Microchimerism
(media.scored.co)
This bullshit again?
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
46 comments:
Found the whore taking unprotected loads
What kind of gay MGTOW shit are you talking about?
Show me on this teddy bear where the MGTOW touched you 🧸
White people are about to collapse in population. Propaganda is pushed that women can store DNA in a way not biologically possible. This is done to demoralize the males to prevent them from seeking to reproduce. As a result, the population collapses further. This is done under the guise of MGTOW, which is a faggot movement designed to make sure that the white population reaches total collapse.
On top of all of this, filthy shit skins encourage the MGTOW propaganda as they know it reduces the chances of white males reproducing. This gives them a biological chance of seeking out a white female.
All of this is kikery. It's 100% kike bullshit. Anyone who disagrees is a faggot that needs to be removed permanently from the genepool.
To summarize all of this, I'm not impressed by your faggotry. Kill yourself.
On top of all of this, filthy shit skins encourage the MGTOW propaganda as they know it reduces the chances of white males reproducing. This gives them a biological chance of seeking out a white female.
All of this is kikery. It's 100% kike bullshit. Anyone who disagrees is a faggot that needs to be removed permanently from the genepool.
To summarize all of this, I'm not impressed by your faggotry. Kill yourself.
There is one way to be certain about this phenomenon existing, and that's coal-burning women who then had a White men, and the offspring becomes ~1/4 nigger. I haven't heard of the phenomenon of children being too nigger even though they should be 0% nigger - they are either the result of outright cheating (50% nigger) or not at all.
Otherwise this phenomenon is explained by women seeking men who are similar to them (fitting them), but are also similar to each other. Thus man 2 will have a similar genetic setup as man 1 does, both of whom fucked the same woman. The conclusion could be made that man 2 is cucking with the genes of man 1, but actually they are just similar.
Otherwise this phenomenon is explained by women seeking men who are similar to them (fitting them), but are also similar to each other. Thus man 2 will have a similar genetic setup as man 1 does, both of whom fucked the same woman. The conclusion could be made that man 2 is cucking with the genes of man 1, but actually they are just similar.
Here's a post about this bs from last year where I debunked it:
https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/19BZz54Hbk/not-even-animals-do-this-kind-of/c/4eU47QMJgLm?d=50
TLDR: Sperm is haploid. It does not contain DNA. it does not divide/reproduce. Microchimerism can only be caused by interchanging full DNA cells with another person in such a way that the immune system doesn't immediately recognize them as foreign and eliminate them. Organ transplants would be a good example.
https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/19BZz54Hbk/not-even-animals-do-this-kind-of/c/4eU47QMJgLm?d=50
TLDR: Sperm is haploid. It does not contain DNA. it does not divide/reproduce. Microchimerism can only be caused by interchanging full DNA cells with another person in such a way that the immune system doesn't immediately recognize them as foreign and eliminate them. Organ transplants would be a good example.
Aristotle knew this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telegony_(inheritance)
I read this greentext a while ago. Didn't reread but figured I would comment to balance the people calling it BS. Stone Choir did a good episode on it as well: https://stone-choir.com/against-the-clockwork-universe/
I read this greentext a while ago. Didn't reread but figured I would comment to balance the people calling it BS. Stone Choir did a good episode on it as well: https://stone-choir.com/against-the-clockwork-universe/
My education may be in Nuclear systems but my meager knowledge in biology tells me this is bullshit.
Wait until you all discover DNA doesn’t exist and the entire foundation was fabricated by jews and not a single study ever replicated their results.
Breeding livestock, I quickly realized that the colostrum is way more important than genetics.
If you mess up the mother's health at birth, genetics can't make up the difference. Only healthy children from healthy mothers can show genetics differences.
Potential fathers: take charge of your wife's health.
If you mess up the mother's health at birth, genetics can't make up the difference. Only healthy children from healthy mothers can show genetics differences.
Potential fathers: take charge of your wife's health.
