You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
1
devotech2 on scored.co
28 days ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
>The problem is not that pointing out bad things in a country means it's unsalvageable.
I fully agree. I point out bad things all the time. But theres a certain... maliciousness that I feel from these posts. I'm going more or less off of vibes here. But his entire account seems fairly odd. If you look at his history, he's active on every popular scored.co board and posts the exact same things on each one. He rarely ever engages with the comments on these posts either, nor anything else. I hate being a reddit-tier "snoop", but I am a moderator (even though I rarely enforce anything, this site is pretty quiet) and i had decided after his last post that his behavior was kind of odd.
There's a difference, for example, between this guy who only posts dooming news article every few days across scored and then never says anything, and then tallestskil (a known pessimist, whether or not that's true, that's the perception that many have of him) who actually, well, gives some framing behind his beliefs and what he thinks, and argues his point, and makes that point known in the first place. There is nothing to go off of here. Its hard to tell if OP is even an actual Finn. What if he's a swede that hates finland for some reason? I understand wanted to keep some degree of anonymity, but like, come on. There's not even a message to what he's saying. He advocates nothing.
>Also it's a matter of practicality. You need to inform people about the negatives in order for calls for action to be effective (if at all).
I agree that informing people about the negatives is very much a fundamental necessity. I do it all the time. But if I were to say, continuously reiterate through my posts that everything is bad, and then give zero information whatsoever apart from newspaper screenshots, that doesn't work very well in my favor.
>And telling people what to do is generally disliked, while giving them information to make up their own mind is more appreciated.
I do disagree with decentralized thinking though. I agree that it's important to float information to people, but there has to he more... propagandization than this. This community is small enough that I could make a point and then engage with people on a case by case basis explaining my viewpoint. Successful propagandization through driving home points and then politicizing people to agree with you has enormous benefits, as shown by history.
>And positive things are generally either boring, already known, or normal for us. It's why the media is also so overwhelmingly negative. "I went on the train, and it had no niggers and I didn't get stabbed" isn't a big event.
The media does engage in positive propaganda, they do it extensively, it's just a lot more subtle about it (unless it's not). Ads that have a white paired with a nigger are instances of positive propaganda, for example. Movies that have a brilliant negro as their protagonists are engaging in positive propaganda. The *news* proper doesn't really engage in positive propaganda, but the whole body of western soft power is indeed positive propaganda. *We can use soft power and subliminal messaging too*. Actually, it's probably a bigger deal than the negative propaganda of the news media.
>OP wants Finland to be in its prime, not its decline. And too many Fins are not aware that it is heading towards decline.
I am not too sure that he actually does. Especially considering that his username is a Hindi word that means "something that has come to an end". And if I actually cared, I would engage more and advocate more. This is the difference between dooming and having a realistic viewpoint on things. I would also say that it would help to aggregate in Finnish communities, and these posts are, honestly, not going to be cared about much by most people on scored. But I don't know if he does/doesn't do that or not. So it isn't my place.
And if op is legitimate, take these criticisms wisely and start thinking about them. If you're a real person, I wish you the best, but realize that the way you engage with (or, rather, dont engage with) everyone makes most people ignore your posts and causes them to sit with only a few upvotes and usually little acknowledgement or debate. People like activity, people like it when you show that you care, people like to know that you have beliefs and what those beliefs are. That's the only way to build any sort of community or create any sort of action that can change Finland (or wherever you're from) or anywhere else.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
> I'm going more or less off of vibes here. But his entire account seems fairly odd.
That pajeet nickname thing is in itself weird enough. What I said goes in general, but this one... is different.
Looking into it, it's an account that posts a lot of the same stuff, and then doubles down on how bad Finland is. People seem to disagree. He even said that ~60% of adults are overweight, ~28% are obese... that is just weird. It seems just outright wrong.
His posts are also only about how Finns are bad, but he writes nothing about brownoids/3rd world immigration being a problem anywhere. It's just whatever he can find that is negative about Finland he posts on 2-3 boards at once.
> There's not even a message to what he's saying. He advocates nothing.
I think you are right about this one. It could be as simple as "Finns are stupid and bad, let us brownoids fix it."
> Successful propagandization through driving home points and then politicizing people to agree with you has enormous benefits, as shown by history.
That's fine. But we are not the target audience for that. If anything, we'd have the role to create propaganda for masses to consume. Basically truth propaganda that counters the propaganda of the jews.
> We can use soft power and subliminal messaging too.
Yeah, but where? And how?
> not going to be cared about much by most people on scored. But I don't know if he does/doesn't do that or not. So it isn't my place.
I think it's some pajeet/jew who is paid to do this. Minimal effort multiplied across multiple boards and accounts. Doesn't argue with people, doesn't quote anyone, doesn't elaborate, doesn't make points. And that account is dedicated for Finland. There might be someone handing out images and titles, and he is running the posting.
Remember, they are not smart. They are vicious, persistent, nasty, deceptive, violent even, but they are not smart at all - they do not have any capability to see further than we do, to predict the future better. If they do, they are behind the scenes manipulating it actively, or getting informed by their friends.
