New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
41
posted 16 hours ago by vanhagar on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +41Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Amerikanerr on scored.co
3 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
It was never about the skin color. It is always about the bone structure, individual facial features, the phenotype, and the breakdown of the ancestry that comes with being White. You cannot call yourself White if you aren't mainly the descendants of the European hunter gatherers, European farmers, and have a minor Caucuses component (which is from steppe DNA). This is the thing people don't understand. There are swarthy Europeans out there who I still would consider White no matter what for this exact reason.
devotech2 on scored.co
2 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
>minor Caucuses component

Small correction: it's not that minor. Not a majority of the dna of course (which is EEF, as an average) but steppe dna is a very large part of the European gene pool. Usually reaching about 20% as a minimum in southern Europe and 40+% in northern europe. The smallest large population present in the gene pool would be the hunter gatherers.

Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
Amerikanerr on scored.co
1 hour ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Yes, however the caucusus component is only about ~50% of the steppe while the remaining is EHG which dilutes the CHG component.
devotech2 on scored.co
1 hour ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
You're correct. I thought you were referring to the steppe component as a whole as the caucasus component (some theories place the PIEs around the caucasus rather than the steppe. It's somewhat plausible.)

Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
Toast message