New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
To start, I've always subscribed to the Low T is a problem "faction". I'd be taking supplements, going to the gym, eating red meat (carnivore dieting), etc... to up my T levels. I always imagined it was a problem but I've never had evidence to decide just how much of a problem it was until now.

I started injecting Testosterone. I wasn't cycling (traditional steroids) though it was borderline. Instead, I just took enough that would lead to roughly 1200 ng/dl. Now, society says this is peak teenage levels of T (currently) but some research I've done suggests this was what the average man once had in the past (before soyciety took over).

Either way, I was compelled to make this topic because I've done it twice now over the last couple months and the difference is unbelievable. Depression? Gone. My reflexes are better, my alertness is higher, my thinking is clearer, my balance is better, my motivation is higher, my sex drive is higher (but it's the complete opposite of a gooner sex drive. This isn't a simp, women control me, sex drive. This is a, I want to fuck and I'll take what I want, sex drive,), my recovery from working out is better, my strength is higher and my endurance is better. It's a night-and-day difference too. This isn't some subtle supplement difference. This is like I injected heroin but instead of losing myself in my own world, I am ready to face this world.

Whatever the conspiracy is, it's no wonder they want men with lower T levels. I feel like I would be better at anything I did and far more focused and motivated at doing it. I think most of our problems would vanish if every White man's T levels increased.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
-1
ImBillCurtis on scored.co
1 month ago -1 points (+0 / -0 / -1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Thats cool. So can you show me the experiment where they put a human body in a bomb calorimeter to verify this?
whatlike_withacloth on scored.co
1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
These stupid 1-line replies make me think you're an engagement farmer/bot. But I'll go anyway.

A human body in a bomb calorimeter would expend like 7,000,000,000,000 kcals or something, because you'd be burning even the bone to ash. This is why the numbers claimed in the Holocaust are impossible. I guess I'm assuming you know how bomb calorimeters work, but rereading the question I guess that's not a reasonable assumption... anyway, that said...

Did you not get the point about gasoline in a diesel engine? Do you contest that gasoline doesn't have energy to release? Or do you contest that a diesel engine can't produce energy?

Yea sure, labeled calories might not be fully indicative of usable calories; psyllium husk (a known indigestible fiber) still has calories on the label, even though you shit basically all of it out. But the point of CICO is - all things being equal, fewer (digestible) calories in with same calories out leads to weight loss. I.e., you eat 4.5 lbs. of meat and 1 lb. of butter every day, and you're losing weigh, right? Well, if you eat 3.5 lbs. of meat and .75 lbs. of butter/day, you'll lose even more weight. That's all CICO says, and it's true. I've done it, my friends have done it, everybody's done it; if you eat the exact same things, but less of it, you'll lose weight. Works literally every time.

Don't believe it? Just try it. Even more conclusive - I bet if you consume 0 calories/day, eventually you'll waste away to nothing like every other person who's tried it before you. But sure, CICO is just a myth or doesn't matter or whatever.
-1
ImBillCurtis on scored.co
1 month ago -1 points (+0 / -0 / -1Score on mirror ) 1 child
So still no study, huh? This is really simple. None of you jewish pseudoscience advocates can actually point to foundational evidence. Go
Figure.
whatlike_withacloth on scored.co
1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Oh... you were serious? So the study where they incinerated a human body in a huge bomb calorimeter (or I guess ground up and piecemeal and feed it into a smaller one) and measured the caloric content through heat change?

No... no I must've missed that one. Here I thought you might be a serious person; upon review - you're a clown who I'm better off not interacting with (probably we'd all be better off).

Not that it matters, but bomb calorimetry is so well understood that [even undergrads run the experiments.](https://studylib.net/doc/27894900/mae337-lab-2.docx) And just like the human body, we know that bomb calorimetry is ~100% efficient (with known losses), while a diesel engine is only ~30% efficient. So the caloric values don't translate work-for-work, but they're good reference... whatever, I like to educate people, but here I am trying to educate a non-person.
ImBillCurtis on scored.co
1 month ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Still couldn’t find it, huh?
Toast message