1 month ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
I understand ALL his noble reasoning. And if he were fighting white men ruled by white men for white men disagreements, then he would've been righteous in it.
But he wasnt. And this has been our downfall since the beginning. WE hold ourselves to a standard that no one else does, and they take advantage of that.
1 month ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
That thinking is why the jews are winning. It is magical thinking hoping that your enemies will hold themselves to your ideals and its based on a fallacy. Those controlled by your enemies are not your brothers. And you cant save them from themselves by being weak.
Has it occured to you that the *reason* Hitler wasn't Jewed was precisely because he was the kind of man that wouldn't kill his brothers? That, if he were, he would have been corrupted just as other European rulers were?
You think the Jews are winning? They have nothing they built themselves; everything they have relies on deception and the goodwill of others. Their entire existence dances on a knife edge where one wrong move destroys their earthly weath and banishes them from the countries *we* built.
You think they're winning because you assess things on a timescale of decades. *They* know they always lose because they see timescales of millenia. Jews have risen to power hundreds, thousands of times in the past, but the end result is always the same.
'My Leader, they are burning our men alive in their pillboxes with flame tanks. Would you like us to deploy the gas? - No'
Hard to imagine making that choice. Especially knowing what losing would bring, and their propaganda shows that they knew what would happen to Europe if they lost
Love for your enemy is grace.
He hoped that mercy would win in the end. He never wanted war in the first place.
But he wasnt. And this has been our downfall since the beginning. WE hold ourselves to a standard that no one else does, and they take advantage of that.
It's hard to place your faith in justice you can't control but if he *did* massacre his own brothers and then won, we'd be in the same situation.
Has it occured to you that the *reason* Hitler wasn't Jewed was precisely because he was the kind of man that wouldn't kill his brothers? That, if he were, he would have been corrupted just as other European rulers were?
You think the Jews are winning? They have nothing they built themselves; everything they have relies on deception and the goodwill of others. Their entire existence dances on a knife edge where one wrong move destroys their earthly weath and banishes them from the countries *we* built.
You think they're winning because you assess things on a timescale of decades. *They* know they always lose because they see timescales of millenia. Jews have risen to power hundreds, thousands of times in the past, but the end result is always the same.
'My Leader, they are burning our men alive in their pillboxes with flame tanks. Would you like us to deploy the gas? - No'
Hard to imagine making that choice. Especially knowing what losing would bring, and their propaganda shows that they knew what would happen to Europe if they lost