New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
I was thinking about niggers and how they can't entertain hypotheticals ("how would you feel if you didn't eat breakfast?"), and as I walked my dog I thought the question is too mundane to even answer. The stupid answer would be "I'd be hungry", but actually it depends. What if you didn't eat because you weren't hungry? You'd feel nothing unusual. Would I rank the same as a nigger solely because I didn't give the good boy answer?

So I wanted to ask you a hypothetical, that is a bit more sophisticated. Let's say WWII did break out, but the US didn't intervene because they didn't get an excuse to do so via Pearl Harbor. That didn't happen, Germany and Japan would be just friends and not officially allies. France was defeated, Britain agreed to peace, and the Soviet Union was successfully averted using Sarin gas as a threat to not attack Germany. Germany didn't march eastward, so the territory they had was Germany and its former territories prior to WWI (half of Poland) and Austria. The situation stabilized, the strains of WWII were significant. Let's say nukes got invented by the US and Germany, and the Soviets (through jewish spies) managed to build them later on too.

So the hypothetical: **How would the world develop over the next century?** What would we see today? What about feminism, leftism, big corporations ran by jews, media ran by jews, LLMs, corporate culture, the economy? What would be the best-case scenario, the worst-case scenario and/or the average-case scenario?

I would like to hear what you think about this.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
devotech2 on scored.co
6 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Hitler wasn't particularly expansionist. He was more isolationist. But do you know who was very interested in expansionism and exportation of his ideology? Mussolini. An axis victory necessitates an Italian victory as well, and an Italian victory means an invigorated italy that's actually militarily up to par (to be fair to the italians, they were one of the strongest powers in Europe, but depleted themselves before ww2 with continuous and expansive warfare in the 30s. Again more or less proving that italy cared a lot more about this).

An axis victory probably means an italy blowing shit up and causing problems to make other countries adopt fascism. Probably with spain as primary side-kick, given that Franco and mussolini had a good relationship. Mussolini also viewed ww2 fundamentally differently from everyone else. More or less as a means to an end for a worldwide (or at least continent-wide) revolution of fascism, rather than simply hitlers desire to rid the world of the ussr.

Italys theoretical actions would probably mean an immigrant stream into Europe moreso than germanys.

On the part of Japan, they would have probably been thrown out of China eventually anyways. Would china become communist? Probably not. But Japan could barely hold onto china as-is. They couldn't handle it. Mussolini hated the Japanese, Hitler was a sinophile and a japanophile, but he had far more in common with chiang kai shek. Only supporting Japan because it was obvious they'd be the next power. My thought would be more or less that the Japanese empire would eventually collapse anyways, and I think that the sympathies of the other 2 axis countries would end up being with the KMT rather than Japan, eventually.

Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
Toast message