jew you realise that they aren't actually on your side, they just hate Muslims.
Then there's the kids on the bus. Two White kids and their pet jiggaboo. No, we know how this goes, there are whole subs dedicated to chimp outs; it's not White kids, it's Blacks.
The guys at the bar are (alledgedly) Jewish, but that's never mentioned and still not really the least of the problem. It comes off as "rape culture" nonsense.
All of these things take something that the Boll knows "everyone" is mad about and gently twists it into something fantastical. That's what this movie is: hate porn. But it's done as though the director doesn't know what boobs look like so they CGI butts onto people's chests. It's a fever dream.
>I, however, do think the end line of the movie delivers a message that I believe is important...
Of course you do! The majority of Whites agree with you, and Boll knows it. That's how they pander to you; we all want *someone* to come out and say it so they have an "outsider" (read: degenerate retard) become the spokesperson. Then they discredit him to make everyone else feel stupid.
No, it doesn't, and this is one of my biggest problems with it.
Who commits the rape in the movie? A Muslim kid (so BASED) and his *checks notes* multi-ethnic friends? Because British kids are being indoctrinated into raping their own by Muslim culture?
Who *actually* rapes girls? Grooming gangs of mostly Pakistanis who target girls because they're White (not muh short skirt). It's not kids dragging girls into bushes, it's full grown men luring girls with drugs into government subsidised flats and then raping them until they couldn't possible show their face in society, locking them into sexual slavery.
It completely reframes the problem of anti-White cultural warfare as "Muslims bad"; a classic Jewish trick. You see tons of this in "based" circles; somebody is all about re-migration, a homeland for British people etc, but when you start naming the Jew you realise that they aren't actually on your side, they just hate Muslims.
Then there's the kids on the bus. Two White kids and their pet jiggaboo. No, we know how this goes, there are whole subs dedicated to chimp outs; it's not White kids, it's Blacks.
The guys at the bar are (alledgedly) Jewish, but that's never mentioned and still not really the least of the problem. It comes off as "rape culture" nonsense.
All of these things take something that the Boll knows "everyone" is mad about and gently twists it into something fantastical. That's what this movie is: hate porn. But it's done as though the director doesn't know what boobs look like so they CGI butts onto people's chests. It's a fever dream.
>I, however, do think the end line of the movie delivers a message that I believe is important...
Of course you do! The majority of Whites agree with you, and Boll knows it. That's how they pander to you; we all want *someone* to come out and say it so they have an "outsider" (read: degenerate retard) become the spokesperson. Then they discredit him to make everyone else feel stupid.
>Who commits the rape in the movie? A Muslim kid (so BASED) and his checks notes multi-ethnic friends? Because British kids are being indoctrinated into raping their own by Muslim culture?
I don't know where you are getting this interpretation. The gang that raped the White girl were all mudslimes and nons? What is the problem? I didn't see any of them as ethnically British or European.
>Then there's the kids on the bus. Two White kids and their pet jiggaboo. No, we know how this goes, there are whole subs dedicated to chimp outs; it's not White kids, it's Blacks.
Again, this is not what I saw at all. I saw a mongrel non-White, a nigger, and a mudshark. All infected by obvious ghetto nigger behavior and I think that was presented pretty well.
>It completely reframes the problem of anti-White cultural warfare as "Muslims bad"; a classic Jewish trick.
You're over thinking it. Boll noticed something he doesn't like and he knows a lot of others don't as well. Muslim rapists. That's about as far as his noticing has gotten.
>Who actually rapes girls? Grooming gangs of mostly Pakistanis.
And the other assorted mudslimes from ex Soviet block countries, North African, and Middle Eastern shitholes. Which I think who the gangster vaguely Slavic looking guys were supposed to be that he kills? I agree the film could have been more accurate in depicting the specific perpetrators.
>It comes off as "rape culture" nonsense.
Agreed. It's not what the film should be focusing on.
>All of these things take something that the Boll knows "everyone" is mad about and gently twists it into something fantastical.
In a sense that is true. But what can also be true is that for many the hints of reality that are present are irrefutable and inescapable.
>That's how they pander to you; we all want someone to come out and say it so they have an "outsider" become the spokesperson.
I don't care about anything like that. I care about it pissing off the right people and waking up a few more normies. It's doing that.
>That's what this movie is: hate porn. But it's done as though the director doesn't know what boobs look like so they CGI butts onto people's chests. It's a fever dream. (read: degenerate retard)
Well, yeah... It's Uwe Boll. Thanks for your replies. I actually enjoy discussing this film more than I ever thought I would. So it's done something right in the sense that it's gotten people talking about it. And was banned as you pointed out.
I don't know where you are getting this interpretation. The gang that raped the White girl were all mudslimes and nons? What is the problem? I didn't see any of them as ethnically British or European.
>Then there's the kids on the bus. Two White kids and their pet jiggaboo. No, we know how this goes, there are whole subs dedicated to chimp outs; it's not White kids, it's Blacks.
Again, this is not what I saw at all. I saw a mongrel non-White, a nigger, and a mudshark. All infected by obvious ghetto nigger behavior and I think that was presented pretty well.
