The Second Vatican Council movement has had "popes" that seem to directly attack previous Catholic teaching; I expect this will resolve to the council being rejected as a false council like the "robber council" of Second Council of Ephesus, as well as the papal claimants being declared invalid or "not popes" since that time.
"Sportsball" Analogy
The analogy would be like if, since the world cup of soccer is going on soon, FIFA - the governing body for soccer - had a meeting and decided something absurd like every goal was worth 3 points instead of 1 point. Some people might accept that this is "true soccer" and some "legitimate change to the game". Others would denounce the organization and set up their own leagues to preserve "traditional soccer", and declare the FIFA leadership has no "true authority", and that the meeting deciding on 3 goals has no "binding authority" on "true soccer fans". Something like that has happened to create "traditional Catholicism" in contrast to this mainstream "Vatican 2 'Catholicism'".
Are Catholics "Autonomous"?
Section 20 of the new "encyclical" by "Leo XIV" reads:
> The Second Vatican Council expressed this principle with particular precision in the Pastoral Constitution Gaudium et Spes, whose sixtieth anniversary we remembered and celebrated with gratitude on 7 December 2025: “If by the autonomy of earthly affairs is meant that created things and societies themselves enjoy their own laws and values… then the demand for autonomy is perfectly in order.”
I don't believe this is the former Catholic teaching on "autonomy"; man is not "autonomous" but subject to God's laws. Autonomy would be a "license to sin": you could set your own "law" that it is ok to do this or that thing contrary to Catholic teaching. This is therefore the wrong understanding of "autonomy", and they are ambiguous about what they mean by "true autonomy" (which would be a "freedom within limits"; much like in Genesis, Adam and Eve had total liberty to eat from whatever tree, except for that of the tree which yielded "forbidden fruit").
I believe the document contains more errors like this, continuing this heretical movement of modernism.
They attacked in different ways, using the Scofield Reference Bible and subverting mainstream and social media, academia and public school boards to censor arguments against their toxic hasbara.
And yes, the Masons are another jewish grift to bribe and extort powerful goys who couldn't be leveraged in traditional methods using bribery or children.
There doesn't seem to be a square inch of Western society that jews haven't smeared with their subversive shit.
It's like their hands are soaked in black oil and their fingerprints can be seen everywhere.