Not only does he make valid points, i'm trying to find something he said that is worth arguing over. And i like to argue just for the sake of argument. Steele2 made good points so what is all the controversy about?
My impression was "yes, Muslims are a dangerous enemy, but rather than pointlessly antagonise them with foreign wars (while, for some reason, allowing them to mass migrate into *our* countries) we should be treating them with respect, as dangerous enemies, especially because we have other, much worse, enemies, that we could unite against".
Frankly, that's been my stance since 9/11, at least. These people aren't afraid to die to score mere propaganda victories. Why are we fucking with them? It's not for oil; we already have tons. Even if it was, why are we not working *with* them, rather than trying to overthrow their governments?
Jews. That's why. That's the enemy, and it's worth noting that the Zionists are the ones pushing the most anti-Muslim stuff.
My impression was "yes, Muslims are a dangerous enemy, but rather than pointlessly antagonise them with foreign wars (while, for some reason, allowing them to mass migrate into *our* countries) we should be treating them with respect, as dangerous enemies, especially because we have other, much worse, enemies, that we could unite against".
Frankly, that's been my stance since 9/11, at least. These people aren't afraid to die to score mere propaganda victories. Why are we fucking with them? It's not for oil; we already have tons. Even if it was, why are we not working *with* them, rather than trying to overthrow their governments?
Jews. That's why. That's the enemy, and it's worth noting that the Zionists are the ones pushing the most anti-Muslim stuff.