You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
9
they-see-me-trollin on scored.co
4 days ago9 points(+0/-0/+9Score on mirror)1 child
the pfizer EUA itself admits they didn't even track stats for prevention of transmission. the problem is really that the control group didn't get enough infections, and the test group got too many. they expected the test group to get far fewer infections, and then it wouldn't have even been an issue.
when it came to filing the test group had over 300 people disqualified for unexplained protocol deviations, more than 5x the control group. if even a quarter of them were infected, the EUA would not have been granted. in other words, the data was cooked after the fact. the regulators refused to delve into why.
the whole thing was an exercise in humiliation rituals and useful idiot manipulation. it should have been obvious when they said BLM riots were okay, but church from your own car in the parking lot was not. when politicians and celebrities showing up for events were allowed to go unmasked, but hired help and non-celebrity performers had to stay masked... an obvious humiliation ritual in plain sight.
The regulatory agency allowed Pfizer/Moderna/et al to use VAERS as an adverse reporting system for their safety tests because their untested "vaccine" *was already deployed on the population*.
So what did VAERS see?
In one year, this shot had more adverse reactions than *every* other vaccine over the last *20* years, combined. And it wasn't close, it was an order of magnitude.
when it came to filing the test group had over 300 people disqualified for unexplained protocol deviations, more than 5x the control group. if even a quarter of them were infected, the EUA would not have been granted. in other words, the data was cooked after the fact. the regulators refused to delve into why.
the whole thing was an exercise in humiliation rituals and useful idiot manipulation. it should have been obvious when they said BLM riots were okay, but church from your own car in the parking lot was not. when politicians and celebrities showing up for events were allowed to go unmasked, but hired help and non-celebrity performers had to stay masked... an obvious humiliation ritual in plain sight.
The regulatory agency allowed Pfizer/Moderna/et al to use VAERS as an adverse reporting system for their safety tests because their untested "vaccine" *was already deployed on the population*.
So what did VAERS see?
In one year, this shot had more adverse reactions than *every* other vaccine over the last *20* years, combined. And it wasn't close, it was an order of magnitude.
And they never pulled it.