The official narrative is that Germany just decided to be the personification of evil because Hitler took power, and the people just went along, because Whites are racist, gullible and stupid. And they took jews as a scapegoat, because they are oh-so amazing, and they were jealous of their amazingness. Obviously, this is all nonsensical propaganda, and imposed upon us which we are supposed to accept unquestioned. If you don't, you must be evil or so stupid that you fell for Hitler's propaganda too. Let's get out the truth, which is basically the inversion of the narratives.
After WWI Germany was in shambles economically and culturally. They were defeated, subjugated and impoverished, with a level of degeneracy that is on a nightmarish level. Child prostitution, transgenderism, rampant homosexuality - and all to survive to the next day because of hyperinflation. Every day all the money you had became practically worthless. The reparations imposed upon Germany had its effects on the Germans. And a part of Germany was handed to Poland as well. Remember, Germany didn't lose WWI that hard as to justify these grave concessions. In fact these peace negotiations were highly questionable as well - whoever lead it from the German side either did a terrible job or intentionally made it as bad as possible.
The jews were a major center piece in all of this. It was jews who were the leading communists, who lead a communist revolution in Germany 1918, which was defeated. They lead the Bolshevik revolution in Russia. It was jews who were the main drivers behind degeneracy, with the Institut für Sexualwissenschaften lead by Magnus Hirschfeld (jew) being notorious. They were in positions where they lived royally while Germans struggled to make it through the day, even doing things like eating in the open and laughing at the Germans' struggles.
The political parties were notorious for being feckless and ineffective. They did nothing to alleviate the problems, and even make them worse (just as today). Then came the NSDAP and Hitler, and they delivered what they promised: Radical changes to end hyperinflation and degeneracy. They removed non-Germans (jews) from positions of finance, power and influence. They replaced the currency with a new one unrelated to the Rothschild's central banking system that today runs across the world. Germany rose from a miserable, hopeless state into a global superpower within mere years. The reason Germans liked Hitler is *because* he did all the right things to lead Germany to that.
However, with that they made 2 inexcusable offenses to the world jewry: 1. They arrested and humiliated a Rothschild, and 2. they overthrew the jewish death grip on Germany and it blossomed into prosperity. In 1933 the jews publicly (in Western media) declared that Germany must be destroyed, that Hitler has to be stopped at all cost, that Hitler will get his war if he wants it or not. These things further radicalized over time. Hitler knew about this, he knew that war would come over Germany, and that Germany must prepare for it. Indeed 1938 Poland occupied Czechoslovakia to provoke Germany (as it was their ally), and 1939 they massacred Germans in occupied Danzig (the land taken away from Germany was still inhabited by mostly Germans). This forced Hitler's hand.
Why would Poland do something like this? They had an alliance with Britain and France. For the very purpose to be used against Germany, so that when Germany was inevitably provoked into war with Poland, all those nations would attack Germany. And Poland was lead by jews, so they were inline with the global interests to bring war upon Germany, no matter what. To them, dead Polish soldiers and an occupied Poland wouldn't be an issue.
Hitler knew all this, this is exactly what the Allies wanted. So he made a pact with the Russians, the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact, to crush Poland from both sides. The western half would go back to Germany, as it was prior to WWI, plus an extra. But it was essential that Germany had to declare war first, that they had to be provoked into doing so. The narrative the jews pushed internationally was that Germany was taken over, that Nazis are evil and that they oppressed jews (for no reason at all of course). And when Hitler finally attacked Poland, with a glee on their face, they announced how they were right all along. No mention of the massacre of Germans in occupied Danzig.
The thing they didn't count with was that Russia would join in. This confused the West severely. Even to them the Russians were an unknown factor. But nevertheless, they followed the plan: They declared war on Germany, but NOT on Russia. Remember, it was an alliance - they should have declared war on Russia, but didn't. They ONLY wanted war with Germany.
So the wars started. France was overran, Britain was kept in check. However it was a pact with Russia - it was clear to Hitler that they were waiting for the "capitalists" to exhaust themselves, so that they could swoop in and take over Europe. When Germany attacked the Soviets, it was when they expected the Russians to attack Germany in 3 weeks. Even if that wasn't the case, they operated on limited knowledge, and with the given intel, they concluded that that would happen. And striking first is better than letting the Russians prepare themselves - indeed the Germans had major successes. And Russia conquering Eastern Europe *proves* Hitler right about Russians - that is what they wanted to do all along.