I fully agree. I point out bad things all the time. But theres a certain... maliciousness that I feel from these posts. I'm going more or less off of vibes here. But his entire account seems fairly odd. If you look at his history, he's active on every popular scored.co board and posts the exact same things on each one. He rarely ever engages with the comments on these posts either, nor anything else. I hate being a reddit-tier "snoop", but I am a moderator (even though I rarely enforce anything, this site is pretty quiet) and i had decided after his last post that his behavior was kind of odd.
There's a difference, for example, between this guy who only posts dooming news article every few days across scored and then never says anything, and then tallestskil (a known pessimist, whether or not that's true, that's the perception that many have of him) who actually, well, gives some framing behind his beliefs and what he thinks, and argues his point, and makes that point known in the first place. There is nothing to go off of here. Its hard to tell if OP is even an actual Finn. What if he's a swede that hates finland for some reason? I understand wanted to keep some degree of anonymity, but like, come on. There's not even a message to what he's saying. He advocates nothing.
>Also it's a matter of practicality. You need to inform people about the negatives in order for calls for action to be effective (if at all).
I agree that informing people about the negatives is very much a fundamental necessity. I do it all the time. But if I were to say, continuously reiterate through my posts that everything is bad, and then give zero information whatsoever apart from newspaper screenshots, that doesn't work very well in my favor.
>And telling people what to do is generally disliked, while giving them information to make up their own mind is more appreciated.
I do disagree with decentralized thinking though. I agree that it's important to float information to people, but there has to he more... propagandization than this. This community is small enough that I could make a point and then engage with people on a case by case basis explaining my viewpoint. Successful propagandization through driving home points and then politicizing people to agree with you has enormous benefits, as shown by history.
>And positive things are generally either boring, already known, or normal for us. It's why the media is also so overwhelmingly negative. "I went on the train, and it had no niggers and I didn't get stabbed" isn't a big event.
The media does engage in positive propaganda, they do it extensively, it's just a lot more subtle about it (unless it's not). Ads that have a white paired with a nigger are instances of positive propaganda, for example. Movies that have a brilliant negro as their protagonists are engaging in positive propaganda. The *news* proper doesn't really engage in positive propaganda, but the whole body of western soft power is indeed positive propaganda. *We can use soft power and subliminal messaging too*. Actually, it's probably a bigger deal than the negative propaganda of the news media.
>OP wants Finland to be in its prime, not its decline. And too many Fins are not aware that it is heading towards decline.
I am not too sure that he actually does. Especially considering that his username is a Hindi word that means "something that has come to an end". And if I actually cared, I would engage more and advocate more. This is the difference between dooming and having a realistic viewpoint on things. I would also say that it would help to aggregate in Finnish communities, and these posts are, honestly, not going to be cared about much by most people on scored. But I don't know if he does/doesn't do that or not. So it isn't my place.
And if op is legitimate, take these criticisms wisely and start thinking about them. If you're a real person, I wish you the best, but realize that the way you engage with (or, rather, dont engage with) everyone makes most people ignore your posts and causes them to sit with only a few upvotes and usually little acknowledgement or debate. People like activity, people like it when you show that you care, people like to know that you have beliefs and what those beliefs are. That's the only way to build any sort of community or create any sort of action that can change Finland (or wherever you're from) or anywhere else.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
That pajeet nickname thing is in itself weird enough. What I said goes in general, but this one... is different.
Looking into it, it's an account that posts a lot of the same stuff, and then doubles down on how bad Finland is. People seem to disagree. He even said that ~60% of adults are overweight, ~28% are obese... that is just weird. It seems just outright wrong.
His posts are also only about how Finns are bad, but he writes nothing about brownoids/3rd world immigration being a problem anywhere. It's just whatever he can find that is negative about Finland he posts on 2-3 boards at once.
> There's not even a message to what he's saying. He advocates nothing.
I think you are right about this one. It could be as simple as "Finns are stupid and bad, let us brownoids fix it."
> Successful propagandization through driving home points and then politicizing people to agree with you has enormous benefits, as shown by history.
That's fine. But we are not the target audience for that. If anything, we'd have the role to create propaganda for masses to consume. Basically truth propaganda that counters the propaganda of the jews.
> We can use soft power and subliminal messaging too.
Yeah, but where? And how?
> not going to be cared about much by most people on scored. But I don't know if he does/doesn't do that or not. So it isn't my place.
I think it's some pajeet/jew who is paid to do this. Minimal effort multiplied across multiple boards and accounts. Doesn't argue with people, doesn't quote anyone, doesn't elaborate, doesn't make points. And that account is dedicated for Finland. There might be someone handing out images and titles, and he is running the posting.
Remember, they are not smart. They are vicious, persistent, nasty, deceptive, violent even, but they are not smart at all - they do not have any capability to see further than we do, to predict the future better. If they do, they are behind the scenes manipulating it actively, or getting informed by their friends.