You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
9
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 month ago9 points(+0/-0/+9Score on mirror)2 children
# If any of these links are dead, let me know. This is one of my oldest pastas, from before I even cared about race.
Land “readings” are [diverging](http://i.imgur.com/8RwdDFT.png) from satellite data (which [NASA itself says is more accurate](http://i.imgur.com/OISZ078.png) and should be the standard instead) because over 40% of land “readings” are estimates made for places ***without recording equipment.*** To illustratively do something that the psychopaths love to do, I’ll cherrypick the last 20 years to show that there has [been no warming there](http://i.imgur.com/S4Kgh4k.gif), despite CO2 continuing to rise. Even using [just the satellite record](http://i.imgur.com/IF42Uf2.gif), the world isn’t warming. If we refer back to one of the hottest years in recorded history, [we see the difference.](http://i.imgur.com/4HWcKSz.gif) Never mind that there have [only been ecological benefits to rising CO2](http://www.edsanders.com/global/c02up2.htm).
>“Waaaaa! What about the ice caps!”
They’re not melting. They go through [cycles](http://i.imgur.com/px9Zr2X.jpg). 1974 had [less ice](http://i.imgur.com/ShRXILK.png) than today. Oh, and don’t listen to what [scientists](http://i.imgur.com/kMGh1nT.gif) say, [whatever you do](http://i.imgur.com/14m2Ix8.gif). Nowhere is melting out of turn, not even Greenland (where it has been [growing](http://beta.dmi.dk/en/groenland/maalinger/greenland-ice-sheet-surface-mass-budget/) for something like 30 years). Oh, and the ice cores themselves? [They show that the past was hotter.](https://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/far/wg_I/ipcc_far_wg_I_chapter_07.pdf)
>“But the sea level is rising!”
It has been [rising for 13,000 years.](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1d/Post-Glacial_Sea_Level.png) In that time, it has never risen more slowly than right now. Were our ancestors belching out CO2 faster than we were? Maybe they were farting a lot more. It’s rising more slowly than at any time in that history, and it’s also rising more slowly than [any claim](http://i.imgur.com/bNUCnvg.gif) made public by any outlet. [Here’s the source data](ftp://ftp.marine.csiro.au/pub/legresy/church_white_gmsl_2011_tg_list.zip) for that chart. It’s an FTP link, so it should automatically download the raw file (which you don’t need to worry about, as it’s a bunch of undifferentiated numbers). Turns out that [NOAA](http://i.imgur.com/H1JISaD.gif) marks the average as 0.63 mm per year. Not 3.3. Not 2.8. Certainly not a foot per year, which is needed for the most modern public “predictions” about this bullshit.
>“But ocean acidity!”
Guess what? [It’s also cyclical.](http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272771410002167)
>“Okay, not ice caps, but what about the glaciers?”
[They’ve been melting since at least the 1780s](http://i.imgur.com/UGMfILq.gif) when we started measuring them. I also have information for the Alps and other areas. Was our pre-industrial civilization responsible for “greenhouse gases” too? [There were no glaciers in Europe in the Middle Ages.](http://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/94383187) That’s called the Medieval Warm Period, something your “scientists” have been trying to erase from the record for decades (ironically, since, 1984) because it goes against their narrative. Gee, we must have had even more factories then than we do now… right?
>“But but but but but but but but muh consensus! They agree! Because I say they do! That makes what they say true!”
[Sorry, there never was any consensus.](http://www.friendsofscience.org/assets/documents/97_Consensus_Myth.pdf)
[Because they do](http://www.populartechnology.net/2009/10/peer-reviewed-papers-supporting.html) (and because [papers often aren’t published](http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs12129-009-9149-z) because the publishing groups are owned by AGW liars).
>”So what the hell is this all about?”
The [purposeful destruction](https://archive.is/i29K7) of the [economy and infrastructure](https://archive.is/95g9u) of the Western world and [only the Western world](http://archive.is/dxX5b).
***[None of the data](http://i.imgur.com/Yyx254S.gif)*** ***supports the existence of AGW.***
>“WAA! IT’S ONLY UNITED STATES TEMPERATURES!”
