New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
32
Microchimerism (media.scored.co)
posted 2 days ago by Heliocentric on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +32Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
11
HarlechMan on scored.co
1 day ago 11 points (+0 / -0 / +11Score on mirror ) 2 children
Women shouldn't whore around but this is bunk. The whole idea that there is DNA that "contaminates" human offspring makes zero sense if you understand the fertilization and reproduction process of higher animals. If I recall correctly the only study that showed anything like that had to do with fruit flies.
ImBillCurtis on scored.co
1 day ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 2 children
So go ahead and publish your documented research methods disproving the research.
HerrBBQ on scored.co
1 day ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 3 children
>publish your documented research methods

Why? You literally said this in another comment:

>DNA doesn't exist

You're impervious to scientific reasoning. Showing you research is akin to showing a toddler calculus.
TallestSkil on scored.co
10 hours ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Post a link to that comment.
HerrBBQ on scored.co
7 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
It's a top level comment on this thread lol
TallestSkil on scored.co
7 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Hey, look at that. That’s stupid.
ImBillCurtis on scored.co
1 day ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
So you couldn’t do it, huh?
HarlechMan on scored.co
1 day ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
He's just babbling. "Documented research methods"...he doesn't even understand what he's saying. Reddit-tier behavoir, sad.
HarlechMan on scored.co
1 day ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
First post some research that actually shows what you're claiming, lol.
ImBillCurtis on scored.co
1 day ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 2 children
OP did, sport.
Amerikanerr on scored.co
1 day ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
None of the links work
TallestSkil on scored.co
10 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
I got you, fam.

* https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0045592
* https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16084184/
HarlechMan on scored.co
1 day ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 2 children
You just saw a link and assumed it was 1) functional and 2) actually supported what you were saying. It's OK to admit it.
TallestSkil on scored.co
10 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 3 children
>WAAA I PERSONALLY COULDN’T FIGURE OUT HOW TO DO IT THEREFORE REALITY DOESN’T EXIST

Nah, try again.

* https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0045592
* https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16084184/
ImBillCurtis on scored.co
22 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
So you couldn’t find any way to refute it still, huh?
they-see-me-trollin on scored.co
1 day ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
there are nuggets of truth to it, but a lot of it is false.

for example, it's very empirically replicable that women who have never had a brother, never had a male child, and then died, have been found with detectable levels of DNA from multiple unrelated males literally in their brains. where does anyone think that comes from?

abnormalities when she was in the womb (e.g. effectively absorbing an undeveloped twin) are rare but they do happen. and every child a woman has leaves a bunch of DNA behind in her (including boys). so don't count the male DNA with familial order (brother or son) common genes. where is the rest of the male DNA coming from?
HarlechMan on scored.co
1 day ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
That's a very good question but there are dozens of ways other cells, male or female could enter the body. Orally, nasally or other membranes. Spit, skin shed, hair, etc. Jumping to the conclusion that it's from unprotected sex is the wacky part. Heck, since it's in the brain it's far more likely to be nasally since the nasal-brain barrier is far more exposed. Not to mention the whole "sperm is diploid" thing.
Toast message