You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
10
devotech2 on scored.co
5 hours ago10 points(+0/-0/+10Score on mirror)2 children
Non-sequitur. It's mostly anglos who blatantly supported all of these things without any thought given to the consequences of what would happen to europe. Of course the diaspora leaving the middle east would have no thought given to wherever they went. Which the voters supporting all of this in the anglosphere didn't give a fuck about all throughout the 00s-10s. I'm not saying that westerners broadly deserved it for supporting everything, but that (again, mostly Americans and the rest of the anglosphere) put the cart before the horse and decided the fate of everyone while asking for the consent of nobody. Once again. Do even the UK and the US deserve to be overrun because it's people were fucking stupid and in a lull throughout that time? No, definitely not. But still, *what did you expect?*
You can't say "well I wholeheartedly support my governments decision to support the islamist association of rape, destruction, and violence against the evil dictator" and then turn around and say "oh my God! Why are they enacting rape, destruction, and violence against europeans?"
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed.
5 hours ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)1 child
Where were all the sand niggers before approximately the collapse of the soviet union then? Oh right, there werent any because they weren't fucking moving here lol. I wonder if any outside circumstances caused *that* to happen
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
Your logic is fucking flawless. Country X does something in country Y. Therefore countries L, M, N, O, P must except infinity sand nigger migration from countries Y, J, K, F, Q, V, and 1-10. But definitely those people shouldn’t be moving to a country adjacent to Y.
3 hours ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
If a nigger is arrested for theft, and is let out on bail, and then steals again, who's fault is it?
Are you going to try to endlessly rehabilitate the nigger? Or is there a point where your leaders, who you support with money and action, need to do their job?
The nigger walks into the house with the unlocked door. The sand nigger walks into the country with the open border (which, in many cases, was part of the so-called "Coalition of the Willing" that made their own country uninhabitable).
Why did we (Whites) allow the door to be left open?
2 hours ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
> who you support with money and action, need to do their job?
Hold your horses. The "leaders" of our countries are subverted, so do not assume it's *all* people who want it to happen. In fact, most of the time it didn't even matter what you vote. Hitler was quite explicit about this - because that too happened during his time (and he was the exception to the rule).
Nowadays "radical" parties do not even get into power at all. You cannot even vote for them.
So just think what a person who doesn't want to be fucked with via politics can do. NOTHING. He just lives his life, seeks a job, craft or career, wants a family, and wants to retire. That's *it*. Traitorous politicians and jews capitalize on this standard ambition of every person - which is valid - nobody should care about politics. The fact that we *need to* is a bad sign.
I wish I wouldn't have to care about politics - no faggotry, no niggers, no brownoids, no to low corruption. Instead we are caught in this eternal goose-chase.
It's always a problem generationally downstream. It's their children and their children who pay the price. And to be fair, we have this issue for 2 millennia because we didn't eradicate the jew once and for all. Instead people wanted to be "nice" and get to heaven by being good goys, so they expelled jews to an insane amount, but required extraordinary evidence and moral justification to execute them. So they were just kicked out most of the time, alive, to be another country's problem, or even that of their children a while later.
The jewish problem got never solved, and look where it lead us to - we are facing literal extinction in 100-200 years. The movie "No Country For Old Men" has an excellent quote for that:
"If the rule you followed brought you to this, of what use was the rule?"
Apply this in an large-scale analogue way: If being "nice" and merciful lead you to this, facing extinction, what good did that to you? The antagonist said this to a guy who was paid to kill him, but got caught, failed and got killed.
And to answer: It's a terrible rule. Being "nice" and merciful are major mistakes. Continue this path, and you (generic you) may witness your children and their children get gang raped and murdered, or jailed for "racism." Take Britain as one possibility of what it can lead to.
You can't say "well I wholeheartedly support my governments decision to support the islamist association of rape, destruction, and violence against the evil dictator" and then turn around and say "oh my God! Why are they enacting rape, destruction, and violence against europeans?"
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
Are you going to try to endlessly rehabilitate the nigger? Or is there a point where your leaders, who you support with money and action, need to do their job?
The nigger walks into the house with the unlocked door. The sand nigger walks into the country with the open border (which, in many cases, was part of the so-called "Coalition of the Willing" that made their own country uninhabitable).
Why did we (Whites) allow the door to be left open?
Hold your horses. The "leaders" of our countries are subverted, so do not assume it's *all* people who want it to happen. In fact, most of the time it didn't even matter what you vote. Hitler was quite explicit about this - because that too happened during his time (and he was the exception to the rule).
Nowadays "radical" parties do not even get into power at all. You cannot even vote for them.
So just think what a person who doesn't want to be fucked with via politics can do. NOTHING. He just lives his life, seeks a job, craft or career, wants a family, and wants to retire. That's *it*. Traitorous politicians and jews capitalize on this standard ambition of every person - which is valid - nobody should care about politics. The fact that we *need to* is a bad sign.
I wish I wouldn't have to care about politics - no faggotry, no niggers, no brownoids, no to low corruption. Instead we are caught in this eternal goose-chase.
It's always a problem generationally downstream. It's their children and their children who pay the price. And to be fair, we have this issue for 2 millennia because we didn't eradicate the jew once and for all. Instead people wanted to be "nice" and get to heaven by being good goys, so they expelled jews to an insane amount, but required extraordinary evidence and moral justification to execute them. So they were just kicked out most of the time, alive, to be another country's problem, or even that of their children a while later.
The jewish problem got never solved, and look where it lead us to - we are facing literal extinction in 100-200 years. The movie "No Country For Old Men" has an excellent quote for that:
"If the rule you followed brought you to this, of what use was the rule?"
Apply this in an large-scale analogue way: If being "nice" and merciful lead you to this, facing extinction, what good did that to you? The antagonist said this to a guy who was paid to kill him, but got caught, failed and got killed.
And to answer: It's a terrible rule. Being "nice" and merciful are major mistakes. Continue this path, and you (generic you) may witness your children and their children get gang raped and murdered, or jailed for "racism." Take Britain as one possibility of what it can lead to.