Enemies from within were put into camps. The communists (political degenerates), the homosexuals, the transvestites, the liberals, the usurers, the enemies of Germany - all those who would weaken Germany *again*, cause misery to it, cause sabotage or provide information to the enemies. As it turned out, most of those were jews. Being jewish was not a criteria to be put into camps, but somehow there was a very strong correlation of being a negative element in society and being jewish. These kind of patterns can be observed widely in many areas, across time, so it's nothing extraordinary. Hitler wanted to put them into camps for one more reason: To reform them by having them do physical labor for each other. Their camps had all sorts of accommodations: Hospitals, nurseries, swimming pools, theaters to name some. It could have worked, but due to war, supply line disruptions and typhus epidemics (for which Zyklon B was used for), things turned sour. The Swiss Red Cross examined the camps, and came to the conclusion that 271000 died in them. Not intentionally, mind you. Way more Germans died in the world war. In fact, there was a sheet that compared religious adherents 1936 and 1948, and while Christians decreased by ~15%, jews remained at ~0%.
After WWII ended, they tried to create the Germans-exterminated-jews narrative, but it failed. Soldiers recognized that some of the photos they've shown were of the Allied bombings of Dresden, which had the purpose to kill as many German civilians as possible to "demoralize the Nazis." Yes, these war crimes were indeed demoralizing, and the Allies were quite ford of them. In fact, there is Eisenhower's Holocaust, who was a jewish general tasked to handle Germany. He pushed through a semantic-legal doctrine that declared German prisoners of war and civilians not as "prisoners of war", who had to get basic accommodations (like not being starved to death) with another term. Through that, he managed to kill millions of Germans after WWII.
Note that the Holocaust didn't exist yet. Nobody who wrote about the war around that time ever mentioned it, nor was it in the lexicon. In fact it took the jews until ~1960 to develop it, to rewrite the camps Germany had into the "Holocaust." They edited photos to do things like 2 German soldiers laughing for a photo into a jew hanging in the background. It turned a mundane, nice moment into some atrocity. They also used various footage of Allied atrocities as evidence. They even made a photo-shoot in 1947 in the camps, all with the right costumes. It aligned well with the groundwork that has been laid out before - the wartime propaganda, and the "denazification" programs (which were political persecutions against Germans, and reeducation programs). Up until that time, jewish lead and created communist nations including the Soviet Union have killed tens of millions of Christians. The Soviet Union's NKVD, which lead the pipeline of arresting people, forcing confessions, putting them into labor camps to eventually die, consisted of 85%+ jews. It was a jewish genocide against White Christians. The Holodomor in Ukraine had a death toll of 5 million, with cynical messages like "don't eat your babies!" as they stripped the population of all food supplies they could. The Ukrainians hated the Russians, which lead them to join the Germans and see them as liberators.
It was of highest importance for the world jewry to depict Germany as the ultimate evil and racist. Racist in a general sense, because of course they couldn't explain why their opposition to jews happened, it would shift the focus in a bad way for them. It wasn't about opposing liberalism and communism. It wasn't about allegedly being warmongering. It wasn't even about the fabricated "Holocaust". It was all about Germany upending the jewish stranglehold of Germany through finance, media and politics, and to have the audacity to raise itself from utter misery into a world power, showing the world that the secret ingredient to prosperity is to solve the jewish problem. It may *never* be repeated, so the jews were basically forced to make sure to put as many barriers to that as possible.
So if you want to truly improve your country, you'd have to jump many hurdles - you'd have to be racist, antisemitic, xenophobic, homophobic, trannyphobic. And it's true. If your country is supposed to truly improve, beyond mere alleged 1% improvements that counters the continuous decline a bit, you need to embrace these labels. Accept that you hate homosexuals, because your people's children are the first to get groomed and molested into it. Accept that you hate malicious individuals who hate you, your people and your country to be in position of leadership. Accept that degeneracy is corrosive to your society and culture. Accept that only your own people should be in leadership of your own people. Accept that your own people should be treated better than foreigners who have no allegiance to your country, and would sell you out immediately to throw you under the bus - while you would be ready to kill and die for your country.
