My personal theory on COVID is that it was a litmus test by the ruling class to determine exactly how much control they currently have over the populace.
They didn't have a specific long range intention for it, probably more like a set duration with a series of actions they wanted to attempt during that time. The shots, the lockdowns, etc. All the while, the goal was simply to gather data. Do people comply? Push back? If so, in what form? How explicitly can we program people's wills just by saying things on TV, not even wrapping it up in clever propaganda anymore? Will it work even if we're spewing blatant falsehoods?
That's why they fixated on enforcing inane shit like the masks. It was a compliance test. If they could make you stick a diaper to your face everywhere you went, and genuinely believe your life was in danger if you didn't, then there's a whole lot of other shit they'd be able to make you do later.
Despite the (partially warranted) hysteria over it on the right, I don't think the jab was strictly a mass death/sterilization shot. The reality is that the vast majority of people who took it experienced no meaningful negative side effects whatsoever, and are completely fine years later. I believe it was:
1. The centerpiece of this compliance experiment.
2. A cash grab for pharma jews.
3. Something that they knew would kill *some* people; those who were genetically compromised in such a way that their systems couldn't tolerate it. But this wasn't the primary goal, otherwise the fatalities would be way worse. It was probably looked at like "trimming the hedge." A nice little secondary benefit in managing the population.
Overall, I think this experiment was *extremely* successful. It's all but guaranteed they're going to try enacting something way worse than COVID in the coming years, using the data they gathered to make it an even more devastating psychological onslaught.
They didn't have a specific long range intention for it, probably more like a set duration with a series of actions they wanted to attempt during that time. The shots, the lockdowns, etc. All the while, the goal was simply to gather data. Do people comply? Push back? If so, in what form? How explicitly can we program people's wills just by saying things on TV, not even wrapping it up in clever propaganda anymore? Will it work even if we're spewing blatant falsehoods?
That's why they fixated on enforcing inane shit like the masks. It was a compliance test. If they could make you stick a diaper to your face everywhere you went, and genuinely believe your life was in danger if you didn't, then there's a whole lot of other shit they'd be able to make you do later.
Despite the (partially warranted) hysteria over it on the right, I don't think the jab was strictly a mass death/sterilization shot. The reality is that the vast majority of people who took it experienced no meaningful negative side effects whatsoever, and are completely fine years later. I believe it was:
1. The centerpiece of this compliance experiment.
2. A cash grab for pharma jews.
3. Something that they knew would kill *some* people; those who were genetically compromised in such a way that their systems couldn't tolerate it. But this wasn't the primary goal, otherwise the fatalities would be way worse. It was probably looked at like "trimming the hedge." A nice little secondary benefit in managing the population.
Overall, I think this experiment was *extremely* successful. It's all but guaranteed they're going to try enacting something way worse than COVID in the coming years, using the data they gathered to make it an even more devastating psychological onslaught.
>martial law in all civilized locations; no protests
>infinite currency printing and helicopter cash to everyone; no protests
Please.
If the goal was to get people used to the Great Reset, they definitely fucked up.