Because there is no other record of meaningful scientific value anywhere. Only the United States (and parts of Japan) has [a temperature record that has been around long enough](https://realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/McKitrickCriticalGHCNReview.pdf) for climatological statements can be based on it. The GHCND set of stations has slowly been closed down… and what’s this! The stations being closed down ARE FAR FROM THE EQUATOR. What does that mean? The average latitude of GHCND stations IS [FIFTEEN FUCKING DEGREES](http://i.imgur.com/yvuGBwi.gif) CLOSER TO THE EQUATOR than it used to be. Do you imagine that might raise temperatures? If you answer no, don’t bother answering in the first place.
The United States has a network of [1200+ USHCN stations](http://i.imgur.com/lX30V8X.gif) with data going back to 1895 and earlier. The raw USHCN temperature record shows that there has been a slight cooling since 1920 (see above). USHCN is a subset of GHCND (Global Historical Climatology Network Daily.) Cooling doesn’t suit the needs of your masters, so [they cherrypicked a small subset of GHCND stations](http://i.imgur.com/zUywF21.gif) (which show a large amount of warming since 1920) for use in the global GSN temperature record.
So let’s stop this madness, right? What happens when we take data from [SCIENTIFICALLY SOUND SOURCES?](http://i.imgur.com/WxjeGtP.gif) That is, 1. stations active for a long time and 2. stations that don’t move (meaning keeping the same latitude). We see what I said above. [NO. FUCKING. WARMING.](http://i.imgur.com/sk2JZuI.gif)
At the very best (for your delusions), you (meaning your own authorities) can say that [there has been zero change since modern recordings began.](https://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sar/wg_I/ipcc_sar_wg_I_full_report.pdf) Your bastard king himself, James Hansen, [ADMITTED TO THIS.](https://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/briefs/hansen_07/)
>"WAAAAAA THE DOCUMENT ENDS IN 1995!"
And yet there has been [zero](http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/rss/from:1990) warming [SINCE THEN](http://i.imgur.com/0N7BEg4.gif), too, so you don’t have a leg to stand on.
Funny how sea level is identical to 1870 and 1901, huh? ([La Jolla](http://i.imgur.com/Gkw4yCG.gif) and [La Jolla](http://i.imgur.com/M1D5yMu.jpg); [Sydney](http://i.imgur.com/beYZsdR.gif) and [Sydney](http://i.imgur.com/ecilgkv.gif), respectively)? Funny how [all the gauges](https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/mslGlobalTrendsTable.htm) show [a 0.63mm/yr rise](http://i.imgur.com/TS4MYXU.gif) (which, again, is smaller than at any time in the last 11,000 years). Not 3.3. Not 2.6. Not 1.4. Certainly not “a meter by 2050.”
>“But weather is becoming more extreme!”
Nah, less. Universally. What’s more, do you imagine? Not [fires](https://www.fs.fed.us/research/sustain/criteria-indicators/indicators/indicator-316.php). [Ha](http://i.imgur.com/hrnfDBC.jpg)! Not [floods](https://water.usgs.gov/floods/events/2015/Joaquin/HolmesQA.html).
>USGS research has shown no linkage between flooding (either increases or decreases) and the increase in greenhouse gases. Essentially, from USGS long-term streamgage data for sites across the country with no regulation or other changes to the watershed that could influence the streamflow, the data shows no systematic increases in flooding through time.
