Consume Product

Here is the difference between hitler and modern politicians.

They are all liberals. Yes, I rag on liberals more than anyone else. I despise what you would call "classical liberalism" or modern liberalism. But this is strictly anglosphere liberalism. Hitler was a liberal that was born from the direct evolution of Thomas Hobbes (ironically an English man, but Hobbes' work was more influential outside of England. The anglosphere took on John Locke) onwards. Protestant countries in general largely took on lockean principles, but England and the Netherlands did first.

The liberalism of fascism is liberty through the state instead of in spite of the state. Fascism follows the "rousseau-ist" principle of the state as a living organism that exists through the general will. Note: Rousseau's belief in the state existing as general will was an absolute conundrum that nobody knew how to actually implement because rousseau never explained how, and societies imploded in an attempt to do so (french revolution. Most notably). Until fascistic syndicalism and corporatism came around to finally give an answer to that 200 year old question. Although indeed quite divulged from its roots, as that strain of liberalism had been filtered through at least 4-5 different philosophers by the time giovanni gentile talked about it. But the "Rousseau-ist" conception of the state remained largely untouched as theory per se.

What this means is that hitler, mussolini, and others were far more tied to the interests of the people instead of their own individual gain. Lockean, individualistic liberalism is probably the worst thing that has ever been thought of in the history of the west. What this also means, inversely, is that other western post-enlightenment leaders took on the mantle of individualistic liberalism. They viewed politics as a way to gain something for themselves because this was their worldview.

That means that the classical liberal, now largely neoliberal, leaders of the west were able to be bought out. Sold. Influenced by jews. Jews exploited them by appealing to their desires for the gain of jewry. They are evil to children because morality does not exist in the individualist worldview, jews tell them they will get something if they do it, so they do. It rewards unscrupulous individuals instead of punishing them.

Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed

Is this a colorized version of a real picture?