White Warrior Poet responds to "media literacy" nigger
(media.scored.co)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
Stuff i was talking about on here 5 years ago i think Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson and their staff must have found a year or two ago and began podcasting about.
Vlad The Impaler with a laptop and internet access may have impacted the world secretly, silently, discretely, but with magntitude and impact immeasureable.
Hey Tucker and Candace. I know you're lurking and reading this. Can you at least give me a shout out on your show for helping you learn the JQ?
Even TheDonald probably has to spend most of their time deleting and censoring stuff about the JQ.
Now, when i am reading normie comment sections on some mainstream news site, or comment sections below a jewTube video, i always see stuff about JQ now. Five years ago you'd never see it. You had to go to stormfront or some back door website on the internet.
White Nationalists aren't loading jews on train cars yet. But we are getting the discussion into the open public dialogue and it's getting put into the conversations people are having. We shook off the taboo spell that prevented people from even being able to discuss these topics before. There was a time maybe just 10 years ago when Obama was still president that if you even suggested the Holocaust was not real you were IMMEDIATELY terminated from your job and everyone called you crazy and if you were on a radio show they'd hang up on you immediately and then apologize to the audience.
I remember driving to work one day. It was probably 2011 or 2012. And the local morning show was talking politics kind of like glen beck style radio show politics but more local level boring stuff. Anyways people were calling in and some guy said "It's the jews" and then wanted to explain but they hung up on him and then said that's absolute crazy talk blah blah denialist blah skinheads how dare you HOW DARE YOU haha and even I was probably dismissive of the guy because i thought obama was a gay muslim and we had to get dem muslim trrrrRRRRRRizts even though Obama's chief guy was rahm emanual whose brother was Trump's agent too
I moved from reading/browsing the_donald to ConsumeProduct years ago. I landed here accidentally(likely from someone's posts) and as the_donald became cult like and semi-censored I really appreciated the people spreading actual truth in the comments. It gave me hope. While J talk is more open I wonder if some sites allow it only to collect data on certain participants. Several years ago there was some guy here on ConsumeProduct (probably an IDF keyboard warrior) stating he was doing exactly that; making a list. Practically everyone who posted or commented here was on his list.
That doesn't mean every book is great, but finding good books on a topic is WAY better than relying on the internet. Especially today.
The general principle of the OP is good.
I don't see that at all.
What Scearpo said was
> "Movies, books, and other longform media are rarely ever valid or relevant as a whole"
Which is an undeniable statement. Note the use of the word RARELY. Words matter, and that one was used with intent.
>"they've always meant to be delivery mechanisms for a few key excerpts and moments that stick with the audience."
Again, a statement I find to be sound. Outside of literary works that were divinely inspired, narratives shape around a central theme or idea.
Don't get autistically hung up on one word or phrase and find yourself missing the forest for the trees. It is exactly the ability to use awareness, acuity, and insight to parse the signal from the noise that makes separates us from the bipedal rabble.
If a book is only useful to convey a key excerpt, it's author lacked these things and you might as well just have a quote of said key excerpt. Yes it might develop excerpt(s) better than just the quote, but this is a description of a book that isn't very good. It denigrates books.