Not [tornadoes](http://www.spc.noaa.gov/wcm/). Five (nearly six now) consecutive [years](http://i.imgur.com/cYdfjJP.png) of below average events. Not [hurricanes](http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/hurdat/All_U.S._Hurricanes.html). Every [single](http://i.imgur.com/MeTkQa8.png) indicator [shows](http://i.imgur.com/jdS93uF.png) they’re not only becoming [less frequent](http://i.imgur.com/0TCxneE.png), but also less powerful. Not even [drought](http://www.mercurynews.com/2014/01/30/graphic-californias-droughts-in-the-past-1200-years/). [Hilarious](http://i.imgur.com/Xuq8mo6.gif)! So what is it? What’s worse? Tell us. Is it anything at all? Anywhere? At any time? No. Of course, [this has been](http://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/1298497) known for [a while](http://i.imgur.com/0Vahnon.gif). It’s [global cooling’s](http://i.imgur.com/LBAGLs4.gif) fault, [after](http://i.imgur.com/94wMMS3.jpg) all! [Oh, wait…](http://i.imgur.com/rTKiP7j.gif) NOAA [wouldn’t](http://archives.chicagotribune.com/1981/11/25/page/27/article/perspective/) want you to [hear this](https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=2199&dat=19790311&id=tIwyAAAAIBAJ&sjid=JecFAAAAIBAJ&pg=6679,1789504&hl=en) now, would they?
Elon unbanned white nationalists from his platform.
Zuckerberg is funding the age verification movement - Epstein funded a study on whether pulling away sexual outlets caused more pregnancies.
Epstein created /pol/.
Epstein's extremely close friend and political advisor Bannon openly speaks against Israel.
Bannon backed a publicly known list of parties, all linked by natalism.
Charlie Cuck (now dead) planned CPAC Hungary to advance the agenda that Epstein funded Fidesz to push.
Peter Thiel backs Vance, who publicly stated that all Americans should aspire to be married with kids. Again, Epstein narrative. Higher birth rates. It's the vein running through the entire movement. It links the Mandelson set with the Musk/Thiel set.
The narrative doesn't fit reality. But you already know that. You're a piss poor parody account, probably an alt of either JG5 or everyone's favorite Heritage employee, Kaarous.
1 month ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)1 child
Thanks for admitting that [jews](https://archive.is/i29K7) invented the [hoax](https://archive.is/95g9u) to cause [white genocide](https://archive.is/dxX5b). Blow your brains out, subhuman.
u/GoldenInnosStatue Sorry to bother you so soon again, but this is TheImpossible1 as an alt. You probably know that. Were we keeping him around as a joke? I can’t remember.
Land “readings” are [diverging](http://i.imgur.com/8RwdDFT.png) from satellite data (which [NASA itself says is more accurate](http://i.imgur.com/OISZ078.png) and should be the standard instead) because over 40% of land “readings” are estimates made for places ***without recording equipment.*** To illustratively do something that the psychopaths love to do, I’ll cherrypick the last 20 years to show that there has [been no warming there](http://i.imgur.com/S4Kgh4k.gif), despite CO2 continuing to rise. Even using [just the satellite record](http://i.imgur.com/IF42Uf2.gif), the world isn’t warming. If we refer back to one of the hottest years in recorded history, [we see the difference.](http://i.imgur.com/4HWcKSz.gif) Never mind that there have [only been ecological benefits to rising CO2](http://www.edsanders.com/global/c02up2.htm).
>“Waaaaa! What about the ice caps!”
They’re not melting. They go through [cycles](http://i.imgur.com/px9Zr2X.jpg). 1974 had [less ice](http://i.imgur.com/ShRXILK.png) than today. Oh, and don’t listen to what [scientists](http://i.imgur.com/kMGh1nT.gif) say, [whatever you do](http://i.imgur.com/14m2Ix8.gif). Nowhere is melting out of turn, not even Greenland (where it has been [growing](http://beta.dmi.dk/en/groenland/maalinger/greenland-ice-sheet-surface-mass-budget/) for something like 30 years). Oh, and the ice cores themselves? [They show that the past was hotter.](https://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/far/wg_I/ipcc_far_wg_I_chapter_07.pdf)
>“But the sea level is rising!”
