Charges lowered so far....depends on plea
(media.scored.co)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
Second of all shooting an animal on a rampage is good justice.
There was this old story about a lady who kept a pet chimp, she gave it wine and Xanax, I shit you not, she named it Travis.
Travis ripped her friends face and I think a hand off, the woman got a face transplant, she looks like a zombie,
I see that as a parallel to white liberal women voting for leftiist shit like Mamdani or Newsome. Only they do not get their face ripped off., so they keep voting for it, even though their face is getting peeled off slowly, You were better off with Travis the chimp. IMHO
The general consensus seems to be that they are about 1.5-2x as strong.
This BBC article talks about how their muscle fibers are not like ours. https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-40405026
>A study suggests the difference is mostly due to a higher proportion in chimps of a muscle fibre type involved in powerful, rapid movements. Chimps possess about twice the amount of "fast-twitch" muscle fibre. This type of fibre contracts quickly and is useful for rapid movements such as sprinting. But fast-twitch fibres have a downside: they quickly tire. By contrast, corresponding human muscles are dominated by "slow-twitch" muscle fibres, which contract more slowly, but keep going for longer. They are useful for activities that require endurance.
This article interested me because i've seen guys and even worked with guys who looked like they had big muscles but they really didn't have any strength. When we had to lift stuff they seemed to struggle whereas some guys didn't have big popcorn muscles but had some sort of brute force strength and could lift heavy items. So looks can be deceiving and maybe it is because of how these muscle fibers are. Some people might have big biceps but how good are the fibers in that muscle? If they were eating that whey and creatine and milkshake shit which i think just inflates their muscles with air and doesn't build good quality muscle fiber. Whereas if you were eating eggs and steak then that is better higher quality nutrition. Just my hypothesis based on experience, not founded in any scientific study.
I agree with everything you're saying but that's pound for pound strength. If you go to the gym and/or work physical labor you can be stronger than a chimp fairly easily. Chimps are quite lithe compared to humans. The big deal is the fact that chimps have a lot of pulling strength vs humans, very primitive fine motor control over what they're doing, and the fact that humans don't fight like chimps and we have no idea what the fuck to do when we're fighting something *vaguely* similar, sort of an "uncanny valley effect" but not. We do well against animals nothing like a human, like dogs, and each other, but primate fights rarely go well. But if a human trained in "chimp martial arts" and had developed muscles, he'd probably he an alpha of a tribe.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
Edit: if I’m remembering correctly chimps also have way more fast twitch muscle than we have.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
Many bodybuilders in my gym have joint issues, and their connective tissues are a strong gust of wind away from a tear. They look great, but you're correct, it's not a natural state and it comes at a cost.
https://youtu.be/2mEYSyMEZ58
Great channel for natural lifters/trainers IMHO.