We couldn't trust what we saw before (Once we looked into it), AI just tips the hand a little easier and makes everything shown to us held to a higher state of scrutiny :)
> The old adage is that government has the technology about 20 years before the public gets it.
The idea is correct, and government ran 'influence bots', the proper (government) name for political chatbots, can famously be attributed to overturning America's once-staunch aversion to seasonal 'vaccines'.
> Anyway, 9/11 was pretty crazy.
AI/ML wasn't involved in 9/11 or the coverup in any way.
Even Assange's famously 'odd' proof of life video from the mid 2010s still had his lapel morphing into his shirt.
Ai/ml has been involved with generating a lot of planning and ops. Imagine grok train/embedded on geopolitical takeover and queried daily by every 17C. It makes the dots and helps connect them.
I did not mean to imply that the building collapse was photoshopped.
> Ai/ml has been involved with generating a lot of planning and ops.
Why do you think so?
It is tough to prove either way, but we have some basic information we can use to rule this out before a certain time. For example, Twitter was created to provide a corpus for language models, and eventually a testbed for these bots.
The reason for the short 140 character limit? Short context length of early bots - the KV cache still costs memory, and the compute to train the bots you are suggesting didn't exist in 2009 (hence why early bots just argued) and certainly didn't in 2001. Amazon was created to provide the compute for these bots (coming from an early investor call recording - Amazon AWS is the reason Amazon exists) and AWS didn't even begin to exist until 2006.
That might be possible now, but anything done in 2001 would have been just good-old manual kikery.
This is obviously another Fast n' Furious heist being filmed.
Anyway, 9/11 was pretty crazy.
The idea is correct, and government ran 'influence bots', the proper (government) name for political chatbots, can famously be attributed to overturning America's once-staunch aversion to seasonal 'vaccines'.
> Anyway, 9/11 was pretty crazy.
AI/ML wasn't involved in 9/11 or the coverup in any way.
Even Assange's famously 'odd' proof of life video from the mid 2010s still had his lapel morphing into his shirt.
I did not mean to imply that the building collapse was photoshopped.
Why do you think so?
It is tough to prove either way, but we have some basic information we can use to rule this out before a certain time. For example, Twitter was created to provide a corpus for language models, and eventually a testbed for these bots.
The reason for the short 140 character limit? Short context length of early bots - the KV cache still costs memory, and the compute to train the bots you are suggesting didn't exist in 2009 (hence why early bots just argued) and certainly didn't in 2001. Amazon was created to provide the compute for these bots (coming from an early investor call recording - Amazon AWS is the reason Amazon exists) and AWS didn't even begin to exist until 2006.
That might be possible now, but anything done in 2001 would have been just good-old manual kikery.