And learn to reject the Holocaust. It is a fabricated hoax that makes the jews tremendous amounts of money, and allows them to enjoy immunity even from criticism, as they commit genocides and to all sorts of atrocities. If you name them, "ah it's just an antisemite", as if one could catch the antisemitism like a disease. No, it comes from knowing too much about jews. Israel is the pinnacle of jewry, and look what it is: Created with the effort of the Allies, entirely financed by the US, even having lavish social programs allowing a lot of them to never work a day in their life, committing genocide on a daily basis, being the degeneracy capital #1 in the world, doing their best to warmonger to the fullest extent, with the Samson Option - meaning if they are about to lose, they will nuke not only their enemies, but also you. You, for not having helped them enough as you should have, as subservient cattle to their whims. They are God's chosen, we are slave cattle to them - that is their view. Their soldiers are specialized in shooting civilians, and have made it a sport to target different body parts on different days.
Given this, do you think the same people who gleefully commit genocides and atrocities today, were 1. oh-so innocent scapegoats a century ago (or EVER), and 2. wouldn't make up a hoax that serves them tremendously? Today they own the media across the West - they dictate what is publicized in television and radio. 5 major corporations each owned by jews. Most of them run social media. Through various organizations like AIPAC they run your government - you cannot even vote your way out. Not only the US, ALL Western countries. They run all the NGOs that bring in 3rd world migrants into your country. They import other races, they promote race mixing, they create propaganda (why do you think the majority of characters are black in advertisements?), they push mass surveillance, they destroy you for alleged racism, but let migrants run gang rapes of White girls unscathed. They allow them to carry knives while you may not even defend yourself. If you get stabbed or killed by a migrant, it's probably your own fault anyway - that is their philosophy. They let them create no-go zones where they even use grenades. They let them create not only a massive surge in crime, but also new crime types likes gang rape. And they do all of this as they hand your tax payer money to finance their lavish lifestyles of never working a day in their life. You and your people pay to feed them.
There is no other way to improve our countries than to remove all non-Whites from them. Nothing matters except that. There is no political action that can be done to improve anything without doing that. Or do you think that only because you finally get a fiscally prudent, smart right-winger into office, you'll get economic miracles? Impossible. There is NOTHING they can do. Even if they stop the flood of migration, that only stops the bleeding, but what about those in your country? That is an ever growing problem - low-IQ populations reproduce faster, so it's only a matter of time until you will become a minority in your own country. Do you think they will treat you with the same grace as a reward as you did to them? No. Your children and their children will live in misery and continuous fear. They may find their genetic dead-end. Is that your legacy? And it's not only fear of them, but also fear of your police to go after them. Nobody will side with them, except those pesky racists, fascists, Nazis. They are the ONLY ones who accept the hatred of the public to do what is right. And every good deed they do is punished severely.
What you see in Britain today with muslims stabbing people in the open, with the stabbed White people getting arrested, with muslim rape gangs being protected, is a very similar level of tyranny that existed in the Soviet Union and occupied Eastern Europe. At this point I don't even know which is worse. Both are tyrannies created and maintained by jews.
Hitler was right about jews. This is the greatest lesson we need to learn in day of age. And whoever fought them were brainwashed by jews to proudly serve their interests.
After WWI Germany was in shambles economically and culturally. They were defeated, subjugated and impoverished, with a level of degeneracy that is on a nightmarish level. Child prostitution, transgenderism, rampant homosexuality - and all to survive to the next day because of hyperinflation. Every day all the money you had became practically worthless. The reparations imposed upon Germany had its effects on the Germans. And a part of Germany was handed to Poland as well. Remember, Germany didn't lose WWI that hard as to justify these grave concessions. In fact these peace negotiations were highly questionable as well - whoever lead it from the German side either did a terrible job or intentionally made it as bad as possible.
The jews were a major center piece in all of this. It was jews who were the leading communists, who lead a communist revolution in Germany 1918, which was defeated. They lead the Bolshevik revolution in Russia. It was jews who were the main drivers behind degeneracy, with the Institut für Sexualwissenschaften lead by Magnus Hirschfeld (jew) being notorious. They were in positions where they lived royally while Germans struggled to make it through the day, even doing things like eating in the open and laughing at the Germans' struggles.
The political parties were notorious for being feckless and ineffective. They did nothing to alleviate the problems, and even make them worse (just as today). Then came the NSDAP and Hitler, and they delivered what they promised: Radical changes to end hyperinflation and degeneracy. They removed non-Germans (jews) from positions of finance, power and influence. They replaced the currency with a new one unrelated to the Rothschild's central banking system that today runs across the world. Germany rose from a miserable, hopeless state into a global superpower within mere years. The reason Germans liked Hitler is *because* he did all the right things to lead Germany to that.
