Consume Product

>Damn near every assignment is a group project and you always have at least one total retard in your group


That hits home. Don't like people. Don't like group projects. Don't like picking up other people's slack.

Trades are where it's at. Huge shortage of competent people in trades.

College degrees suck because it's jobs that have HR departments. None of the White Nationalists here would ever comply with HR policies. These jobs are women prancing around in high heels and shitskin fake minorities and faggots and cucks.

In trades though you have to be careful who you deal with. Stay out of bad contracts and bad customers and get the customers to write the checks. I give discounts for fiat cash or gold/silver

I heard jewkraine killed some Russian students this week and Russians are pissed and Russia may attack kiev soon

ZOG is provoking conflicts all over the damn place. Maybe we get ZOG to fight too many fronts while it goes broke like Rome did.

America is a humiliation ritual

It's a filtering system. That's why the "greek life" exists on campuses. It's why secret societies, the CIA, and MKULTRA type programs recruit there.

It's literally an offer of yourself up to the state.

If it's just a question of being educated, for your own purposes, then just go get the books and do the work yourself. There's literally nothing stopping you.

Exactly, fuck the Jews

"In Chapter IX, "The Vice of Education," Dr. Henry C. Link challenges the widespread American worship of formal education, arguing that an over-reliance on prolonged schooling often acts as a "vice" that deteriorates character and personality.

Education Does Not Improve Personality
Despite the massive growth in high school and college enrollment, psychological studies reveal that formal education above grade school does little to nothing to improve an individual's personality. In fact, testing shows that people with almost no formal education possess personality traits equal to those of college graduates, and the poorest students often have just as good personalities as the most brilliant scholars. Instead of developing character, prolonged education frequently results in the deterioration of personality by shielding students from the realities of a working life. Recognizing this, many employers now prioritize a student's extracurricular achievements and social skills over their academic records.

The Paralysis of "Absorption" vs. "Production"
The core psychological flaw in modern education is that it is essentially a period of absorption. To develop an effective, extroverted personality, a person must learn to be a "producer" whose energies are actively converted into skills that are useful and pleasing to others. However, formal education requires students to spend years passively reading, listening, and studying—habits that foster extreme introversion. The longer this "nursing period" lasts, the more students become "sponges" who know how to consume information but dread practical production.

The "Inbreeding" of the Teaching Profession
Another major flaw is that the educational system is self-perpetuating, selecting teachers based purely on formal academic attainment (like holding M.A. or Ph.D. degrees) rather than their ability to build well-rounded character. This creates an "inbreeding" effect where teachers naturally reward students who act like quiet, unobtrusive "sponges". Psychological studies actually show that teachers rate younger children as having much better personalities than older, more independent children, proving that the classroom ideal is passive docility rather than a positive, creative individuality.

The Danger of the "Liberal Mind"
Perhaps the most damaging aspect of higher education is its glorification of the "liberal mind". A liberal education systematically emancipates students from the religious, moral, and traditional restraints of their childhood, but it utterly fails to substitute any compelling new ideals to guide them. "

I attended 3 different subjects in 2 universities in the past. It was in Germany, so it wasn't as degenerate as in OP's case.

First one was laws. It was tedious and boring. The students were boring and were basically competing for who was the most system-compliant drone.

Second one was architecture. Turns out, it was basically an adult daycare where we were supposed to build some pointless gadget for whatever artistic purpose. It was completely infantile and humiliating. My contribution was a joke - I literally didn't take the main class seriously.

Third one was informatics. Now you'd think this one is it, but actually there were various classes that were quite difficult. *And completely USELESS*. These were essentially theory which had no practical application whatsoever, and math (Calculus) which you'd never use in practice. At that point I was already able to code, so I recognized that it was all a barrier-of-entry type of thing, where the main goal was to get the certificate at the end.

I quit all 3. Then at some point I started to work as a programmer. My wage increased by 100% in the span of ~6 years, which I assume is rare. I worked on quite sophisticated projects, but the company boss was a micro-managing retard, and *most* people were used to have their projects scrapped. I finished 1 large project (with multiple people in the team, me working on the core part who knew everything (they still went to the UI fucktards for questions, because the testers were idiots)), one moderate (there was no reason not to just integrate it), and both got canned. The working atmosphere was that you were there to get paid and do what you're told. I did more - and it was pointless and not appreciated the slightest. I also had some personal side-projects going just in case the leadership would decide to do the smart thing (which they didn't of course).

Anyway, I got my advantage out of it, and whatever I missed from university I picked up in drive-by as I worked there. I got the proof that I was right, that it was a waste of time.

> Lands you a glorified adult daycare job, albeit with good pay (I will concede here)

That's literally all there is to it. It's like a proxy for an IQ test. However higher education produces a lot of idiots nowadays, so you can't rely on that any more (for ~2 decades at least).

It's worse for women. Any decent woman that joins an university is bound to be corrupted by the demonic people that live there

TBF, most of these issues with university are front-loaded on you in your first 2 years or so. Once you get into higher level courses for you major, the class sizes get smaller and you're around more people that are genuinely interested in the subject - that was my experience at least.

Do I think it was worth it in the end? Absolutely not; I don't work even tangentially within my degree field and don't think I'd ever find anything if I did. You also have to be strong-willed to resist all the (((propaganda))) and if you are that strong-willed your time is best spent elsewhere.

I'd love to see a based takeback of the universities/intelligentsia at large, but sadly there isn't enough interest to every try.

> Only downside is that the jobs you get don't pay as well as certain university degrees

you may start out a little on the low end but work your way up then start your own side gig to make a name for yourself, then transition to your own contracting business when you have enough experience and connections. If you are smart and dedicated enough you can easily do it.

self owned trade businesses are the next millionaire class, not some college degreed "whatever". I am a STEM college degreed "whatever" and all I can say is that degree is a requirement for a job, but that doesnt determine how well someone will do in that position.