I was thinking about niggers and how they can't entertain hypotheticals ("how would you feel if you didn't eat breakfast?"), and as I walked my dog I thought the question is too mundane to even answer. The stupid answer would be "I'd be hungry", but actually it depends. What if you didn't eat because you weren't hungry? You'd feel nothing unusual. Would I rank the same as a nigger solely because I didn't give the good boy answer?
So I wanted to ask you a hypothetical, that is a bit more sophisticated. Let's say WWII did break out, but the US didn't intervene because they didn't get an excuse to do so via Pearl Harbor. That didn't happen, Germany and Japan would be just friends and not officially allies. France was defeated, Britain agreed to peace, and the Soviet Union was successfully averted using Sarin gas as a threat to not attack Germany. Germany didn't march eastward, so the territory they had was Germany and its former territories prior to WWI (half of Poland) and Austria. The situation stabilized, the strains of WWII were significant. Let's say nukes got invented by the US and Germany, and the Soviets (through jewish spies) managed to build them later on too.
So the hypothetical: **How would the world develop over the next century?** What would we see today? What about feminism, leftism, big corporations ran by jews, media ran by jews, LLMs, corporate culture, the economy? What would be the best-case scenario, the worst-case scenario and/or the average-case scenario?
I would like to hear what you think about this.
There is a ubiquitous downplaying of Hilter's cultural influence. He wasn't *just* industrialising, he was revitilizing the entire civilization; his economic policies were all based on his Germany First cultural policies (loans for families, a car for every German, his massive public architectural works, defending ethnic Germans in foreign territory etc). It's debatable if he even knew that these policies would lead to such an economic boom because that was largely a side effect of simply doing things in support of the German people.
So "getting rid of the Jews saved Germany" is accurate, but only because the exact opposite of Jewish policies (focus on economic gains, controlled by the wealthy foreigners, and attack the wellbeing of the people) is what's best for a country.
Yes, but that was kind of Hitler's point. The very fact that removing the jews lead to such a massive uplifting of Germany proved him right. I am sure Hitler spoke and wrote about this a lot.
You could say: "Hitler was right about jews." Remember the meme "Islam is right about women"? Well, I don't think it would drive leftists into frenzy like that, but it's succinct.
I am not sure if it was the removal of the jews or Hitler's actions that lead to the rapid recovery of Germany, but for sure the former was a prerequisite, and that the combination was great.
As of Hungary, they did the soft approach of NatSoc, supporting families, having more children, anti-feminism, anti-faggotry, pro-Christianity. It worked fine, but didn't do as much as removing jews and all their influence on a substantial level would have done. We are trapped in a socialist state basically, thanks to the communists. As of right now, the jews have regained power, and have already done constitutional alterations to prevent Orban from being elected again. But nothing that was unforgivable/irreversible though... yet.