Yup. My health has suffered to ensure the health of my wife being as best as it can be (paying for special workout classes and taking care of the kids already born as she does them). From such I dont workout as much as I used to. I still am in an elite bracket when it comes to my physical performance but I could lose 10lbs of fat and be about 14% body fat again
This makes perfect evolutionary sense.
DNA loves to reproduce. It's its only function. Why wouldn't DNA love this? It would take the best genes from multiple males, and as far as DNA is concerned, any sperm that has managed to enter the woman's body must be the best sperm, because mating is the prize for winning in nature.
DNA loves to reproduce. It's its only function. Why wouldn't DNA love this? It would take the best genes from multiple males, and as far as DNA is concerned, any sperm that has managed to enter the woman's body must be the best sperm, because mating is the prize for winning in nature.
Sperm doesn't have DNA in it. It's haploid. It's not possible for sperm cells or their genetic content to spontaneously reproduce.
It's a load of shit that is debooonked by a basic understanding of high school biology. Sperm cells cannot replicate themselves when they are mature. Diploid cells (IE normal cells) can, but gametes cannot. As soon as your sperm cells are ready to come out of your body, it is impossible for them to divide anymore. Sperm also, obviously, has a limited life just like every other cell. Sperm is dead after 5 days when it is inside of a woman and doesn't find an egg, and it never travels outside of the reproductive organs.
It is completely retarded to even assume that sperm can somehow, magically, find a way into the brain and live there for your entire life. Even if the sperm somehow survived and traveled to your nervous system (biologically impossible by the way), the defenses of the CNS would go absolutely apeshit about a foreign entity's sperm cells going anywhere near the brain and kill it immediately.
And even if we assumed everything else is true, and that sperm could survive forever in the female body because reasons, an egg can still only be fertilized by one sperm cell. It cannot be fertilized by another. The dna of a child *only* comes from one egg of the mother and one sperm of the father. If we presumed this theory to be true, then pregnancy success rate should be at nearly 100% because apparently an unlimited number of sperm cells can attach to an infinite number of ovum. I know that this isn't the argument presented here, but I have seen this argument put forth before as well. My other dissertation should be proof enough for why gametes entering a fetus is physically impossible.
Actual science: promiscuity leads to higher divorce rates. And the obvious, promiscuity leads to more diseases. Spouting off a bunch of horseshit that is fake and retarded makes the entire argument against something appear to be entirely in bad faith and based on bunk science and quackery.
Male microchimerism is real, but it comes from other sources of cells that are not gametes. Blood transfusions, organ donations, sharing needles (for junkies), things like that. Things that cross contaminate cells that can actually survive and reproduce, and even then it isnt a guarantee, because the immune system still works overtime to ensure that the fetus is as safe as possible. Also, dna left behind from past fetuses in the body. Dna that got left over from a fetus before birth, miscarriage, or abortion. Theoretically possible but very improbable that the leftover dna from a past fetus will enter a new one. But, back to the point, the way that gametes work makes microchimerism via intercourse functionally impossible.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
It is completely retarded to even assume that sperm can somehow, magically, find a way into the brain and live there for your entire life. Even if the sperm somehow survived and traveled to your nervous system (biologically impossible by the way), the defenses of the CNS would go absolutely apeshit about a foreign entity's sperm cells going anywhere near the brain and kill it immediately.
And even if we assumed everything else is true, and that sperm could survive forever in the female body because reasons, an egg can still only be fertilized by one sperm cell. It cannot be fertilized by another. The dna of a child *only* comes from one egg of the mother and one sperm of the father. If we presumed this theory to be true, then pregnancy success rate should be at nearly 100% because apparently an unlimited number of sperm cells can attach to an infinite number of ovum. I know that this isn't the argument presented here, but I have seen this argument put forth before as well. My other dissertation should be proof enough for why gametes entering a fetus is physically impossible.
Actual science: promiscuity leads to higher divorce rates. And the obvious, promiscuity leads to more diseases. Spouting off a bunch of horseshit that is fake and retarded makes the entire argument against something appear to be entirely in bad faith and based on bunk science and quackery.
