That's not what Nick is saying here.
Now what's funny is that when it comes to what he is actually saying, he's still wrong. Or at least has a very much incomplete thesis judging from his single comment alone.
Now what's funny is that when it comes to what he is actually saying, he's still wrong. Or at least has a very much incomplete thesis judging from his single comment alone.
It's clear though; what he (or the least, we) need(s) is someone to actually take the more extreme position, and to do so in the public eye with the same or greater level of articulation.
Even if he's not compromised what are the odds that now suddenly all his views mimic the views of the ZOG elite?