>It completely reframes the problem of anti-White cultural warfare as "Muslims bad"; a classic Jewish trick.
You're over thinking it. Boll noticed something he doesn't like and he knows a lot of others don't as well. Muslim rapists. That's about as far as his noticing has gotten.
>Who actually rapes girls? Grooming gangs of mostly Pakistanis.
And the other assorted mudslimes from ex Soviet block countries, North African, and Middle Eastern shitholes. Which I think who the gangster vaguely Slavic looking guys were supposed to be that he kills? I agree the film could have been more accurate in depicting the specific perpetrators.
>It comes off as "rape culture" nonsense.
Agreed. It's not what the film should be focusing on.
>All of these things take something that the Boll knows "everyone" is mad about and gently twists it into something fantastical.
In a sense that is true. But what can also be true is that for many the hints of reality that are present are irrefutable and inescapable.
>That's how they pander to you; we all want someone to come out and say it so they have an "outsider" become the spokesperson.
I don't care about anything like that. I care about it pissing off the right people and waking up a few more normies. It's doing that.
>That's what this movie is: hate porn. But it's done as though the director doesn't know what boobs look like so they CGI butts onto people's chests. It's a fever dream. (read: degenerate retard)
Well, yeah... It's Uwe Boll. Thanks for your replies. I actually enjoy discussing this film more than I ever thought I would. So it's done something right in the sense that it's gotten people talking about it. And was banned as you pointed out.
>I didn't see any of them as ethnically British or European.
>I saw a mongrel non-White, a nigger, and a mudshark.
>But what can also be true is that for many the hints of reality that are present are irrefutable and inescapable.
*You* are the one headcannoning things because you *want* this movie to be based. It isn't. It's a midwit hate porn, at best.
You have an idea in your head, which maybe the majority of Whites share, that Boll is trying to exploit. But, because he's a total hack, he doesn't actually come close to understanding *anything* he's talking about and he sure as hell doesn't *beleive* any of it.
At best, he's playing alienated Whites for money. At worst, this is demoralisation.
Either way, it's a test to see if people can think critically when faced with bespoke propaganda.
>I saw a mongrel non-White, a nigger, and a mudshark.
>But what can also be true is that for many the hints of reality that are present are irrefutable and inescapable.
*You* are the one headcannoning things because you *want* this movie to be based. It isn't. It's a midwit hate porn, at best.
You have an idea in your head, which maybe the majority of Whites share, that Boll is trying to exploit. But, because he's a total hack, he doesn't actually come close to understanding *anything* he's talking about and he sure as hell doesn't *beleive* any of it.
At best, he's playing alienated Whites for money. At worst, this is demoralisation.
Either way, it's a test to see if people can think critically when faced with bespoke propaganda.
>You are the one headcannoning things because you want this movie to be based.
That is how it looked to me? Call it my head cannon if you want. I think many see it the same as I have. The film doesn't have to explicitly line out the perfect version of your own ideological views, one for one, to have based true elements, my friend.
>At best, he's playing alienated Whites for money. At worst, this is demoralisation. Either way, it's a test to see if people can think critically when faced with bespoke propaganda.
Maybe so. I don't think there is anything so nefarious at work here. I think it's touched a nerve for some reason with many here because it comes close to presenting the reality that we want to expose, but doesn't go the full measure into presenting what they believe it should.
Again, that's because of who made it. Not because there is anything clandestine at work here, I believe. I look at this film akin to something like American History X, Romper Stomper or The Order.
These films were intentionally made to be propaganda against our ideology and to denigrate the people in our movement. You may be correct in assuming these are the same intentions with Citizen Vigilante. However, I think all those films inevitably became adopted by our guys for the kernels of truth present within them and eventually benefitted our purposes more than they ever did the subversives who created them. Just ask Tony Kaye how he feels about American History X.
That is how it looked to me? Call it my head cannon if you want. I think many see it the same as I have. The film doesn't have to explicitly line out the perfect version of your own ideological views, one for one, to have based true elements, my friend.
>At best, he's playing alienated Whites for money. At worst, this is demoralisation. Either way, it's a test to see if people can think critically when faced with bespoke propaganda.
Maybe so. I don't think there is anything so nefarious at work here. I think it's touched a nerve for some reason with many here because it comes close to presenting the reality that we want to expose, but doesn't go the full measure into presenting what they believe it should.
Again, that's because of who made it. Not because there is anything clandestine at work here, I believe. I look at this film akin to something like American History X, Romper Stomper or The Order.
These films were intentionally made to be propaganda against our ideology and to denigrate the people in our movement. You may be correct in assuming these are the same intentions with Citizen Vigilante. However, I think all those films inevitably became adopted by our guys for the kernels of truth present within them and eventually benefitted our purposes more than they ever did the subversives who created them. Just ask Tony Kaye how he feels about American History X.
As I've said before, the ONE "based" scene that keeps getting clipped is literally at the end of the movie.
Everything before it is absolute bullshit!
