You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
TheMafia on scored.co
1 day ago0 points(+0/-0)1 child
> are things that humans pretty much lived without until the Neolithic
Yea. On Earth. Where your next breath can actually be taken for granted; but, you need to have 12 children because only 4 will survive. It was _fucking brutal_.
> We would have probably found out a way to colonize it already
What you want to do is go look at the spacecraft manuals. NASA just publishes these. Go read how toilet malfunctions are handled.
You've got stars in your eyes. To colonize something you actually have to move human bodies there. It's the same reason they packed slave ships so full in antiquity. Lots of them are just going to die. To make it economically viable you just need to accept this and throw corpses overboard during the journey.
Or you can spend $1b per astronaut as we will for the current Artemis moon missions. That's just to the moon. If you don't have $1t to get to Mars you will _not_ be on the "first class" accommodations.
> but their space program
Is pure propaganda. It mostly doesn't exist. Certainly not in the way their broadcasts portray.
> I consider that Israel must be destroyed
Yet you capitalize it and spell it correctly. I wouldn't even show isreal that kind of respect.
>You've got stars in your eyes. To colonize something you actually have to move human bodies there. It's the same reason they packed slave ships so full in antiquity. Lots of them are just going to die. To make it economically viable you just need to accept this and throw corpses overboard during the journey.
I know and thats... exactly what I'm saying. To simply move bodies somewhere without proper medication is well within the realm of possibility.
>Yea. On Earth. Where your next breath can actually be taken for granted
Yes. The thing is that you can breathe on earth in the first place. Which is my main point that the primary issue with colonizing Mars is the fact that it is literally unliveable and we do not have any of the technology to make it liveable. We struggle with reversing desertification on earth. What about Mars? Having no medication for people can be mitigated by sending a shit ton of people (volunteers or otherwise, like the colonies in the americas) and hoping for the best, the problem is that the planet, which is a cold and inhospitable desert, has to be made to support life in any sense whatsoever. To further complicate this, it would more than likely have to be robots/rovers that do the work of making Mars liveable because, well, the hypothetical people would obviously freeze to death and die immediately.
>but, you need to have 12 children because only 4 will survive. It was fucking brutal.
We agree. If we endured the brutality then we can endure it again. But in order to endure it, the place that were enduring it in has to be inhabitable at all, which is the problem in question. Ideally, of course, we'd develop medicine and whatever else along the way, but it's not the primary concern when as of current you'd be sending people to their deaths, medicine or not, perfectly working toilets or not.
>Is pure propaganda. It mostly doesn't exist. Certainly not in the way their broadcasts portray.
It's promising because china actually has legitimate engineers and legitimate goals to accomplish, the fact that they actually want to do shit and probably will one day be able to do it, and the trajectory of china in general recently. NASA is owned by jews and full of niggers. Roscosmos may as well not even exist anymore. Those are the next two biggest space programs and also the former grandmasters of space exploration. SpaceX is a jew billionaire's side-quest, it doesn't count.
>Yet you capitalize it and spell it correctly. I wouldn't even show isreal that kind of respect.
Apologies, I'm on mobile.
Furthermore, I consider that israel must be destroyed
Yea. On Earth. Where your next breath can actually be taken for granted; but, you need to have 12 children because only 4 will survive. It was _fucking brutal_.
> We would have probably found out a way to colonize it already
What you want to do is go look at the spacecraft manuals. NASA just publishes these. Go read how toilet malfunctions are handled.
You've got stars in your eyes. To colonize something you actually have to move human bodies there. It's the same reason they packed slave ships so full in antiquity. Lots of them are just going to die. To make it economically viable you just need to accept this and throw corpses overboard during the journey.
Or you can spend $1b per astronaut as we will for the current Artemis moon missions. That's just to the moon. If you don't have $1t to get to Mars you will _not_ be on the "first class" accommodations.
> but their space program
Is pure propaganda. It mostly doesn't exist. Certainly not in the way their broadcasts portray.
> I consider that Israel must be destroyed
Yet you capitalize it and spell it correctly. I wouldn't even show isreal that kind of respect.
I know and thats... exactly what I'm saying. To simply move bodies somewhere without proper medication is well within the realm of possibility.
>Yea. On Earth. Where your next breath can actually be taken for granted
Yes. The thing is that you can breathe on earth in the first place. Which is my main point that the primary issue with colonizing Mars is the fact that it is literally unliveable and we do not have any of the technology to make it liveable. We struggle with reversing desertification on earth. What about Mars? Having no medication for people can be mitigated by sending a shit ton of people (volunteers or otherwise, like the colonies in the americas) and hoping for the best, the problem is that the planet, which is a cold and inhospitable desert, has to be made to support life in any sense whatsoever. To further complicate this, it would more than likely have to be robots/rovers that do the work of making Mars liveable because, well, the hypothetical people would obviously freeze to death and die immediately.
>but, you need to have 12 children because only 4 will survive. It was fucking brutal.
We agree. If we endured the brutality then we can endure it again. But in order to endure it, the place that were enduring it in has to be inhabitable at all, which is the problem in question. Ideally, of course, we'd develop medicine and whatever else along the way, but it's not the primary concern when as of current you'd be sending people to their deaths, medicine or not, perfectly working toilets or not.
>Is pure propaganda. It mostly doesn't exist. Certainly not in the way their broadcasts portray.
It's promising because china actually has legitimate engineers and legitimate goals to accomplish, the fact that they actually want to do shit and probably will one day be able to do it, and the trajectory of china in general recently. NASA is owned by jews and full of niggers. Roscosmos may as well not even exist anymore. Those are the next two biggest space programs and also the former grandmasters of space exploration. SpaceX is a jew billionaire's side-quest, it doesn't count.
>Yet you capitalize it and spell it correctly. I wouldn't even show isreal that kind of respect.
Apologies, I'm on mobile.
Furthermore, I consider that israel must be destroyed