However, with that they made 2 inexcusable offenses to the world jewry: 1. They arrested and humiliated a Rothschild, and 2. they overthrew the jewish death grip on Germany and it blossomed into prosperity. In 1933 the jews publicly (in Western media) declared that Germany must be destroyed, that Hitler has to be stopped at all cost, that Hitler will get his war if he wants it or not. These things further radicalized over time. Hitler knew about this, he knew that war would come over Germany, and that Germany must prepare for it. Indeed 1938 Poland occupied Czechoslovakia to provoke Germany (as it was their ally), and 1939 they massacred Germans in occupied Danzig (the land taken away from Germany was still inhabited by mostly Germans). This forced Hitler's hand.
Why would Poland do something like this? They had an alliance with Britain and France. For the very purpose to be used against Germany, so that when Germany was inevitably provoked into war with Poland, all those nations would attack Germany. And Poland was lead by jews, so they were inline with the global interests to bring war upon Germany, no matter what. To them, dead Polish soldiers and an occupied Poland wouldn't be an issue.
Hitler knew all this, this is exactly what the Allies wanted. So he made a pact with the Russians, the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact, to crush Poland from both sides. The western half would go back to Germany, as it was prior to WWI, plus an extra. But it was essential that Germany had to declare war first, that they had to be provoked into doing so. The narrative the jews pushed internationally was that Germany was taken over, that Nazis are evil and that they oppressed jews (for no reason at all of course). And when Hitler finally attacked Poland, with a glee on their face, they announced how they were right all along. No mention of the massacre of Germans in occupied Danzig.
The thing they didn't count with was that Russia would join in. This confused the West severely. Even to them the Russians were an unknown factor. But nevertheless, they followed the plan: They declared war on Germany, but NOT on Russia. Remember, it was an alliance - they should have declared war on Russia, but didn't. They ONLY wanted war with Germany.
So the wars started. France was overran, Britain was kept in check. However it was a pact with Russia - it was clear to Hitler that they were waiting for the "capitalists" to exhaust themselves, so that they could swoop in and take over Europe. When Germany attacked the Soviets, it was when they expected the Russians to attack Germany in 3 weeks. Even if that wasn't the case, they operated on limited knowledge, and with the given intel, they concluded that that would happen. And striking first is better than letting the Russians prepare themselves - indeed the Germans had major successes. And Russia conquering Eastern Europe *proves* Hitler right about Russians - that is what they wanted to do all along.
Enemies from within were put into camps. The communists (political degenerates), the homosexuals, the transvestites, the liberals, the usurers, the enemies of Germany - all those who would weaken Germany *again*, cause misery to it, cause sabotage or provide information to the enemies. As it turned out, most of those were jews. Being jewish was not a criteria to be put into camps, but somehow there was a very strong correlation of being a negative element in society and being jewish. These kind of patterns can be observed widely in many areas, across time, so it's nothing extraordinary. Hitler wanted to put them into camps for one more reason: To reform them by having them do physical labor for each other. Their camps had all sorts of accommodations: Hospitals, nurseries, swimming pools, theaters to name some. It could have worked, but due to war, supply line disruptions and typhus epidemics (for which Zyklon B was used for), things turned sour. The Swiss Red Cross examined the camps, and came to the conclusion that 271000 died in them. Not intentionally, mind you. Way more Germans died in the world war. In fact, there was a sheet that compared religious adherents 1936 and 1948, and while Christians decreased by ~15%, jews remained at ~0%.
After WWII ended, they tried to create the Germans-exterminated-jews narrative, but it failed. Soldiers recognized that some of the photos they've shown were of the Allied bombings of Dresden, which had the purpose to kill as many German civilians as possible to "demoralize the Nazis." Yes, these war crimes were indeed demoralizing, and the Allies were quite ford of them. In fact, there is Eisenhower's Holocaust, who was a jewish general tasked to handle Germany. He pushed through a semantic-legal doctrine that declared German prisoners of war and civilians not as "prisoners of war", who had to get basic accommodations (like not being starved to death) with another term. Through that, he managed to kill millions of Germans after WWII.
