I know the point of constant psyops is to keep the populace to always argue rather than identify kikes as the problem, but what ones do you think failed at their ideal goal?
I think COVID failed. I think it was supposed to go on longer. If the vaccine actually worked it may have succeeded. Too many people were against COVID after finding out the vaccine wasnt effective rather than the principle of what was happening.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
1 month ago0 points(+0/-0)1 child
Excellent take, but I'm still not convinced that we've seen a fraction of the effects of the jabs.
What we've seen so far is the effects of failures in processing (hence why it's specific batch numbers). If the jabs *did* immediately injure everyone who took them, everyone would stop taking them, assuming they aren't actually pulled.
For maximum harm, they need to look at least benign until 80% coverage is reached. Then you start to see effects years later, at a statistical level.
We're *just* at the point where the mid-term effects will be manifesting. Have they already started? It's totally possible that the medical establishment is actively obfuscating any and all links between side effects and the vaxx. I fell it'll always be a matter of what people want to believe, rather than proof, at least for the next decade or so.
While you can say anything is theoretically *possible,* I find the notion of the vaccine being a decade-long time bomb to be implausible, based on what we know about it and how the system handled it over time.
The "acute" effects of the vaccine only stay in your system for days to weeks, and nearly everyone who got seriously fucked by a heart attack, miscarriage, etc, all had it happen within that window. What persists in your system is "immune memory." Currently, the notion that this immune memory (which isn't a bodily function unique to the COVID vax) is secretly waiting to trigger and maim a bunch of people years and years later veers into tinfoil hat territory without hard proof. Especially because this memory gets *weaker* over time, not the reverse.
The biggest thing that I think supports this is the fact that they pushed *boosters* so hard. If they just had to plant it in your system once for the inevitable doom to later unfold, they'd try to get as many as possible on the initial wave and then bury it from memory ASAP. But it seems the vaccine actually functioned like a sort of Russian roulette, where if you got jabbed and survived the immediate aftermath, you were in the clear. So they introduced boosters for people retarded enough to take it multiple times, because every time they took it, they were spinning the barrel and pulling that trigger again. It was an extremely low-effort way to sell even more shots and pad the death toll a bit more.
Imo, this all points to the vaccine being a flash in the pan phenomenon. Probably a prototype for something later. Something much more openly "mark of the beast"-like.
What we've seen so far is the effects of failures in processing (hence why it's specific batch numbers). If the jabs *did* immediately injure everyone who took them, everyone would stop taking them, assuming they aren't actually pulled.
For maximum harm, they need to look at least benign until 80% coverage is reached. Then you start to see effects years later, at a statistical level.
We're *just* at the point where the mid-term effects will be manifesting. Have they already started? It's totally possible that the medical establishment is actively obfuscating any and all links between side effects and the vaxx. I fell it'll always be a matter of what people want to believe, rather than proof, at least for the next decade or so.
The "acute" effects of the vaccine only stay in your system for days to weeks, and nearly everyone who got seriously fucked by a heart attack, miscarriage, etc, all had it happen within that window. What persists in your system is "immune memory." Currently, the notion that this immune memory (which isn't a bodily function unique to the COVID vax) is secretly waiting to trigger and maim a bunch of people years and years later veers into tinfoil hat territory without hard proof. Especially because this memory gets *weaker* over time, not the reverse.
The biggest thing that I think supports this is the fact that they pushed *boosters* so hard. If they just had to plant it in your system once for the inevitable doom to later unfold, they'd try to get as many as possible on the initial wave and then bury it from memory ASAP. But it seems the vaccine actually functioned like a sort of Russian roulette, where if you got jabbed and survived the immediate aftermath, you were in the clear. So they introduced boosters for people retarded enough to take it multiple times, because every time they took it, they were spinning the barrel and pulling that trigger again. It was an extremely low-effort way to sell even more shots and pad the death toll a bit more.
Imo, this all points to the vaccine being a flash in the pan phenomenon. Probably a prototype for something later. Something much more openly "mark of the beast"-like.