You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
SicSemperTyrannis2 on scored.co
1 month ago0 points(+0/-0)1 child
Certainly Nazi positions changed throughout the Reich. You guys can't claim Hitler just wanted to set Jews free once you find evidence like in the OP.
Make it make sense? It's all fucked up. Capricious. Unjust.
Might be possible to trace the steps of how things changed, just don't assume every change was implemented uniformly throughout the Reich until the next change. Life was and is far more complex than that.
I think that people usually have bad morals and inconsistent standards today when discussing this. Germans had no OBLIGATION to host jews in their nation just like White Americans have no obligation to host non-Whites in our nations today. People who wag their fingers and call White people names because we hint that we don't like non-Whites in our communities are all immoral hypocrites because they do not demand any other race to do this or obligate any other race on the planet to host large numbers of a foreign race in their nations. It's a racist, hateful standard only pinned on Whites. To claim Germans not wanting jews in their nation is "fucked up, capricious or unjust" is not something I agree with. It was fucked up, capricious and unjust that any jews ever entered into Germany and ever behaved as anything but humble, gracious guests. Opposed to walking into someone else's home, saying you own the place and shitting on the floor.
> Germans had no OBLIGATION to host jews in their nation
This isn't about obligation to host. This is about the claim Hitler never wanted to kill any jews, he just wanted them all to go to Israel or someplace. Obviously it's not that simple, and truly the official narrative villainizes him and oversimplifies things to a ridiculous extent.
It's very understandable to want to know what actually happened, rejecting obvious bs. My whole point on the subject is don't reject one false official narrative just to replace it with another. WWII started in 1931 with Japan invading China, and it's really weird how that started. Hitler's military career started in 1914. While he isn't recorded as starting writing Mein Kampf until 1924 you know it came from ideas he'd had since childhood. Even ignoring all that, his preparation for war started on January 31 1933. No narrative can cover what happened til the end of WWII, it's a complex history.
> I think that people usually have bad morals and inconsistent standards today when discussing this.
Learning requires discretion to ignore all that noise that does certainly exist, and pay attention to those seeking truth. They evaluate information honestly rather than being exclusive to confirmation bias, for starters.
Make it make sense? It's all fucked up. Capricious. Unjust.
Might be possible to trace the steps of how things changed, just don't assume every change was implemented uniformly throughout the Reich until the next change. Life was and is far more complex than that.
This isn't about obligation to host. This is about the claim Hitler never wanted to kill any jews, he just wanted them all to go to Israel or someplace. Obviously it's not that simple, and truly the official narrative villainizes him and oversimplifies things to a ridiculous extent.
It's very understandable to want to know what actually happened, rejecting obvious bs. My whole point on the subject is don't reject one false official narrative just to replace it with another. WWII started in 1931 with Japan invading China, and it's really weird how that started. Hitler's military career started in 1914. While he isn't recorded as starting writing Mein Kampf until 1924 you know it came from ideas he'd had since childhood. Even ignoring all that, his preparation for war started on January 31 1933. No narrative can cover what happened til the end of WWII, it's a complex history.
> I think that people usually have bad morals and inconsistent standards today when discussing this.
Learning requires discretion to ignore all that noise that does certainly exist, and pay attention to those seeking truth. They evaluate information honestly rather than being exclusive to confirmation bias, for starters.