It has been [rising for 13,000 years.](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1d/Post-Glacial_Sea_Level.png) In that time, it has never risen more slowly than right now. Were our ancestors belching out CO2 faster than we were? Maybe they were farting a lot more. It’s rising more slowly than at any time in that history, and it’s also rising more slowly than [any claim](http://i.imgur.com/bNUCnvg.gif) made public by any outlet. [Here’s the source data](ftp://ftp.marine.csiro.au/pub/legresy/church_white_gmsl_2011_tg_list.zip) for that chart. It’s an FTP link, so it should automatically download the raw file (which you don’t need to worry about, as it’s a bunch of undifferentiated numbers). Turns out that [NOAA](http://i.imgur.com/H1JISaD.gif) marks the average as 0.63 mm per year. Not 3.3. Not 2.8. Certainly not a foot per year, which is needed for the most modern public “predictions” about this bullshit.
>“But ocean acidity!”
Guess what? [It’s also cyclical.](http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272771410002167)
>“Okay, not ice caps, but what about the glaciers?”
[They’ve been melting since at least the 1780s](http://i.imgur.com/UGMfILq.gif) when we started measuring them. I also have information for the Alps and other areas. Was our pre-industrial civilization responsible for “greenhouse gases” too? [There were no glaciers in Europe in the Middle Ages.](http://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/94383187) That’s called the Medieval Warm Period, something your “scientists” have been trying to erase from the record for decades (ironically, since, 1984) because it goes against their narrative. Gee, we must have had even more factories then than we do now… right?
>“But but but but but but but but muh consensus! They agree! Because I say they do! That makes what they say true!”
[Sorry, there never was any consensus.](http://www.friendsofscience.org/assets/documents/97_Consensus_Myth.pdf)
>“Then why don’t climate change deniers publish papers?”
[Because they do](http://www.populartechnology.net/2009/10/peer-reviewed-papers-supporting.html) (and because [papers often aren’t published](http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs12129-009-9149-z) because the publishing groups are owned by AGW liars).
>”So what the hell is this all about?”
The [purposeful destruction](https://archive.is/i29K7) of the [economy and infrastructure](https://archive.is/95g9u) of the Western world and [only the Western world](http://archive.is/dxX5b).
***[None of the data](http://i.imgur.com/Yyx254S.gif)*** ***supports the existence of AGW.***
>“WAA! IT’S ONLY UNITED STATES TEMPERATURES!”
Because there is no other record of meaningful scientific value anywhere. Only the United States (and parts of Japan) has [a temperature record that has been around long enough](https://realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/McKitrickCriticalGHCNReview.pdf) for climatological statements can be based on it. The GHCND set of stations has slowly been closed down… and what’s this! The stations being closed down ARE FAR FROM THE EQUATOR. What does that mean? The average latitude of GHCND stations IS [FIFTEEN FUCKING DEGREES](http://i.imgur.com/yvuGBwi.gif) CLOSER TO THE EQUATOR than it used to be. Do you imagine that might raise temperatures? If you answer no, don’t bother answering in the first place.
The United States has a network of [1200+ USHCN stations](http://i.imgur.com/lX30V8X.gif) with data going back to 1895 and earlier. The raw USHCN temperature record shows that there has been a slight cooling since 1920 (see above). USHCN is a subset of GHCND (Global Historical Climatology Network Daily.) Cooling doesn’t suit the needs of your masters, so [they cherrypicked a small subset of GHCND stations](http://i.imgur.com/zUywF21.gif) (which show a large amount of warming since 1920) for use in the global GSN temperature record.
So let’s stop this madness, right? What happens when we take data from [SCIENTIFICALLY SOUND SOURCES?](http://i.imgur.com/WxjeGtP.gif) That is, 1. stations active for a long time and 2. stations that don’t move (meaning keeping the same latitude). We see what I said above. [NO. FUCKING. WARMING.](http://i.imgur.com/sk2JZuI.gif)
At the very best (for your delusions), you (meaning your own authorities) can say that [there has been zero change since modern recordings began.](https://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sar/wg_I/ipcc_sar_wg_I_full_report.pdf) Your bastard king himself, James Hansen, [ADMITTED TO THIS.](https://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/briefs/hansen_07/)
>"WAAAAAA THE DOCUMENT ENDS IN 1995!"
And yet there has been [zero](http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/rss/from:1990) warming [SINCE THEN](http://i.imgur.com/0N7BEg4.gif), too, so you don’t have a leg to stand on.
