I will give you possible futures based on what will happen over the following years and decades. Note that these are predictions, so it's unclear what will happen, but there are still logical processes. Also there are unforeseeable events possible, but they are completely unpredictable. Covid is an example of something that basically comes out of nowhere (a damn lab leak).
Option 1: The current development continues, right-wing activity remains too small. This means the EU will continue to import 3rd world brownoids, they distribute them into every country in Europe, Britain becomes an even more tyrannical dystopia, the ratio of non-Whites increases in the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand. While right-wing emergences occur, they are too late and too small. In 100 years the ratio of Whites is around ~1% of the world population, but that's the most optimistic view. In reality, countries that fall to brownoids will become extremely hostile towards Whites, and they will accelerate murdering us. Thanks to Democracy, brownoid-favoring parties will be in charge most of the time, and the most radical right-wing parties will want to cut down the massive funneling of money and resources from Whites to nons a tiny bit.
Option 2: Over the next years or decades, people get aware of the jewish problem enough to gain political power. But thanks to Democracy, the effects are quite mitigated and timid. Countries will seek to deport recent illegal migrants, which will have a process spanning years for all cases. Things improve slightly, stopping the trend of continuous decline. The jews will only be opposed to a lesser degree - only insofar it relates to israel. The outcome is still unchanged from option 1: In 100 years we are close to extinction.
Option 3: People realize that you cannot vote your way out of this, and it will be enough to start civil wars with their governments. It will be a time of conflicts across White countries, and the worse it got, the more heated the fights. Whites do not really win, as they stand against White ZOG armies who protect the system. It will be like Ukraine, where things continue to function in Kiev, ZOG agendas are pushed, but somehow men are sent to die in the war. The importation of brownoids continues, mass surveillance increases, but there are enclaves of people who reject it. It's a messy world, the lines are blurred, most people are interested in their luxuries continuing to function (heating, sanitation, electricity, internet, grocery shops). The resistance is not enough, but while the ZOG fraction gets inundated with brownoids, there will be White-only enclaves all over the place, and they aren't using excuses to keep it that way, they will be openly, proudly racist. In 100 years, Whites will be ~4% of the world population.
Option 4: Same as option 3, but the people turn overwhelmingly racist, notice, and win. The governments couldn't withstand the onslaught of people turning against them. Those who revolt also applied violence to a high degree, going after jews, traitors, brownoids with lethal means. The media screeched and crying, but they weren't spared either. The new government ended the 3rd world immigration project, they removed non-Whites (non-natives) from positions of finance, influence and power. Projects like "foreign aid" ended, the Climate Change agendas too, Covid was seen as a surge of tyranny they opposed, but weren't listened to. The goal was to restore a 100% ethnic homogeneity in all White countries. In fact, the goal was aligned across most countries, and as it lead to massive prosperity, it inspired other countries to follow the same path as well. All along the jews were the biggest resistance against it, and the population was inundated with the brownoids still in the country. Votes have been made to the populations, and the overwhelming outcome is that they wanted jews and brownoids gone at all costs - only a minority wanted more peaceful solutions, and even less wanted to do nothing. The governments followed this will, and engaged in diplomatic negotiations with countries to deport them there - but it failed. They did not want them back, so the only outcome was to put them into camps. From there on they either died, got executed or got deported - but no matter what, jew/brown -> camp. As it occurred, people also realized how irrational the holocaust was (aka fake), because this time it was a real extermination program, and it was nothing like that. Actually realistic procedures, not some gas chamber trickery, or electric swimming pools, or death masturbation machines, or overfed eagles and bears. In 100 years, Whites will be ~20% of the world population. Consider that ending feeding Africans will lead to mass starvation events, which will be highly appreciated by everyone involved.
Option 1: The current development continues, right-wing activity remains too small. This means the EU will continue to import 3rd world brownoids, they distribute them into every country in Europe, Britain becomes an even more tyrannical dystopia, the ratio of non-Whites increases in the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand. While right-wing emergences occur, they are too late and too small. In 100 years the ratio of Whites is around ~1% of the world population, but that's the most optimistic view. In reality, countries that fall to brownoids will become extremely hostile towards Whites, and they will accelerate murdering us. Thanks to Democracy, brownoid-favoring parties will be in charge most of the time, and the most radical right-wing parties will want to cut down the massive funneling of money and resources from Whites to nons a tiny bit.
Option 2: Over the next years or decades, people get aware of the jewish problem enough to gain political power. But thanks to Democracy, the effects are quite mitigated and timid. Countries will seek to deport recent illegal migrants, which will have a process spanning years for all cases. Things improve slightly, stopping the trend of continuous decline. The jews will only be opposed to a lesser degree - only insofar it relates to israel. The outcome is still unchanged from option 1: In 100 years we are close to extinction.
