New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
53
honey I fucked up (media.scored.co)
posted 23 hours ago by rattleS on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +53Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Butttoucha9k on scored.co
20 hours ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Sure but who gets to decide who votes? Theres the power if you dont have a specific baseline ruleset that cant be manipulated, like "landowner of at least 1 acre and both biological parents were born in the u.s.a. and has lived in the u.s.a. for the last 10 years" or some shit.

If you tie it to testing for intelligence who grades the tests etc.
devotech2 on scored.co
20 hours ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
>Sure but who gets to decide who votes?

Easy, nobody at all. Period.

Every form of voting that exists is subject to jewish demagoguery. Actually, jews are not necessarily even a requirement, just demagoguery period, though jews are definitely the worst. No matter how many restrictions are placed on it, it's always like that. That's how that ended up changing to begin with. Candidates who wanted to ammend the constitution to gain more votes, so they appealed to *something* or other that the aforementioned landowning white males agreed with to get them to want to hand over voting rights to the next caste of people down, and so on over so many years. And, plus, there are even certain topics of governance that the average land holding white male of x years of age would be ignorant of without being a government official.

The solution is that people should not be able to vote for anyone above local-level officials, such as sheriffs and mayors. There's no reason that someone should make a vote for a representative based off of geopolitical and socioeconomic affairs that the average person does not and will not ever understand. Deciding the "line of succession" should come from a grand council of officials within the state.

The governing body of the US was already completely and utterly ruined by its dumbass voters less than 100 years after the founding of the damned country, and that's without the female vote at all. And the devolution into demagoguery started the moment Washington left office. No, voting does not work.

The people *can* make their voice known, however, in areas in which they're knowledgeable, concerning their employment/education/role in society, and get legislation passed via popular vote through syndicates/corporate bodies within the framework of the state. This is real "democracy", and was kind of the entire deal behind fascism/national socialism.

Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed

Butttoucha9k on scored.co
19 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
I dont disagree that "democracy" isnt the best solution. I was speaking from within the current framework. All frameworks have flaws. Democracies' is stupid people.
Toast message