It’s the lowest of low IQ takes, and instantly lets you know you’re wasting your time. I’ve heard this so many times in regards to niggers, and nigbulls it’s not even funny.
1 month ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
Saw a YouTuber put it succinctly:
That’s called “bitch think”. In a woman’s mind, if she can’t see it herself or hasn’t known about it first hand, it can’t possibly exist. Or, conversely, her experience MUST be everyone else’s
1 month ago6 points(+0/-0/+6Score on mirror)1 child
I used to hate X people due to a lifetime of experiences and pattern recognition, but recently, a X person held a door open for me, so I can't really say I hate ALL X people.
It’s funny cause they always want to jump to “hate”, and muh skin color or some other insignificant innate characteristic while ignoring everything else ON PURPOSE. In reality it’s just about survival, and stress, and general drama avoidance of things/beings that have nothing of value to offer me. Why would I get a nigger dog, when there are so many other good decent breeds with so much to offer. One of my favorite phrases/jokes now is “I am racist, and I DONT have a black friend”. 😁
1 month ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)1 child
The best quote I've heard on this recently was "the exception does not disprove the rule". Good chart and good to point this type of thing out from time to time
The exceptions prove the rule. By virtue of being exceptional they should conversely shed light on their lessers.
Examples may include but are not limited to: "I know a based black man" or "I know a jew that cannot stand jewish behavior"
Neither of these show the rest can rise above their base nature. Instead they are exceptional.
Were people to positively handle NAXALT claims they would point to the right side of the chart and exterminate it based on the evidence presented.
Instead, because the gross preponderance of people are mentally inept, we continue to witness the absolution of the left side of the chart based on the right.
“I’m supposed to ignore thousands of years of observational data because ‘you know a guy’”?