Explain to me where in an inoculate equaling a throat swab of someone immersed in 2ml of milk, 100 u/mi Penicillin, 50 mg/ml Streptomycin, then sample centrifuging it at 5450 rpm for almost an hour then putting it with a culture medium of bovine amniotic fluid, beef embryo extract, horse serum, antibiotics and phenol red is a "virus?" Wait, you don't know basic science? What a fucking retard.
It's more that you *cannot* because I understand basic science and you don't. If you did, you would know viruses don't exist. And clearly, you don't have anything better to do than take constant Ls from me every single day you initiate. Your failures actually serve God to show why thinking like you is wrong and thinking like me is right. Thanks!
2 hours ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
> It's more that you cannot because I understand basic science and you don't.
Look, you make a lot of decent posts, but don't think you aren't the village clown. At best there are like 2 people who share your views here - scientifically illiterate midwits at best. To everyone else your bullshit is just ignored.
> than take constant Ls from me every single day
It's just pitiful. 95%+ of people encounter you with pity, ridicule and annoyance. I am just the messenger, you can continue to delve in your delusions all you want - you'll do so anyway.
I just felt pity (again) that nobody tells you, and instead just avoids you, just so that they don't have to talk with you. Because, expectedly, you will respond in an aggressive way. And there is no point in debating you, because you are absolutely fanatical. You wouldn't compromise even 1% to anything. So why bother? And who has time for that? What's the point?
Go ahead, make a post to prove one of your theories. See what responses you'll get. Or if you'll get any at all. Do you best to prove your points, demonstrate the depth of your knowledge and intelligence.
I believe in bacterium. But not sure about virus being a vector for infectious disease. There's lots of good theories that viral scamdemics are hoaxes or that viral transmission itself is false theory. I think those theories are persuasive.
Correct. STDs don't exist. You do exchange toxins, though. And most "herpes" is just skin friction damage from low collagen and other problems during the activity. You will never find any evidence of a herpes "virus," or a study showing "contagions."
Do you *honestly* think I have nothing better to do?
Look, you make a lot of decent posts, but don't think you aren't the village clown. At best there are like 2 people who share your views here - scientifically illiterate midwits at best. To everyone else your bullshit is just ignored.
> than take constant Ls from me every single day
It's just pitiful. 95%+ of people encounter you with pity, ridicule and annoyance. I am just the messenger, you can continue to delve in your delusions all you want - you'll do so anyway.
I just felt pity (again) that nobody tells you, and instead just avoids you, just so that they don't have to talk with you. Because, expectedly, you will respond in an aggressive way. And there is no point in debating you, because you are absolutely fanatical. You wouldn't compromise even 1% to anything. So why bother? And who has time for that? What's the point?
Go ahead, make a post to prove one of your theories. See what responses you'll get. Or if you'll get any at all. Do you best to prove your points, demonstrate the depth of your knowledge and intelligence.
So I can fuck the whore with herpes? It won't spread? Lol I don't believe you enough to risk it.