Consume Product

None of that makes any sense whatsoever.

'Survival': If it means individual survival, and they marry Whites, they will be less likely to be murdered than if they marry nons. Ergo, individual survival is better served not marrying nons. (Left-Wing morons probably aren't aware of the sheer difference in murder rates across racial lines, which might explain why this point might 'make sense' to them, i.e. they probably think that South Asians are *less* murderous than Whites.)

If it means collective survival, how is that under threat when there are far more Indians than all European peoples combined? Whites have far more justification for in-group preference on that count.

'Cultural preservation': The best way to preserve South Asian culture, whatever that is, definitely does not involve leaving South Asia.

Why does 'cultural preservation' only matter for nons, especially when European peoples have a plurality of cultures and South Asians are essentially culturally homogeneous? People don't talk about 'northern Indian culture' and 'southern Indian culture' as though they are different, the way they talk about French culture and German culture. They say: 'Tonight, I am going to eat Indian food', not 'tonight, I am going to choose between Bengali food and Keralan food'. India is so homogenized that people just see 'Indian culture' and 'Indian food', without any kind of subdivisions.

'Fear of loss' - Who even knows what that means? Loss of what? Loss of their own culture? That goes the other way as well: just look at Vance, completely mired in Indian culture, doesn't get along with his White blood relatives, his kids have Indian names, etc. Why are your fears about cultural loss relevant when it is far less threatened?

I wonder what 'dominance' these idiots even think that Whites still have? Whites can't control their own borders, hence almost every European country having large numbers of people complaining about the very real masses of illegal immigrants. A White man can't even control his own wife and kids, and yet he's apparently controlling the 'patriarchy' (how a man who can't even control one woman at any time can control *all* women all of the time is anyone's guess) and, even more laughably, the whole world. Nons are everywhere in White countries—even in government—while the vast majority of non-white countries have no White population, etc. The thought of India electing a White man the way that America elected Obama is practically inconceivable.

Indeed, at the moment, Whites are so pathetically weak that they can't even expel kikes, while their ancestors were expelling and killing kikes whenever kikes did something wrong. Our ancestors weren't liberals who rejected collective punishment like today's psychologically disarmed fools. (For further details on some of the yid crimes and the punishments they received, see my old comment on the history of the kikes in Britain pre-1290: https://scored.co/c/ConsumeProduct/p/1ARczBKife/i-got-suspended-on-shidder-for-p/c/4eXvGkjVqaN)

Whites have been psychologically disarmed a long time ago: if they weren't, we wouldn't be here on this website still trying to figure out how to psychologically rearm them. Instead, we'd be in the halls of power ensuring that every worthless ideologist and parasite with a name like 'Kaur' (civic nationalist idiots like Tommy Robinson probably love this stupid woman because her name is Sikh, not Muslim) is moved as far away from us as possible. Whether they move to India, to Africa (not that niggers like these worthless Indians), or to the bottom of the ocean (not that the valuable lifeforms down there would like them either), it really doesn't matter.

You can complain about 'dominance' if and when we're able to secure all of our national borders, deport all Kaurs from the country, and eradicate kikes. If we never manage that, complaining about 'dominance' is just weak and pathetic, kicking people who are already down rather than up and fighting. You're still afraid of Whites even when they're—by far—at the weakest point they've been in millennia. How fragile nons must be if they feel yet weaker still.