> The old adage is that government has the technology about 20 years before the public gets it.
The idea is correct, and government ran 'influence bots', the proper (government) name for political chatbots, can famously be attributed to overturning America's once-staunch aversion to seasonal 'vaccines'.
> Anyway, 9/11 was pretty crazy.
AI/ML wasn't involved in 9/11 or the coverup in any way.
Even Assange's famously 'odd' proof of life video from the mid 2010s still had his lapel morphing into his shirt.
Ai/ml has been involved with generating a lot of planning and ops. Imagine grok train/embedded on geopolitical takeover and queried daily by every 17C. It makes the dots and helps connect them.
I did not mean to imply that the building collapse was photoshopped.
> Ai/ml has been involved with generating a lot of planning and ops.
Why do you think so?
It is tough to prove either way, but we have some basic information we can use to rule this out before a certain time. For example, Twitter was created to provide a corpus for language models, and eventually a testbed for these bots.
The reason for the short 140 character limit? Short context length of early bots - the KV cache still costs memory, and the compute to train the bots you are suggesting didn't exist in 2009 (hence why early bots just argued) and certainly didn't in 2001. Amazon was created to provide the compute for these bots (coming from an early investor call recording - Amazon AWS is the reason Amazon exists) and AWS didn't even begin to exist until 2006.
That might be possible now, but anything done in 2001 would have been just good-old manual kikery.
Well yes they were looking for ways to do it in 1922 (Public Opinion - Lippmann) without any technology.
Stable Diffusion isn't much more than averaging and adding probabilities. I'd say that 1956 Dartmouth, John McCarthy made it evident it was an aim.
In a more "its the aliens" way, we can see remnants of the idea from ancient civilizations-- the reading of tea leaves or of bones. Gematria in the Hebe language, the scriptures as interpetable machine code. It's no surprise that occasionally the technology resurfaces. Witchcraft, sorcery, parallel compute.
If I am successfully reading between the lines of what you are saying, I might have actually been the originator of that idea.
Yes, 'those who call themselves jews but are not' are in fact the modern branding of a long line of wanna-be shamans, who have attempted to 'divine' (with all irony) from all forms of unknowable noise or chaos (there is a requirement in their belief that the noise must not be understandable - complete unreasonable chaos, and that the universe will reveal her secrets to them through the noise.
You are right that their current fancy is language models for precisely that reason, and in reverse chronological order, they have also attempted to divine from automata (most notably steam-powered dolls with detailed articulation) and, going back to the times of alchemy, when science was still kept by the Persians, from homunculi (the original wizard or genie in a flask).
I'd written about this on old Voat.
Still, the technology didn't exist in 2001, and I'm not blindly basing this claim on official sources - if you know what to look for, you can actually tell what these 'jews' are currently up to by the signatures they leave behind (i.e. how we can tell when they first got the first LLMs up, when they first got training compute for larger models up, etc).
Anyway, 9/11 was pretty crazy.
The idea is correct, and government ran 'influence bots', the proper (government) name for political chatbots, can famously be attributed to overturning America's once-staunch aversion to seasonal 'vaccines'.
> Anyway, 9/11 was pretty crazy.
AI/ML wasn't involved in 9/11 or the coverup in any way.
Even Assange's famously 'odd' proof of life video from the mid 2010s still had his lapel morphing into his shirt.
I did not mean to imply that the building collapse was photoshopped.
Why do you think so?
It is tough to prove either way, but we have some basic information we can use to rule this out before a certain time. For example, Twitter was created to provide a corpus for language models, and eventually a testbed for these bots.
The reason for the short 140 character limit? Short context length of early bots - the KV cache still costs memory, and the compute to train the bots you are suggesting didn't exist in 2009 (hence why early bots just argued) and certainly didn't in 2001. Amazon was created to provide the compute for these bots (coming from an early investor call recording - Amazon AWS is the reason Amazon exists) and AWS didn't even begin to exist until 2006.
That might be possible now, but anything done in 2001 would have been just good-old manual kikery.
Stable Diffusion isn't much more than averaging and adding probabilities. I'd say that 1956 Dartmouth, John McCarthy made it evident it was an aim.
In a more "its the aliens" way, we can see remnants of the idea from ancient civilizations-- the reading of tea leaves or of bones. Gematria in the Hebe language, the scriptures as interpetable machine code. It's no surprise that occasionally the technology resurfaces. Witchcraft, sorcery, parallel compute.
Yes, 'those who call themselves jews but are not' are in fact the modern branding of a long line of wanna-be shamans, who have attempted to 'divine' (with all irony) from all forms of unknowable noise or chaos (there is a requirement in their belief that the noise must not be understandable - complete unreasonable chaos, and that the universe will reveal her secrets to them through the noise.
You are right that their current fancy is language models for precisely that reason, and in reverse chronological order, they have also attempted to divine from automata (most notably steam-powered dolls with detailed articulation) and, going back to the times of alchemy, when science was still kept by the Persians, from homunculi (the original wizard or genie in a flask).
I'd written about this on old Voat.
Still, the technology didn't exist in 2001, and I'm not blindly basing this claim on official sources - if you know what to look for, you can actually tell what these 'jews' are currently up to by the signatures they leave behind (i.e. how we can tell when they first got the first LLMs up, when they first got training compute for larger models up, etc).