Basic Foid Loyalty test
(twitter.com)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
The very fact that she's trying to act like your mother instead of your wife means she doesn't respect you and is no good.
Is even materal behaviour, though? Should a mother (or rather, is it evolutionarily advantageous for a mother to) sacrifice herself for her children? Not if she can have more. *Maybe* if she can only have one child, but that's straining credible speculation as it is.
The maternal instinct is to get herself, and her kids, to safety while the father sacrifices. This behaviour here is girlboss BS.
At most I would want from my wife to find a weapon and sucker punch my opponent if, and only if, I couldn't subdue him myself.
I'm married actually. I've done dumb shit that could have gotten me hurt or killed a few times (mostly shortcuts at work, ill admit, when i was younger though), if she knew about it each time it happened she'd probably kill me. This is a pretty universal experience. If your wife *doesnt* bitch at you for putting yourself in danger, or *doesnt* want to tell you why what you did is retarded, then she probably doesn't care much for you at all. Because if she is worried, that means she cares. If she's not then she doesn't. If she runs to try to pull you out of harms way, she cares about you not getting hurt. Even though it might end up badly, it is not a bad thought to have.
>The maternal instinct is to get herself, and her kids, to safety while the father sacrifices. This behaviour here is girlboss BS.
The situation posited is one where there's a woman and a man with no children. That's what's shown in the video. I mean maternal instinct less in the *literal* sense of a woman looking after her children, and more in the general sense of women being overall maternal over a multitude of things that are not children. In the case you're presenting, I agree with you, but that's not what the video shows and that's not what I had in mind when I made my statement.
>is even materal behaviour, though? Should a mother (or rather, is it evolutionarily advantageous for a mother to) sacrifice herself for her children? Not if she can have more. Maybe if she can only have one child, but that's straining credible speculation as it is.
Is it evolutionarily advantageous? Absolutely not. But it's a very human thing to do and humans are good at doing things for entirely moral and not technically proficient reasons. To an animal this isn't maternal instinct at all but for a human it very much is. For a person it's Basically expected to sacrifice for your children up to and including death in extreme circumstances
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed