New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
40
posted 13 hours ago by vanhagar on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +40Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
18
Butttoucha9k on scored.co
13 hours ago 18 points (+0 / -0 / +18Score on mirror ) 1 child
The biggest issue we have is the denial of separate species of human. Human should be a genus.

We should have social pressures against miscegenation and for in group promotion. We shouldnt have laws against it, because organic hybridization which happens against borderlands outcast groups etc is a good thing, in small natural amounts, but most of those are failures as is natural. Some become new better versions and replace previous populations in certain areas, like the scythians become celts and Scandinavians, Frisians mixing with Britons becoming the English, etc. But these are long, slow, organic processes which had strong social pressures to discourage them en masses.

We have to get people to understand why *successful control group populations* are scientifically necessary. Its a thing even atheists or leftists can understand. You cant run an experiment without a control group.

Irish have hyper efficient livers. Filipinos have hyper efficient spleens. Swedes are immune to the bubonic plague. Koreans have no body odor. These are neat and important things, but if we make them all fuck each other to a Grey mass we lose them all. Sure we might make a superman, but that's a one in a million shot. What's most likely is we lose the ability to recreate that ability forever. Control group preservation is vital to all future endeavors.

This is the argument I use to blue haired people and it always works.
TallestSkil on scored.co
13 hours ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror ) 1 child
>We have to get people to understand why

They never will. That’s why you need laws.
Butttoucha9k on scored.co
11 hours ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror ) 1 child
They ALWAYS have. Mixing is incredibly recent. We didnt need laws to prevent it. We needed social pressure. Laws are a point of contention for people to rebel against and rally behind. Nobody likes being *told* what to do.

Social pressure puts the decision inside of them. Its *their* choice. The laws are part of how they manipulated people into embracing it.

TallestSkil on scored.co
11 hours ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 2 children
We see what people have chosen to do without social protection against it. *That’s* why laws exist.
desperateincelUwU on scored.co
7 hours ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Laws prevent us from attacking those who do wrong.
TallestSkil on scored.co
5 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
No, they don’t. The law explicitly says what to do to wrongdoers. We choose not to do it.
Butttoucha9k on scored.co
4 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
The lack of *social* pressure is the problem as i already stated and you just repeated. Laws arent necessary. Social cohesiveness is.
Toast message