I know the point of constant psyops is to keep the populace to always argue rather than identify kikes as the problem, but what ones do you think failed at their ideal goal?
I think COVID failed. I think it was supposed to go on longer. If the vaccine actually worked it may have succeeded. Too many people were against COVID after finding out the vaccine wasnt effective rather than the principle of what was happening.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
7
Breadpilled on scored.co
1 month ago7 points(+0/-0/+7Score on mirror)3 children
My personal theory on COVID is that it was a litmus test by the ruling class to determine exactly how much control they currently have over the populace.
They didn't have a specific long range intention for it, probably more like a set duration with a series of actions they wanted to attempt during that time. The shots, the lockdowns, etc. All the while, the goal was simply to gather data. Do people comply? Push back? If so, in what form? How explicitly can we program people's wills just by saying things on TV, not even wrapping it up in clever propaganda anymore? Will it work even if we're spewing blatant falsehoods?
That's why they fixated on enforcing inane shit like the masks. It was a compliance test. If they could make you stick a diaper to your face everywhere you went, and genuinely believe your life was in danger if you didn't, then there's a whole lot of other shit they'd be able to make you do later.
Despite the (partially warranted) hysteria over it on the right, I don't think the jab was strictly a mass death/sterilization shot. The reality is that the vast majority of people who took it experienced no meaningful negative side effects whatsoever, and are completely fine years later. I believe it was:
1. The centerpiece of this compliance experiment.
2. A cash grab for pharma jews.
3. Something that they knew would kill *some* people; those who were genetically compromised in such a way that their systems couldn't tolerate it. But this wasn't the primary goal, otherwise the fatalities would be way worse. It was probably looked at like "trimming the hedge." A nice little secondary benefit in managing the population.
Overall, I think this experiment was *extremely* successful. It's all but guaranteed they're going to try enacting something way worse than COVID in the coming years, using the data they gathered to make it an even more devastating psychological onslaught.
I think you have a valid assessment. Id like to believe people learned. I only know one dude who regrets taking the shot (or at least willingly admits it) and complying all the time. Id like to believe there are more like him out there. But I dont know
And I think whether you agree with this theory or not - whether you think it was deliberate or not - they still have that information about the populace and will no doubt use it.
I think another thing it could have been an experiment for is "Voodoo Death". Just imagine how powerful something like this could be if promoted by all of television and the internet (in much the way Covid or Trans-Sexualism was/is): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voodoo_death
"In 1992, another scientist—Clifton K. Meador, MD—discussed the case of a man diagnosed with cancer who, along with his physicians and family, believed he was dying of cancer. In the autopsy after his death, however, the doctors discovered that his cancer was not at all the cause of his death. Meador deduces that the man's belief in his imminent death was the cause of his death itself."
Excellent take, but I'm still not convinced that we've seen a fraction of the effects of the jabs.
What we've seen so far is the effects of failures in processing (hence why it's specific batch numbers). If the jabs *did* immediately injure everyone who took them, everyone would stop taking them, assuming they aren't actually pulled.
For maximum harm, they need to look at least benign until 80% coverage is reached. Then you start to see effects years later, at a statistical level.
We're *just* at the point where the mid-term effects will be manifesting. Have they already started? It's totally possible that the medical establishment is actively obfuscating any and all links between side effects and the vaxx. I fell it'll always be a matter of what people want to believe, rather than proof, at least for the next decade or so.
While you can say anything is theoretically *possible,* I find the notion of the vaccine being a decade-long time bomb to be implausible, based on what we know about it and how the system handled it over time.
The "acute" effects of the vaccine only stay in your system for days to weeks, and nearly everyone who got seriously fucked by a heart attack, miscarriage, etc, all had it happen within that window. What persists in your system is "immune memory." Currently, the notion that this immune memory (which isn't a bodily function unique to the COVID vax) is secretly waiting to trigger and maim a bunch of people years and years later veers into tinfoil hat territory without hard proof. Especially because this memory gets *weaker* over time, not the reverse.
