You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
IGOexiled on scored.co
1 month ago0 points(+0/-0)1 child
I don't think it helps your case to say that the capital J was promised to you 6000 years ago.
Or, from another angle: who published your textbook, from which you learned to capitalize *jew*? Was it McGraw-Hill? This is fruit of the vine of jew Epstein's whore.
Discover a real God of real capital T Truth so you don't have to participate in this nonsense.
When the founding Fathers would describe themselves they'd probably use words like Anglo-Saxon, Protestant, Puritan, American, European or any number of descriptors which are proper nouns and would have capitalization.
If you have a problem with someone it's whoever popularized Anglo-Saxons using an English word for a color to identify themselves. Colors, which are adjectives do not get capitalized per established English rules that predates even America as a country.
It happened probably because we didn't know what to call black people to describe them. Calling them African would create an un-American identity in them. Then over time "if they're black then I'm white" probably became the predominant thought as the skin colors are the furthest apart.
There was a time when "white people" didn't call themselves white.
A 1600s Englishman would call himself a Briton, or an Anglo-Saxon, not a "white man".
If you want to fix this grammatical problem then the proper way is to reclaim older terms like Anglo-Saxon, not play into black Marxist attack on language games.
Or, from another angle: who published your textbook, from which you learned to capitalize *jew*? Was it McGraw-Hill? This is fruit of the vine of jew Epstein's whore.
Discover a real God of real capital T Truth so you don't have to participate in this nonsense.
If you have a problem with someone it's whoever popularized Anglo-Saxons using an English word for a color to identify themselves. Colors, which are adjectives do not get capitalized per established English rules that predates even America as a country.
It happened probably because we didn't know what to call black people to describe them. Calling them African would create an un-American identity in them. Then over time "if they're black then I'm white" probably became the predominant thought as the skin colors are the furthest apart.
There was a time when "white people" didn't call themselves white.
A 1600s Englishman would call himself a Briton, or an Anglo-Saxon, not a "white man".
If you want to fix this grammatical problem then the proper way is to reclaim older terms like Anglo-Saxon, not play into black Marxist attack on language games.