Not Michelangelo's David or the Venus de Milo? Bob Ross, really?
I can appreciate a White body at peak physical fitness, as God intended us, male or female alike (there are no other options there). Again, it's not a sexual thing. I'm not a coomer degenerate despite my username.
I never understood why Vatican has statues of naked baby boys with wangs out and angel wings. I don't think the Bible described angels this way. I don't like those fountains of boys peeing either
Those were before the church was (((subverted))). There was nothing shameful or indecent about a human body before then. Some Renaissance paintings even depicted the infant Christ in the nude, along with John the Baptist, and nobody thought anything remotely "sexual" about it - you'd likely be hospitalized if not recommended for an exorcism saying otherwise.
It was the loxist cryptojew Cromwell that introduced puritan notions of "modesty" later.
If you prefer to admire the male physique, no loin cloth, then you might be just a little bit gay. You could collect statues of naked women instead?
I can appreciate a White body at peak physical fitness, as God intended us, male or female alike (there are no other options there). Again, it's not a sexual thing. I'm not a coomer degenerate despite my username.
It was the loxist cryptojew Cromwell that introduced puritan notions of "modesty" later.