Everything before it is absolute bullshit!
it's uwe boll. he's never made a good movie.
the protagonist is not a pristine white knight of christian virtue. he's far more real... the increasing trend of functional autists turning into chads unwittingly.
see what happens in modern society is that it's run by subverters who are backed and protected by much larger groups of fucking delusional hysterics. pretty much the only two groups of people who live in objective reality are functional autists and chads. as society gets more and more delusional, the functional autists simply lack the brain chemistry to bend over for delusion and comically become *almost* indistinguishable chads simply by standing ground. i say *almost* because you still have to have an ounce of masculinity. just being a sperg who doesn't bend over for the faggotry of the day isn't enough to get people to follow you.
the protagonist is not a pristine white knight of christian virtue. he's far more real... the increasing trend of functional autists turning into chads unwittingly.
see what happens in modern society is that it's run by subverters who are backed and protected by much larger groups of fucking delusional hysterics. pretty much the only two groups of people who live in objective reality are functional autists and chads. as society gets more and more delusional, the functional autists simply lack the brain chemistry to bend over for delusion and comically become *almost* indistinguishable chads simply by standing ground. i say *almost* because you still have to have an ounce of masculinity. just being a sperg who doesn't bend over for the faggotry of the day isn't enough to get people to follow you.
Yes, the American international multimillionaire real estate mogul in Europe who takes a stand against the evils of... Whites on the bus not paying the fare and Whites using date rape drugs in a commoner night club and fucks brownoid prostitutes in a brothel he owns is far more real. Also every normal every day man has a tattoo of the hebrew letter aleph.
The one word I would *not* use to describe this movie is "real".
Also, I fucking hate this "making the protagonist morally ambiguous equals good writing" thing. It's a lazy hack to allow the writers to not create an actual character, which inevitable results in trash media.
If you can't create a compelling story around a good man trying to live in a corrupt world without corrupting him as well, you're useless as a writer.
Also, I fucking hate this "making the protagonist morally ambiguous equals good writing" thing. It's a lazy hack to allow the writers to not create an actual character, which inevitable results in trash media.
If you can't create a compelling story around a good man trying to live in a corrupt world without corrupting him as well, you're useless as a writer.
Thanks for saving me the time
The kids causing trouble on the bus were a mixed mongrel, a nigger and a mud shark. I saw one of the date rape roofie guys in the club as an obvious heeb.
The sex scene was very degenerate and obliviously put there because Uwe likes boobs in his films. The film would have been much better off without it.
Most every person depicted in the film as a degenerate criminal, rapist or immigrant invader is black, brown or mixed. That's more accurate to our reality than you're going to get from anywhere else in the pop culture entertainment industry.
I think we're trying to over analyze the intentions behind making the film too much. Instead of looking at it more simply for what I believe it to be... A fatigued sperg-out from an eccentric filmmaker.
Boll has always liked to be edgy and has probably become more aware of the ever persistent reality & circumstances we are all surrounded by. I don't think he thought about the film as much as he was just angry and also wanted to be spoken of again. I think Boll has undiagnosed autism as well.
The sex scene was very degenerate and obliviously put there because Uwe likes boobs in his films. The film would have been much better off without it.
Most every person depicted in the film as a degenerate criminal, rapist or immigrant invader is black, brown or mixed. That's more accurate to our reality than you're going to get from anywhere else in the pop culture entertainment industry.
I think we're trying to over analyze the intentions behind making the film too much. Instead of looking at it more simply for what I believe it to be... A fatigued sperg-out from an eccentric filmmaker.
Boll has always liked to be edgy and has probably become more aware of the ever persistent reality & circumstances we are all surrounded by. I don't think he thought about the film as much as he was just angry and also wanted to be spoken of again. I think Boll has undiagnosed autism as well.
>I think we're trying to over analyze the intentions behind making the film too much.
If it was a nothingburger, they wouldn't have bothered banning it...
If it was a nothingburger, they wouldn't have bothered banning it...
They still would out of sheer pettiness and spite. AfD is pure kosher nationalism and they want it banned anyway.
I think I saw that it's been the number one movie sold or rented on Amazon since it released.
So even more evidence that it's known of and even pushed by the establishment.
It's banned, but it's pushed...?
I'm failing to see the evidence suggesting as you believe that there's a grand conspiracy or subversive element intentionally and/or actively at play here?
What's the purpose do you think in an establishment, like Amazon, pushing this film? I think it's more likely that many people simply heard about a banned film and were compelled to see it for that reason and the easiest place to do so was renting it from Amazon.
I'm failing to see the evidence suggesting as you believe that there's a grand conspiracy or subversive element intentionally and/or actively at play here?
What's the purpose do you think in an establishment, like Amazon, pushing this film? I think it's more likely that many people simply heard about a banned film and were compelled to see it for that reason and the easiest place to do so was renting it from Amazon.
yep, I watched it and it's merely propaganda to release tension through fantasy while also programming Whites to accept these jew lies.
Toast message
wOw sO bAsEd, wE dId iT mY fElLoW gOyS, wE wOn, nOw lEtS dO nOtHiNg
Edit: thank you for sharing, I’m glad not everyone is praising this suspicious “banned” movie.