Daily? look up stats, it's 2-3 black on White murders per hour. black on White rapes is like 1 every 10 minutes.
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
15 comments:
1
29 days ago
1 point
(+0
/
-0
/
+1Score on mirror
)
1 child
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
1
29 days ago
1 point
(+0
/
-0
/
+1Score on mirror
)
1 child
I don’t doubt it. Do you have any stats on that? Would love to have that if you have it.
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
28 days ago
0 points
(+0
/
-0
)
Yes fbi dude grow a brain
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
It's been this way for a looooooong time
It was way worse in the 70s
What happened in the 90s that reduced crime rates against whites? A resurgence of "antiquated" notions about the 2A.
If you are American, ABC. Never go anywhere you can't be armed.
Better to be tried by a jury than in a box.
It was way worse in the 70s
What happened in the 90s that reduced crime rates against whites? A resurgence of "antiquated" notions about the 2A.
If you are American, ABC. Never go anywhere you can't be armed.
Better to be tried by a jury than in a box.
And? These are self-inflicted accidents. It's like a baseline of deaths that just occur.
Getting murdered by feral niggers isn't something we should tolerate, as if it's just another death inducing effect that befalls us.
Getting murdered by feral niggers isn't something we should tolerate, as if it's just another death inducing effect that befalls us.
Choosing to ignore crime because it's rare is not a victory of utilitarianism over fallacy. We aren't correspondingly jurisprudentially vexed about the spread of renal cancer because renal cancer is not a human criminal.
*Statistically speaking,* niggers are about as deadly as hepatitis, so, by your logic, I guess we can at least at start treating them as just another run-of-the-mill disease for heckin' science to eradicate while we performatively deny that non-modal events occur, because It's 250 years past the revolution and enlightenment, we're all just blase about probability and that's ezpz risk management.
*Statistically speaking,* niggers are about as deadly as hepatitis, so, by your logic, I guess we can at least at start treating them as just another run-of-the-mill disease for heckin' science to eradicate while we performatively deny that non-modal events occur, because It's 250 years past the revolution and enlightenment, we're all just blase about probability and that's ezpz risk management.
Triglycerides are not human and possess zero human moral agency. Stop insinuating there is no difference between human crime and natural disease, and stop trying to change the subject. You are overrelying on probability as a materialist crutch and as a result you are jaded, seeing the world as an arbitrary superposition of meaningless statistical happenstances. You are trying to show off how little you have to care about someone's death as long as you can cough up an actuarial model which suffices to pass blame for it away from yourself and on to arbitrary statistical noise. You are pursuing the power to deny human life and attempting to use that power to shield yourself from culpability in the needless deaths that you are enabling. You don't get to take the needless murder of innocent White people and make it about natural disease, then dismiss it as statistically minimal now that you've compared it to something utterly irrelevant to it. You don't even seem to care whether I live longer than the next calendar year. Your behavior is antisocial, dishonest, and immoral. Stop lying to yourself. Stop staring at cards and look at the basic reality the numbers are telling you; 1 in 172k per annum is not that low, for any cause of death, even a natural one.
Toast message