Male microchimerism is real, but it comes from other sources of cells that are not gametes. Blood transfusions, organ donations, sharing needles (for junkies), things like that. Things that cross contaminate cells that can actually survive and reproduce, and even then it isnt a guarantee, because the immune system still works overtime to ensure that the fetus is as safe as possible. Also, dna left behind from past fetuses in the body. Dna that got left over from a fetus before birth, miscarriage, or abortion. Theoretically possible but very improbable that the leftover dna from a past fetus will enter a new one. But, back to the point, the way that gametes work makes microchimerism via intercourse functionally impossible.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
there is a study in the book where an offspring ended up having stripes like a zebra after the animal fucked a zebra without impregnating it, and the offspring was from a different animal
The original experiment done was in the 1820s, and it was done by a guy who was trying to convince the government of Britain that he could create superior horses by crossbreeding quagga (now extinct zebra subspecies) with regular horses.
The mares bred with quaggas were already mated and had foals. Then the mares were paired with regular horses, which produced horses with stripes. Fetal diploid cells left behind can, in fact, "colonize" a new fetus. It's extremely rare, but it can theoretically happen. However, it would not have been the stallions themselves passing down anything because, as mentioned, it is impossible for sperm to survive for more than a week at the absolute maximum.
The later Penicuik Experiments conducted by Prof. Ewart in the 1890s were unable to replicate anything at all shown in lord mortons mare, and he concluded that the foals of lord mortons mare must have been expressing primitive markings. Primitive markings are very sparse stripes that can appear directly on top of regular horses. Based on the paintings made of lord mortons mare, that's more or less what it looked like, and Ewart was correct. It had a lot of hype around it because telegony was a popular theory of heredity at the time, but mandelian heredity has been more or less proven since then.
Most michrocimerism comes from mother -> fetus and fetus -> mother likewise. Everyone has genes "absorbed" from the mother in the womb. In rare circumstances, it's prior fetus -> new fetus (but only small amounts of dna). The only thing here that is scientifically sound is that if you have children with a single mother, the new children (can) have DNA from the first child. But, even still, it's unlikely to happen and more unlikely to be anything even remotely significant.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
The mares bred with quaggas were already mated and had foals. Then the mares were paired with regular horses, which produced horses with stripes. Fetal diploid cells left behind can, in fact, "colonize" a new fetus. It's extremely rare, but it can theoretically happen. However, it would not have been the stallions themselves passing down anything because, as mentioned, it is impossible for sperm to survive for more than a week at the absolute maximum.
The later Penicuik Experiments conducted by Prof. Ewart in the 1890s were unable to replicate anything at all shown in lord mortons mare, and he concluded that the foals of lord mortons mare must have been expressing primitive markings. Primitive markings are very sparse stripes that can appear directly on top of regular horses. Based on the paintings made of lord mortons mare, that's more or less what it looked like, and Ewart was correct. It had a lot of hype around it because telegony was a popular theory of heredity at the time, but mandelian heredity has been more or less proven since then.
Most michrocimerism comes from mother -> fetus and fetus -> mother likewise. Everyone has genes "absorbed" from the mother in the womb. In rare circumstances, it's prior fetus -> new fetus (but only small amounts of dna). The only thing here that is scientifically sound is that if you have children with a single mother, the new children (can) have DNA from the first child. But, even still, it's unlikely to happen and more unlikely to be anything even remotely significant.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
Toast message
Why? You literally said this in another comment:
>DNA doesn't exist
You're impervious to scientific reasoning. Showing you research is akin to showing a toddler calculus.
* https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0045592
* https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16084184/
Nah, try again.
* https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0045592
* https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16084184/
for example, it's very empirically replicable that women who have never had a brother, never had a male child, and then died, have been found with detectable levels of DNA from multiple unrelated males literally in their brains. where does anyone think that comes from?
abnormalities when she was in the womb (e.g. effectively absorbing an undeveloped twin) are rare but they do happen. and every child a woman has leaves a bunch of DNA behind in her (including boys). so don't count the male DNA with familial order (brother or son) common genes. where is the rest of the male DNA coming from?