1 day ago17 points(+0/-0/+17Score on mirror)1 child
Yeah Britain followed the pride flag instead of its Union Jack, the resulting divide and conquer campaign has led to the fall of Britain.
Its a good message, but the flag is a rainbow. Pride came before our Fall. Poorest we've ever been, most unsafe we've enter been. All thanks to our intellengstia blindly following the Pride flag and not the British Union that built a now fallen nation. #FallenBritain
1 day ago17 points(+0/-0/+17Score on mirror)2 children
"Translation: He's not leading anyone."
"He" who, exactly? The message is so ambiguous, it could mean anyone you want, which is exactly what "Banksy" or whatever committee that created it wants. The subtext, the intended meaning, is that this is the folly of White Britons who want any shred of a national identity. If you want the government to represent you and your interests, you're stupid and ignorant.
But, at the exact same time, it could represent the folly of the current government who has been blinded by Liberal Pluralism, which is why it's the Union Jack rather than St George's Cross.
Typically Lefty nonsense; a completely ambiguous wall of text that can be interpreted to make them "right" no matter what.
Banksy serves the government and institutions of the globalist world hegemony, not the people. He exists to provide a false definition of rebellion. His artwork is neither dangerous nor new. His messages are the same overdone liberal platitudes that we have suffered since the 2000s. By propping up a mainstream and safe artist as the anonymous face of rebellion, the fringes of the counter-culture are less likely to threaten those who are actually in control.
If Banksy were the person he thinks he is, if he were truly dedicated to speaking truth to power, he would take risks and criticize those who are in actual power. He never will, because he is a larper.
The time of fence-sitting pussy-footing is over.