Option 3: People realize that you cannot vote your way out of this, and it will be enough to start civil wars with their governments. It will be a time of conflicts across White countries, and the worse it got, the more heated the fights. Whites do not really win, as they stand against White ZOG armies who protect the system. It will be like Ukraine, where things continue to function in Kiev, ZOG agendas are pushed, but somehow men are sent to die in the war. The importation of brownoids continues, mass surveillance increases, but there are enclaves of people who reject it. It's a messy world, the lines are blurred, most people are interested in their luxuries continuing to function (heating, sanitation, electricity, internet, grocery shops). The resistance is not enough, but while the ZOG fraction gets inundated with brownoids, there will be White-only enclaves all over the place, and they aren't using excuses to keep it that way, they will be openly, proudly racist. In 100 years, Whites will be ~4% of the world population.
Option 4: Same as option 3, but the people turn overwhelmingly racist, notice, and win. The governments couldn't withstand the onslaught of people turning against them. Those who revolt also applied violence to a high degree, going after jews, traitors, brownoids with lethal means. The media screeched and crying, but they weren't spared either. The new government ended the 3rd world immigration project, they removed non-Whites (non-natives) from positions of finance, influence and power. Projects like "foreign aid" ended, the Climate Change agendas too, Covid was seen as a surge of tyranny they opposed, but weren't listened to. The goal was to restore a 100% ethnic homogeneity in all White countries. In fact, the goal was aligned across most countries, and as it lead to massive prosperity, it inspired other countries to follow the same path as well. All along the jews were the biggest resistance against it, and the population was inundated with the brownoids still in the country. Votes have been made to the populations, and the overwhelming outcome is that they wanted jews and brownoids gone at all costs - only a minority wanted more peaceful solutions, and even less wanted to do nothing. The governments followed this will, and engaged in diplomatic negotiations with countries to deport them there - but it failed. They did not want them back, so the only outcome was to put them into camps. From there on they either died, got executed or got deported - but no matter what, jew/brown -> camp. As it occurred, people also realized how irrational the holocaust was (aka fake), because this time it was a real extermination program, and it was nothing like that. Actually realistic procedures, not some gas chamber trickery, or electric swimming pools, or death masturbation machines, or overfed eagles and bears. In 100 years, Whites will be ~20% of the world population. Consider that ending feeding Africans will lead to mass starvation events, which will be highly appreciated by everyone involved.
Yes, but we also learned from it. Once someone from our ranks emerges, he will not play along and knows how to inject unexpected contingencies which they will struggle to deal with, or cause them to rile up the population against them. Hitler did well in this regard (with the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact), and if the US wouldn't have intervened, Europe from be under NS-rule (ideologically) and the Soviet takeover of Eastern Europe would have never occurred.
Once you know your enemy, to what he is capable of, and understand it, you can defeat it. Outsmarting them is not the issue, that's easy. Someone who is competent just has to do it.
> Why are we allowed to discuss these things? Why release the epstein files? Why create a report about rape gangs in the UK? Why am I allowed to make this comment?
Because they do not have full control, and do not need to. They just have to make sure most of the cogwheels that matter turn in their favor.
> Desensitization.
That is also a tactic, but it can backfire. If there a Hitler v2.0 emerges, and openly talks about this, he will get huge support from the population. The demoralization caused by desensitization only lasts as long as there is an outlook to make things right, a hope.
And not only that, all that desensitization will backfire on them. After all we have seen that is done to our people, what do you think what level of cruelty we are capable to conjure upon them? TND & TKD will be the MINIMUM, and the public discourse will be what is the ideal. They brought this upon themselves.
> will people actually stand up for the things they believe in, or will they continue to let themselves be pawned by this rootless neoliberal international.
If a Hitler v2.0 emerges who thinks alike, I'd 100% support him, even with the risk that he is a traitor (like Trump). People voted for Trump because he pretended to be a fraction of him, and that was 10 years ago. Today, after Covid and all the revelations that came out, people want more.
If someone would say "I will remove all non-Whites in this country, and with me, this charade of a Democracy will end", he would literally get a LOT of support by now, in many countries. The publicity he'd get from the jewish media would be immense too (as they try to denounce him).
They've paved the way for this. And if that person is eloquent enough to make the point to the public, and smart enough not to fall for their tricks, he'd get even more support. Of course he'd be the enemy of every government, the jews and brownoids, but guess what, if he has an army of people willing to kill and die to keep him safe, ZOG cannot physically stop him easily. Assassination attempts are all that is left.
There is an alternative of course: Terror.