Note that the Holocaust didn't exist yet. Nobody who wrote about the war around that time ever mentioned it, nor was it in the lexicon. In fact it took the jews until ~1960 to develop it, to rewrite the camps Germany had into the "Holocaust." They edited photos to do things like 2 German soldiers laughing for a photo into a jew hanging in the background. It turned a mundane, nice moment into some atrocity. They also used various footage of Allied atrocities as evidence. They even made a photo-shoot in 1947 in the camps, all with the right costumes. It aligned well with the groundwork that has been laid out before - the wartime propaganda, and the "denazification" programs (which were political persecutions against Germans, and reeducation programs). Up until that time, jewish lead and created communist nations including the Soviet Union have killed tens of millions of Christians. The Soviet Union's NKVD, which lead the pipeline of arresting people, forcing confessions, putting them into labor camps to eventually die, consisted of 85%+ jews. It was a jewish genocide against White Christians. The Holodomor in Ukraine had a death toll of 5 million, with cynical messages like "don't eat your babies!" as they stripped the population of all food supplies they could. The Ukrainians hated the Russians, which lead them to join the Germans and see them as liberators.
It was of highest importance for the world jewry to depict Germany as the ultimate evil and racist. Racist in a general sense, because of course they couldn't explain why their opposition to jews happened, it would shift the focus in a bad way for them. It wasn't about opposing liberalism and communism. It wasn't about allegedly being warmongering. It wasn't even about the fabricated "Holocaust". It was all about Germany upending the jewish stranglehold of Germany through finance, media and politics, and to have the audacity to raise itself from utter misery into a world power, showing the world that the secret ingredient to prosperity is to solve the jewish problem. It may *never* be repeated, so the jews were basically forced to make sure to put as many barriers to that as possible.
So if you want to truly improve your country, you'd have to jump many hurdles - you'd have to be racist, antisemitic, xenophobic, homophobic, trannyphobic. And it's true. If your country is supposed to truly improve, beyond mere alleged 1% improvements that counters the continuous decline a bit, you need to embrace these labels. Accept that you hate homosexuals, because your people's children are the first to get groomed and molested into it. Accept that you hate malicious individuals who hate you, your people and your country to be in position of leadership. Accept that degeneracy is corrosive to your society and culture. Accept that only your own people should be in leadership of your own people. Accept that your own people should be treated better than foreigners who have no allegiance to your country, and would sell you out immediately to throw you under the bus - while you would be ready to kill and die for your country.
And learn to reject the Holocaust. It is a fabricated hoax that makes the jews tremendous amounts of money, and allows them to enjoy immunity even from criticism, as they commit genocides and to all sorts of atrocities. If you name them, "ah it's just an antisemite", as if one could catch the antisemitism like a disease. No, it comes from knowing too much about jews. Israel is the pinnacle of jewry, and look what it is: Created with the effort of the Allies, entirely financed by the US, even having lavish social programs allowing a lot of them to never work a day in their life, committing genocide on a daily basis, being the degeneracy capital #1 in the world, doing their best to warmonger to the fullest extent, with the Samson Option - meaning if they are about to lose, they will nuke not only their enemies, but also you. You, for not having helped them enough as you should have, as subservient cattle to their whims. They are God's chosen, we are slave cattle to them - that is their view. Their soldiers are specialized in shooting civilians, and have made it a sport to target different body parts on different days.
Given this, do you think the same people who gleefully commit genocides and atrocities today, were 1. oh-so innocent scapegoats a century ago (or EVER), and 2. wouldn't make up a hoax that serves them tremendously? Today they own the media across the West - they dictate what is publicized in television and radio. 5 major corporations each owned by jews. Most of them run social media. Through various organizations like AIPAC they run your government - you cannot even vote your way out. Not only the US, ALL Western countries. They run all the NGOs that bring in 3rd world migrants into your country. They import other races, they promote race mixing, they create propaganda (why do you think the majority of characters are black in advertisements?), they push mass surveillance, they destroy you for alleged racism, but let migrants run gang rapes of White girls unscathed. They allow them to carry knives while you may not even defend yourself. If you get stabbed or killed by a migrant, it's probably your own fault anyway - that is their philosophy. They let them create no-go zones where they even use grenades. They let them create not only a massive surge in crime, but also new crime types likes gang rape. And they do all of this as they hand your tax payer money to finance their lavish lifestyles of never working a day in their life. You and your people pay to feed them.
There is no other way to improve our countries than to remove all non-Whites from them. Nothing matters except that. There is no political action that can be done to improve anything without doing that. Or do you think that only because you finally get a fiscally prudent, smart right-winger into office, you'll get economic miracles? Impossible. There is NOTHING they can do. Even if they stop the flood of migration, that only stops the bleeding, but what about those in your country? That is an ever growing problem - low-IQ populations reproduce faster, so it's only a matter of time until you will become a minority in your own country. Do you think they will treat you with the same grace as a reward as you did to them? No. Your children and their children will live in misery and continuous fear. They may find their genetic dead-end. Is that your legacy? And it's not only fear of them, but also fear of your police to go after them. Nobody will side with them, except those pesky racists, fascists, Nazis. They are the ONLY ones who accept the hatred of the public to do what is right. And every good deed they do is punished severely.