Funny how sea level is identical to 1870 and 1901, huh? ([La Jolla](http://i.imgur.com/Gkw4yCG.gif) and [La Jolla](http://i.imgur.com/M1D5yMu.jpg); [Sydney](http://i.imgur.com/beYZsdR.gif) and [Sydney](http://i.imgur.com/ecilgkv.gif), respectively)? Funny how [all the gauges](https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/mslGlobalTrendsTable.htm) show [a 0.63mm/yr rise](http://i.imgur.com/TS4MYXU.gif) (which, again, is smaller than at any time in the last 11,000 years). Not 3.3. Not 2.6. Not 1.4. Certainly not “a meter by 2050.”
>“But weather is becoming more extreme!”
Nah, less. Universally. What’s more, do you imagine? Not [fires](https://www.fs.fed.us/research/sustain/criteria-indicators/indicators/indicator-316.php). [Ha](http://i.imgur.com/hrnfDBC.jpg)! Not [floods](https://water.usgs.gov/floods/events/2015/Joaquin/HolmesQA.html).
>USGS research has shown no linkage between flooding (either increases or decreases) and the increase in greenhouse gases. Essentially, from USGS long-term streamgage data for sites across the country with no regulation or other changes to the watershed that could influence the streamflow, the data shows no systematic increases in flooding through time.
Not [tornadoes](http://www.spc.noaa.gov/wcm/). Five (nearly six now) consecutive [years](http://i.imgur.com/cYdfjJP.png) of below average events. Not [hurricanes](http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/hurdat/All_U.S._Hurricanes.html). Every [single](http://i.imgur.com/MeTkQa8.png) indicator [shows](http://i.imgur.com/jdS93uF.png) they’re not only becoming [less frequent](http://i.imgur.com/0TCxneE.png), but also less powerful. Not even [drought](http://www.mercurynews.com/2014/01/30/graphic-californias-droughts-in-the-past-1200-years/). [Hilarious](http://i.imgur.com/Xuq8mo6.gif)! So what is it? What’s worse? Tell us. Is it anything at all? Anywhere? At any time? No. Of course, [this has been](http://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/1298497) known for [a while](http://i.imgur.com/0Vahnon.gif). It’s [global cooling’s](http://i.imgur.com/LBAGLs4.gif) fault, [after](http://i.imgur.com/94wMMS3.jpg) all! [Oh, wait…](http://i.imgur.com/rTKiP7j.gif) NOAA [wouldn’t](http://archives.chicagotribune.com/1981/11/25/page/27/article/perspective/) want you to [hear this](https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=2199&dat=19790311&id=tIwyAAAAIBAJ&sjid=JecFAAAAIBAJ&pg=6679,1789504&hl=en) now, would they?
Musk -> X -> white nationalism, natalism and other undesirable ideologies beloved by Epstein.
Now run along little pedophile.
Come on, man. Get it together. You're better than this.
The Movement was filled with white nationalist parties focused on punishing those without kids.
Blow your brains out, subhuman.
I don't think that even you believe the bullshit you're saying.
Zuckerberg is funding the age verification movement - Epstein funded a study on whether pulling away sexual outlets caused more pregnancies.
Epstein created /pol/.
Epstein's extremely close friend and political advisor Bannon openly speaks against Israel.
Bannon backed a publicly known list of parties, all linked by natalism.
Charlie Cuck (now dead) planned CPAC Hungary to advance the agenda that Epstein funded Fidesz to push.
Peter Thiel backs Vance, who publicly stated that all Americans should aspire to be married with kids. Again, Epstein narrative. Higher birth rates. It's the vein running through the entire movement. It links the Mandelson set with the Musk/Thiel set.
The narrative doesn't fit reality. But you already know that. You're a piss poor parody account, probably an alt of either JG5 or everyone's favorite Heritage employee, Kaarous.
Off yourself.
u/GoldenInnosStatue Sorry to bother you so soon again, but this is TheImpossible1 as an alt. You probably know that. Were we keeping him around as a joke? I can’t remember.