Microchimerism
(media.scored.co)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
It is completely retarded to even assume that sperm can somehow, magically, find a way into the brain and live there for your entire life. Even if the sperm somehow survived and traveled to your nervous system (biologically impossible by the way), the defenses of the CNS would go absolutely apeshit about a foreign entity's sperm cells going anywhere near the brain and kill it immediately.
And even if we assumed everything else is true, and that sperm could survive forever in the female body because reasons, an egg can still only be fertilized by one sperm cell. It cannot be fertilized by another. The dna of a child *only* comes from one egg of the mother and one sperm of the father. If we presumed this theory to be true, then pregnancy success rate should be at nearly 100% because apparently an unlimited number of sperm cells can attach to an infinite number of ovum. I know that this isn't the argument presented here, but I have seen this argument put forth before as well. My other dissertation should be proof enough for why gametes entering a fetus is physically impossible.
Actual science: promiscuity leads to higher divorce rates. And the obvious, promiscuity leads to more diseases. Spouting off a bunch of horseshit that is fake and retarded makes the entire argument against something appear to be entirely in bad faith and based on bunk science and quackery.
Male microchimerism is real, but it comes from other sources of cells that are not gametes. Blood transfusions, organ donations, sharing needles (for junkies), things like that. Things that cross contaminate cells that can actually survive and reproduce, and even then it isnt a guarantee, because the immune system still works overtime to ensure that the fetus is as safe as possible. Also, dna left behind from past fetuses in the body. Dna that got left over from a fetus before birth, miscarriage, or abortion. Theoretically possible but very improbable that the leftover dna from a past fetus will enter a new one. But, back to the point, the way that gametes work makes microchimerism via intercourse functionally impossible.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
The mares bred with quaggas were already mated and had foals. Then the mares were paired with regular horses, which produced horses with stripes. Fetal diploid cells left behind can, in fact, "colonize" a new fetus. It's extremely rare, but it can theoretically happen. However, it would not have been the stallions themselves passing down anything because, as mentioned, it is impossible for sperm to survive for more than a week at the absolute maximum.
The later Penicuik Experiments conducted by Prof. Ewart in the 1890s were unable to replicate anything at all shown in lord mortons mare, and he concluded that the foals of lord mortons mare must have been expressing primitive markings. Primitive markings are very sparse stripes that can appear directly on top of regular horses. Based on the paintings made of lord mortons mare, that's more or less what it looked like, and Ewart was correct. It had a lot of hype around it because telegony was a popular theory of heredity at the time, but mandelian heredity has been more or less proven since then.
Most michrocimerism comes from mother -> fetus and fetus -> mother likewise. Everyone has genes "absorbed" from the mother in the womb. In rare circumstances, it's prior fetus -> new fetus (but only small amounts of dna). The only thing here that is scientifically sound is that if you have children with a single mother, the new children (can) have DNA from the first child. But, even still, it's unlikely to happen and more unlikely to be anything even remotely significant.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed