You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
10
Hematomato on scored.co
6 hours ago10 points(+0/-0/+10Score on mirror)3 children
Rape has turned into some bizarre spectrum, where it now runs all the way from "forcible sex against a terrified and struggling person" to "failing to be completely obedient and deferential to any and all women."
5 hours ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)3 children
If you read feminist literature, you'd know that rape to them is any case of sex in which the man has any sort of power/leverage.
Feminists believe all sex should be 100% controlled by the woman without any pressure whatsoever.
A hot man who has leverage to pick the woman he wants to have sex with is raping women but feminists let it fly because he's hot. A John paying a prostitute is raping her because he gets to choose the woman to have sex with despite this being a consensual and fair transaction agreed upon by two adults.
Feminists want men to have 0 power whatsoever and essentially be slaves to women. If they aren't and the exude any sort of presence to gain something they want which involves sex with a woman then it's rape.
Women don't actually like men that don't rape them because rape proves he's powerful and women only like powerful men. Their whole game is trying to make men submit to them so that once a man refuses to submit and rapes her, she knows he was worthy of her pusseta
Things have changed in the last twelve years. Thirteen years ago, the rule was simply "if she says no, stop." Today it's closer to "if she's feeling nervous, you're already raping her."
I don't object to the feminism of 20, 40, 60 years ago. But the wave that started twelve years ago is ahborrent.
4 hours ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)1 child
Rolling feminism back 20 years will just result in men 20 years in the future having to deal with what we're currently stuck with. No, for the sake of the future we need a final solution to end the feminist ideology.
So, to be clear, you want to go back to roughly 1830, where women couldn't own property, go out in public without permission, choose how to dress, choose who to marry, sign legal contracts, just none of that? You're looking for a full "all women are slaves to men from birth" arrangement, Afghanistan-style?
3 hours ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)1 child
It's so they can pump the numbers up of White men rapists. Expanding the definition dilutes the niggers and brings Whites into the statistics. It also makes more women "victims" so they can also say they were raped with first hand knowledge, when it's complete hasabara
Feminists believe all sex should be 100% controlled by the woman without any pressure whatsoever.
A hot man who has leverage to pick the woman he wants to have sex with is raping women but feminists let it fly because he's hot. A John paying a prostitute is raping her because he gets to choose the woman to have sex with despite this being a consensual and fair transaction agreed upon by two adults.
Feminists want men to have 0 power whatsoever and essentially be slaves to women. If they aren't and the exude any sort of presence to gain something they want which involves sex with a woman then it's rape.
despite how much they preach against rape, they're addicted to it.
I don't object to the feminism of 20, 40, 60 years ago. But the wave that started twelve years ago is ahborrent.