You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
TheMafia on scored.co
25 days ago0 points(+0/-0)1 child
> 2.5 hours X 900,000 = 2,250,000 hours = 257 years worth of cremations
The obvious problem with this overly simplistic math is, there would be more than one oven, you can load more than one person in it, and women and children cremate faster than men.
If you had 70 ovens and burned three at once you could pull this off. The numbers aren't that hard to believe.
The real problem is the entirely jewish description of the details of the operation:
They claim that when planes flew overhead they would put the giant body pit fires out, and then cover them with foliage to hide them. They don't explain how the bones were crushed or how the ash was transported by truck "into the woods" or how it was unloaded and spread from there.
The labor of burning the bodies is easy. The labor of actually successfully covering it all up is impossible.
> Roughly the size and weight of 40 Blue Whales
No, just the weight, the density of ash is effectively zero. Wales are big because fat is dense.
70 ovens? 70 ovens!? Are you hearing yourself?! If there were SEVENTY OVENS it would have been in the text books! Your argument is based on something that is obviously not true.
I got to thinking about this, the Google says a cremation oven in the 1940s was around 30 square feet so that would be 2100 square feet just for ovens. If any location had that much space dedicated to ovens it would be the deadest of kicked horses. That would be two 3 bedroom houses for just this. And that's assuming you could put them all next to each other which you couldn't because then maintenance would be impossible so they would take up even more space.
We do not hear "and here is the massive building the Nazis used to burn jews."
Yes, and if you use critical reading skills and the _smallest_ amount of intelligence you can muster, you'll see I didn't actually make that argument.
> Your argument
You are actually fighting with a strawman. lol.
> that is obviously not true.
Yes, but when I argue against it, it makes sense, when you argue against it, you sound like a retarded child. If you're going to do the math, you know, actually _do it_.
Otherwise people observe your completely flawed argument and dismiss it. Which is how I'm now going to handle you.
I looked up cremation square footage and did the math then presented the answer. Are you a bot?
If you weren't making the argument then why bring it up since it makes no sense other than to throw confusion and to break down a factual statement with ridiculous statements. So you're just a dissenter, anti American dissenter.
"If you had SEVENTY OVENS and burned three at once you could pull this off" did you say this? Yes you did, ask anyone if this statement is a argument for the seventy ovens being present and they will figure it out without critical thinking skills because the answer is obvious. Yes this is arguing for it.
Holy shit did you just say you didn't say it you typed it? I'm arguing with a literal child. Don't stay up to late jr.
The obvious problem with this overly simplistic math is, there would be more than one oven, you can load more than one person in it, and women and children cremate faster than men.
If you had 70 ovens and burned three at once you could pull this off. The numbers aren't that hard to believe.
The real problem is the entirely jewish description of the details of the operation:
https://www.zchor.org/treblink/wiernik.htm#chapter9
They claim that when planes flew overhead they would put the giant body pit fires out, and then cover them with foliage to hide them. They don't explain how the bones were crushed or how the ash was transported by truck "into the woods" or how it was unloaded and spread from there.
The labor of burning the bodies is easy. The labor of actually successfully covering it all up is impossible.
> Roughly the size and weight of 40 Blue Whales
No, just the weight, the density of ash is effectively zero. Wales are big because fat is dense.
I got to thinking about this, the Google says a cremation oven in the 1940s was around 30 square feet so that would be 2100 square feet just for ovens. If any location had that much space dedicated to ovens it would be the deadest of kicked horses. That would be two 3 bedroom houses for just this. And that's assuming you could put them all next to each other which you couldn't because then maintenance would be impossible so they would take up even more space.
We do not hear "and here is the massive building the Nazis used to burn jews."
No, I typed that, I didn't say it outloud.
> If there were SEVENTY OVENS
Yes, and if you use critical reading skills and the _smallest_ amount of intelligence you can muster, you'll see I didn't actually make that argument.
> Your argument
You are actually fighting with a strawman. lol.
> that is obviously not true.
Yes, but when I argue against it, it makes sense, when you argue against it, you sound like a retarded child. If you're going to do the math, you know, actually _do it_.
Otherwise people observe your completely flawed argument and dismiss it. Which is how I'm now going to handle you.
If you weren't making the argument then why bring it up since it makes no sense other than to throw confusion and to break down a factual statement with ridiculous statements. So you're just a dissenter, anti American dissenter.
"If you had SEVENTY OVENS and burned three at once you could pull this off" did you say this? Yes you did, ask anyone if this statement is a argument for the seventy ovens being present and they will figure it out without critical thinking skills because the answer is obvious. Yes this is arguing for it.
Holy shit did you just say you didn't say it you typed it? I'm arguing with a literal child. Don't stay up to late jr.