Consume Product

>They are smart.

I disagree.

Kikes are not smarter than any other undiagnosed disease or pedophile in a trusted position.

Radiation sickness didn't outsmart Marie Curie.

A late stage diagnosis of prostate cancer didn't outsmart Scott Adams.

Kikes only get their way because they are rodent-like in their filthy shamelessness and because most humans underestimate how disgusting and subversive they are.

Spiritual bankruptcy gives the jew an advantage that healthy humans would never want.

"muh heckin bible!"

"there are god fearing jews too!"

retarded Christcucks thinking that retarded penis clippers are anything but satanic subhuman sand niggers who infilterate every fucking country they trespass upon

Billy Graham really was gutless. He could have called them out. He could have been more even-handed rather than pushing them as "god's chosen people". He knew, but "had no way to handle em"...smh. Pathetic. Just another part of the problem.

Calling jews smart is like calling a parasite smart because they live by feeding on the host and can be difficult to remove.

Jews only appear smart because they're like a parasite but that doesn't mean they're actually smart.

A jew is like an LLM. They're good at saying what they think you want to hear in order to get the result they want but there's not much thinking going on up in their brain. They're very similar to WOMEN in this regard. At first glance it seems like intelligence but it's really not much different than a well-programmed NPC with 0 intelligence.

McCarthy was taking care of them... Maybe time for McCarthyism II

Was Nixon really on our side? Was he the last good president of the United States?

Nixon, probably the only American president that I would have liked on a purely personal level. One out of fourty-six. The many Nixon tapes show that this man was far more 'based' than he was really letting on.

However, I don't like any of them on a political level: Nixon compartmentalized a lot of his Rightist views instead of governing on them. Consequently, I don't find him worthy of political admiration. One thing is for certain, he was better than the still much-vaunted Reagan.

Unfortunately, Nixon was still duped by some yids whom he wrongly saw as good, such as the widely despised Kissinger, that enemy of the Whites in southern Africa, without whom Rhodesia and South Africa could have held on for longer.

> [A backlash against yids] is going to happen in America if [yids] don't start behaving.

There are numerous reasons why it still hasn't some fifty years later. 'The media' mentioned later is one of them, whereas in more 'anti-semitic' times the media was nowhere near as centralized, rendering it impossible to bring about a situation in which you could effectively beam into people's absorbant, passive, uncritical minds whatever you want. No way to give feedback, no way to push back against the contents of the transmission. Such a marvellous indoctrination tool! Television, that creation of the goyim, inadvertently and very easily became one the greatest weapons of the yids.

> They are smart

When you are in a position of strength over them, as were the kings of Europe, and as no one is at present, they will flatter you with gifts, wealth, praise, sophistry, and all the rest of it.

The rulers soon come to favour them because they *appear*, by means of such sycophancy, to be wealthy, smart, and beneficial. 'Of course they are smart, they agree with everything that I am doing, they make me and my state wealthier and more powerful.'

Soon, they are marrying in to the political classes (only an utter fool would think it coincidental that Kamala, Ivanka, Hunter Biden, and Chelsea Clinton are all married to yids, or that both Prime Minister Starmer and deputy opposition leader Jenrick both have yid wives), buying their way into politics (e.g. winning auctions for House of Lords seats in Britain), and controlling and managing every institution that is beneficial for them that they can.

Then the mask comes off, they are no longer flattering the rulers, because they no longer need them. Now the rulers *fear* them more than anything.

Listen to Nixon's words near the end. Effectively, no one can know what we know about the yids because it will destroy us, your religious status and my political career both. And we certainly can't do anything about it for the same reasons.

Thus instead of inciting delight and joy in the rulers as they are more wont to do initially, they later incite fear, worry, and trepidation in them. Of course, if they aren't aware of the Yiddish Problem, as seems to be the case for all of those post-Nixon, the rulers, like Biden and Trump, are serving the yids enthusiastically rather than begrudgingly.

In a speech, Biden even admitted the sheer amount of change that yids were responsible for in America. The yids obviously condemned him for drawing attention to such facts, despite Biden's value-judgement of said change being glowingly positive.

The yids love to puppetize the likes of Biden and Trump because those advanced in age and on the brink of death make excellent figureheads: few would suspect foul play if such men were to die tomorrow, because it would be wholly believable. Yes, if Trump suddenly woke up to the yids, he'd very cohen-veniently die soon after, probably of 'natural causes'. Otherwise, they can dispense with him the old-fashioned way, as one suspects, upon reading the quotes attributed to JFK about Hitler, that JFK was waking up, and he didn't last long after that.

But in Trump's case, I don't think that they need to worry that that will happen, like Biden, I think that Trump, being surrounded by the likes of Adelson, Cohn, Epstein, etc. his whole life, sees yids in an overwhelmingly positive light. All of the evidence for him being an 'anti-semite', like his 2023 remark against 'liberal Jews', is flimsy. Take the 'liberal Jews' remark: if you attack 'liberal Jews', firstly, it implies that you see non-liberal yids as non-problematic. That lets all of the ones in places like Kiryas Joel off the hook. Furthermore, no actual 'anti-semite' is going to waste time diffentiating between yids as though there are 'good' and 'bad' yids. That's simply making a distinction without a difference: they are *all* bad, and if there are some who appear 'good', it is only so because of ignorance: it is merely the case that you do not know the 'good' ones as well as you think that you do, and have been fooled by their sophistry, such as a Nietzsche, a Sartre, or some other over-rated philo-semite.

Did not Trump say that, though he does not know if he has 'Jewish' ancestry, he would be thrilled to learn that he had it? He is competing with Javier Milei for the dubious distinction of being the biggest yid bootlicker. They aren't just licking those boots, those boots are down in their stomachs being digested. It is a bitter irony that yids overwhelmingly vote against, and generally dislike, the two heads of state most approving of them.

But yids, in their infinite paranoia, found the 'liberal Jews' remark too close to home: they obviously thought that he should only say 'liberals' and that 'liberal Jews' is still calling them out, because, after all, anything short of total, unconditional acceptance of the yids is 'anti-semitism'. Thus, 'liberal Jews' is 'anti-semitic' because there is a small possibility that the person who says it is waking up, and that is strictly forbidden. For they have to nip even the remotest inkling of 'anti-semitism' in the bud: recognition of the Yiddish Problem is the first step to solving it, and those who do not make that first step can never solve it. After all, how does one solve a problem that one does not even know exists?

The yid understands the goy much more than the goy understands the yid or even himself: the yid has had millennia to learn how to press the buttons of the goyim, to get him to do his bidding. The goy, by contrast, still largely remains clueless, for he greatly outnumbers the yid and thus has had little exposure to him until recent times. Things may only be slowly changing because of a new confluence of factors, for instance, knowledge of the yid is becoming universal: so long as someone has internet access, it is not long before he comes across such things as Epstein's Island and the Gaza genocide, and the arguments and infographics of the 'anti-semites'. Thus I have even seen Nigerians online praising Hitler and engaging in 'anti-semitism', something probably unheard of before the internet made it possible.

“Remnants of God’s people” my ass. There were no ‘Jews’. Whoever we have today are not “jews”. Whoever the House of Israel was, it’s not “jews”, etc.