The biggest thing that I think supports this is the fact that they pushed *boosters* so hard. If they just had to plant it in your system once for the inevitable doom to later unfold, they'd try to get as many as possible on the initial wave and then bury it from memory ASAP. But it seems the vaccine actually functioned like a sort of Russian roulette, where if you got jabbed and survived the immediate aftermath, you were in the clear. So they introduced boosters for people retarded enough to take it multiple times, because every time they took it, they were spinning the barrel and pulling that trigger again. It was an extremely low-effort way to sell even more shots and pad the death toll a bit more.
Imo, this all points to the vaccine being a flash in the pan phenomenon. Probably a prototype for something later. Something much more openly "mark of the beast"-like.
They didn't have a specific long range intention for it, probably more like a set duration with a series of actions they wanted to attempt during that time. The shots, the lockdowns, etc. All the while, the goal was simply to gather data. Do people comply? Push back? If so, in what form? How explicitly can we program people's wills just by saying things on TV, not even wrapping it up in clever propaganda anymore? Will it work even if we're spewing blatant falsehoods?
That's why they fixated on enforcing inane shit like the masks. It was a compliance test. If they could make you stick a diaper to your face everywhere you went, and genuinely believe your life was in danger if you didn't, then there's a whole lot of other shit they'd be able to make you do later.
Despite the (partially warranted) hysteria over it on the right, I don't think the jab was strictly a mass death/sterilization shot. The reality is that the vast majority of people who took it experienced no meaningful negative side effects whatsoever, and are completely fine years later. I believe it was:
1. The centerpiece of this compliance experiment.
2. A cash grab for pharma jews.
3. Something that they knew would kill *some* people; those who were genetically compromised in such a way that their systems couldn't tolerate it. But this wasn't the primary goal, otherwise the fatalities would be way worse. It was probably looked at like "trimming the hedge." A nice little secondary benefit in managing the population.
Overall, I think this experiment was *extremely* successful. It's all but guaranteed they're going to try enacting something way worse than COVID in the coming years, using the data they gathered to make it an even more devastating psychological onslaught.
I think another thing it could have been an experiment for is "Voodoo Death". Just imagine how powerful something like this could be if promoted by all of television and the internet (in much the way Covid or Trans-Sexualism was/is): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voodoo_death
"In 1992, another scientist—Clifton K. Meador, MD—discussed the case of a man diagnosed with cancer who, along with his physicians and family, believed he was dying of cancer. In the autopsy after his death, however, the doctors discovered that his cancer was not at all the cause of his death. Meador deduces that the man's belief in his imminent death was the cause of his death itself."
What we've seen so far is the effects of failures in processing (hence why it's specific batch numbers). If the jabs *did* immediately injure everyone who took them, everyone would stop taking them, assuming they aren't actually pulled.
For maximum harm, they need to look at least benign until 80% coverage is reached. Then you start to see effects years later, at a statistical level.
We're *just* at the point where the mid-term effects will be manifesting. Have they already started? It's totally possible that the medical establishment is actively obfuscating any and all links between side effects and the vaxx. I fell it'll always be a matter of what people want to believe, rather than proof, at least for the next decade or so.
The "acute" effects of the vaccine only stay in your system for days to weeks, and nearly everyone who got seriously fucked by a heart attack, miscarriage, etc, all had it happen within that window. What persists in your system is "immune memory." Currently, the notion that this immune memory (which isn't a bodily function unique to the COVID vax) is secretly waiting to trigger and maim a bunch of people years and years later veers into tinfoil hat territory without hard proof. Especially because this memory gets *weaker* over time, not the reverse.
The biggest thing that I think supports this is the fact that they pushed *boosters* so hard. If they just had to plant it in your system once for the inevitable doom to later unfold, they'd try to get as many as possible on the initial wave and then bury it from memory ASAP. But it seems the vaccine actually functioned like a sort of Russian roulette, where if you got jabbed and survived the immediate aftermath, you were in the clear. So they introduced boosters for people retarded enough to take it multiple times, because every time they took it, they were spinning the barrel and pulling that trigger again. It was an extremely low-effort way to sell even more shots and pad the death toll a bit more.
Imo, this all points to the vaccine being a flash in the pan phenomenon. Probably a prototype for something later. Something much more openly "mark of the beast"-like.