Characterizing Thomas Sewell as a "neo nazi skinhead stereotype" confirms my reservations about this hand rubbing three month old kike nigger faggot account.... that posts dozens of horse shit threads a day.
You are getting ovened.
You are getting ovened.
They're largely missing the point. Although nobody is really as good at propaganda as hitler, mussolini, the strassers, etc. So they can be somewhat forgiven. Hitler did not get popular by infiltrating KPD meetings and getting into heated arguments with leftists (though there was some of that). Hitler got popular because many leftists agreed with him, many conservatives agreed with him. His opponents agreed with what he had to say and joined his party. There was something there for everyone. And he tailored the propaganda (and I'm not using the word propaganda in a negative way) *to* everyone, while still actually believing in those things and seeing them through (mostly. There was definitely some political contention within the NSDAP, but that's bound to happen)
Groups like patriot front have little chance of actually seeing any movement through to the end because they're hyperfocused onto one tiny sliver a political subculture. This political subculture did not exist in 1920s Germany, the NSDAP had to make it themselves. We will, effectively, have to make it ourselves once again.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
Modern propaganda was new at the time, and the populations were almost entirely ignorant of what it was and how it worked. Try the stuff they did you'll get nowhere fast.
> Hitler got popular because many leftists agreed with him, many conservatives agreed with him.
Despite all the negative history on him, the reality is this: Hitler was the most kind and gentle politician of his era. He was ruthlessly attacked and he had to defend himself for it. His message was one of peace and love. It wasn't so much that he had carefully chosen a set of positions to appeal to everyone, it was that he appealed to the German spirit, the human soul, everyone's natural yearning for a better life where everyone gets along and works together for the good of their neighbors.
When I read Hitler's speeches, he doesn't do the "us vs. them" stuff nearly as much as people say. He's always talking about promoting good things and denouncing bad things, about building up families and children and creating a safe and happy environment where people can just live out their lives. When he does get angry it's when other people are murdering or ruining people's lives, and he appears very genuine in his desire to protect the weak and the forgotten. Even then, he is very adamant about "giving peace a chance" so to speak, and he extends the olive branch time and again whenever it possibly can be extended.
I remain skeptical about PF but I also remain hopeful. As people wake up to the awful situation we are in, they either come to the conclusion that we must flee and rebuild society in the wilderness (where? There is nowhere!) or we must fight to protect what little of society we have left. PF could be the nexus for our "last stand". At the very least, it's a model of what does and doesn't work, so PF v2 can do a little better.
I'm of a mind to disagree. Watch a hitler speech in English, go a step further and read the comments to gage people's opinions on it. If you said (almost) exactly all of the things hitler said again, with the same fervor, and without modern political biases, you would get just about everyone supporting you. People are people, and most people want what they think is best for the country (even if what they think will achieve that is *completely* wrong). The thing about hitler is that he spoke in the interests of every German, so he annihilated the left-right political divide and was recruiting far right monarchists and adamant communists alike into his ranks, because both the far right monarchists and adamant communists believed that their systems were good for Germany. Hitler came along with a better plan than either, and so they went with hitler.
Of course, the NSDAP ended up with its own left-right political divide, this is known. But either way you slice it, at the end of the day both the left-NSDAP and the right-NSDAP were entirely against the jews and entirely aware of the jewish problem, and both would have led Germany to New heights because both knew how to tackle the issues at hand. The methods were just different. And the way that they won was by not letting this divide fizz up until after the elections, which is an important thing to keep in mind.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed