Obviously you can't do that about ideological matters. Not even 9/11. I pushed the limits by talking about Hitler and NS Germany, and it confirmed essentially what I said, but reluctantly. When it came to jews, it shut down and refused to answer.
But this? Virology is not an ideological matter, neither is flat Earth. And you can literally observe viruses with an electron microscope, just as you can observe other things. The fact that it differs and that there is consistency means it properly depicts *something* that is actually there.
> Great, something is there. Well, maybe it's just artifacts
What do you expect to see on that level? They are 20-400 nm in diameter, meaning 0.02-0.4 µm. Bacteria are 0.2-5.0 µm. The size difference between viruses and bacteria is roughly a factor of 10-100. That's like an ant to an elephant.
Whatever you see at that level of zoom is doomed to be weird. But not random artifacts. [These](https://www.utmb.edu/virusimages/the-virus-images) have visible characteristics and are distinguishable from each other.
Let's just assume they are not just dabbling around like total buffoons and selling you the first image they made. Let's assume there is a solid process behind it to make sure what they conclude is actually valid.
> Anyway, is that something exogenous? Does it cause disease?
Given that these things can and have been identified, it is safe to assume they are exogenous and not a normal occurrence in a human body.
Signed, not a flat-earther.
But this? Virology is not an ideological matter, neither is flat Earth. And you can literally observe viruses with an electron microscope, just as you can observe other things. The fact that it differs and that there is consistency means it properly depicts *something* that is actually there.
What do you expect to see on that level? They are 20-400 nm in diameter, meaning 0.02-0.4 µm. Bacteria are 0.2-5.0 µm. The size difference between viruses and bacteria is roughly a factor of 10-100. That's like an ant to an elephant.
Whatever you see at that level of zoom is doomed to be weird. But not random artifacts. [These](https://www.utmb.edu/virusimages/the-virus-images) have visible characteristics and are distinguishable from each other.
Let's just assume they are not just dabbling around like total buffoons and selling you the first image they made. Let's assume there is a solid process behind it to make sure what they conclude is actually valid.
> Anyway, is that something exogenous? Does it cause disease?
Given that these things can and have been identified, it is safe to assume they are exogenous and not a normal occurrence in a human body.