What you see in Britain today with muslims stabbing people in the open, with the stabbed White people getting arrested, with muslim rape gangs being protected, is a very similar level of tyranny that existed in the Soviet Union and occupied Eastern Europe. At this point I don't even know which is worse. Both are tyrannies created and maintained by jews.
Hitler was right about jews. This is the greatest lesson we need to learn in day of age. And whoever fought them were brainwashed by jews to proudly serve their interests.
The last real monarchy left was the hohenzollern dynasty. Even the Romanovs would have probably found themselves replaced eventually, probably still during ww1 (even if there were 0 jews in Russia whatsoever) because of Nicholas' disastrous series of colossal fuckups that fed fire to the russian revolution in the first place. Even without ww1, or russia's non-involvement, Nicholas II would have probably found some other way to get Russia into a foreign policy dispute leading to a war leading to the destruction of the russian empire anyways. He was good at that, and was far more aggressive with foreign policy than Russia had any capability of supporting whatsoever. And he *had* dumbass plans to accomplish later that never happened, such as another go around at attempting to conquer asia. The russian revolution was mostly to blame on the tsar bleeding Russia dry, jews just convinced people to support menshevism/bolshevism and, initially, the stupid fuck kerensky before he proved to be an absolute disaster, instead of the much more authentically russian "going to the people" movement or another ruler entirely.
Capitalism rendered monarchy moribund in most of Europe, though, the only dynasty that really adapted to it were the hohenzollerns, and that's probably because they came to prominence during the rise of capitalism and industrialism. There was no established hohenzollern feudal class. In most instances the nobility actively blocked capitalism from developing (england before cromwell, france, and russia come to mind). Most other monarchies either refused and were replaced, refused and were defanged (England, mainly), or the feudal class was effectively dissolved peacefully and the monarchs themselves retreated to their private lives (almost every european country that still has a monarch falls here, with the exception of the UK and Spain, both of which had bizarre circumstances).
Yes ww1 destroyed monarchism, but there was really only one country left that represented a monarchy that was bound for anything except its own destruction or the liquefaction of actual monarchical power. Meiji japan, the Brazilian empire (oddly enough, though the monarchy got utterly fucked by its bourgeoisie anyways, because reasons), and Germany were some of the only examples of effective and progressive (in the positive sense of that term) monarchies left. In all of these cases, the land holding nobility either barely existed (Brazil, Germany) or the monarch decided to dispose of the nobility themselves and replace them with the bourgeoisie (japan). There are no examples of lasting monarchies with a strong aristocracy, except the Arabian gulf, which is made of countries that are entirely based upon one exported good, oil, so the necessity of an industrial bourgeoisie was not there, regarding their wealth. The reason for this is because manorialism has not been relevant for holding economic power since the 1700s, so the middle class of the medieval ages stole the place of the aristocracies and, since they held more real economic power, demanded society to cave to their whims.
Note that a monarchy itself is just an institution of government where the role of leadership is hereditary. That's it, and there's no system inherently attached to it. North korea is effectively a monarchy, but it's socialist. The german and Japanese empires were monarchies, but purely capitalistic. There is no contradiction here. The reason that monarchy collapsed in Europe though is because the monarchs were always beholden to an aging and functionally useless class of people from the era of Charlemagne because in almost every case, the noble class held more power collectively than did the monarch, especially in france, the birthplace of feudalism. This nobility had a large conflict of interests with the bourgeoisie. Feudalism itself replaced pure autocracy, where emperors in Rome and chieftains in the various tribes held every bit of power. So too did capitalism replace feudalism.
Russia embraced everything besides socialism very late. It did not embrace feudalism until the romanovs, which is when capitalism was fledgling. It did not embrace capitalism until most of Europe already had issues with it. Russia was always behind in some regard. The will of the people in general to embrace bolshevism was largely based on being tired of Russia always being behind, so to them, Russia would finally be ahead. Marx wrote about everything i just said, after all, and historical analysis shows that to be pretty much true, that the lower class will always replace the upper class, and so the workers would inevitably hold the position of the bourgeoisie. Thus, russia would skip ahead in development and become a futuristic society. This is the reason that your average downtrodden russian would join the bolsheviks.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed