Consume Product

Because they're Indian

Have you seen their women? I don’t blame them.

Because they're not much more than animals themselves.

> Some sculptures depict humans with animals in erotic poses. These are generally interpreted as symbolic, satirical, or part of folk narratives, not endorsements of bestiality.

> In contemporary Hinduism, bestiality is universally condemned as unethical, illegal, and spiritually degrading.

> Legal frameworks in India, influenced by Hindu ethical principles, criminalize bestiality under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code (now reinterpreted but still applicable to non-consensual acts) and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act.

> Hinduism unequivocally prohibits bestiality in its major legal and ethical texts, known as the Dharmashastras.

Well it sounds like if there are sculptures they are not meant to approve of the practice, and the practice - if widespread in any way - is contrary to hinduism (and I would presume Buddhism which also emphasizes a value on being celibate)

> Buddhism explicitly opposes bestiality through the Third Precept: abstaining from sexual misconduct (kāmesu micchācārā). This precept prohibits any sexual act that causes harm, violates trust, or exploits others—including animals.

A few years ago, some Indian degenerate filmed himself raping his grandfather, thinking he would gain popularity because people would laugh along. "Yeah man, it was hilarious the way you sexually assaulted a family member and pretended to be a faggot."