5 hours ago11 points(+0/-0/+11Score on mirror)3 children
Its still worth debating them. Leftists are terrified of debating. The goober in the original video is obviously correct, he just doesnt know how to deflect her spells and he can't debate. Worse, he became (understandably) emotional which clouded his ability to counter her.
He should have stayed calm and asked her smart, pointed questions a la Socratic method instead of being shocked. If he did this she would have looked even worse because she would have had to explain herself, which she can't.
> Her: "Well, there's no genetic difference between black and White people at all."
> Him: "If you're confident enough to say that, then could you tell me why blacks have darker skin?"
5 hours ago5 points(+0/-0/+5Score on mirror)3 children
> Its still worth debating them. Leftists are terrified of debating.
Yes. And you know what? We can make it better than ever before. Even now people who try to disagree with them weasel around and displaying cuckish empathy, just to say how sorry they are that things are not feasible that way. Let me show you how to do it right:
She: "[Diversity is our strength]"
You: "All evidence, ancient and today's knowledge speaks against it. Even if you can prove your thesis, which is impossible, it's a recipe for disaster."
She: "So what, are you going to let them starve?!"
You: "Thank you for your suggestion."
> Worse, he became (understandably) emotional which clouded his ability to counter her.
That is the mistake, and it's not understandable. It's cuckish and sheepish. Pulling on your emotions and empathy is always what they try to do. It's like exposing your weak spot to the enemy. They are weak, they have no other way than that to destroy you.
> which she can't.
Your example isn't particularly good. It's like setting traps for a weak gotcha.
Her: "Well, there's no genetic difference between black and White people at all."
Him: "The average IQ differences between blacks and Whites are extreme. We are talking about 60 to 70 vs ~100. Do you know what that means? On a large scale it means eternal technological and cultural stagnation. It means cannibalism, tribalism, primitive and irrational belief systems."
See, this way you can express information that demolishes them. Do you think they can respond to this in any form other than "HUH?!" or "that's racist!!" In that case: "Why are ignorant about this? If you were truly knowledgeable, you would have at least heard of what I say, and have counter-arguments. Or is 'I don't like to hear this, therefore I reject it' an intellectually feasible response?"
You have to CRUSH these leftists morons to dust. Use their questions as an opportunity to convey forbidden information. When you ask them, don't just cuckishly wait for them to get into a trap that barely proves anything - ask them if they are idiots by choice (in a nice way). Make them go seethe, make them look bad.
Don't try to be "fair." Be TRUTHFUL, masculine, confident, genuine. Be prepared, but don't be rigid. Do you know what I do? I LISTEN to people, and if they are telling bullshit, I call it out. I do not just wait for my turn to speak - I bring up what they said and use it against them.
3 hours ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
I just got done watching a pretty damn enjoyable show considering it was made after 2015, and one of the characters had a great take, and brought up terms I hadn’t heard in a long time about being feeders, and receivers. We have to start living with a feeder mindset, and feeding constantly at all costs. Basically stop letting other people dictate to you, and put you in their framework. In this particular discussion we’re talking about a debate with a demon who will never argue in good faith. Never answer their questions directly. Use their questions as a way to feed more information to the third party/audience.
For example, “what are you going to do, let nigger ps starve?”
You answer with how much money we waste on them in financial aid, and welfare, among other things, and how obese they are only for them to rob, rape, and murder anything, and everything under the sun all while crying out in pain as the “victims”. Then you bring up 13 poisoned M&Ms in a bad full of 100.
This is only if you have an interested third party to impart any of this on. If not, you just point, and laugh while demoralizing the demon until hopefully it FAFOs and you can just give it a pepper bath, and/or punch it in the mouth.
> This is only if you have an interested third party to impart any of this on. If not, you just point, and laugh while demoralizing the demon until hopefully it FAFOs and you can just give it a pepper bath, and/or punch it in the mouth.
Exactly!
One time I had a conversation with a jew, who tried to explain how his people just wanted to be left alone, because these oh-so evil goyim just can't stop going after them for no reason at all. I told him some things, but essentially that the time of the jew will end soon, and the next time will be the last time.
It was meant to demoralize him. But I work towards it. He was just a JIDF, saying blabla to the non-kikes.
If you are not trying to change something with your words, why are you making noise? I keep seeing this come up and it's not a failure of the left, it is a failure of the right. The right likes hearing noise. They like putting words together for no purpose.
A teacher creates sentences to affect a change (hopefully) in their students. A police officer yells "Stop!" in order to create a change in the perp's behavior. A monkey screeches or a bird calls when they see a predator to change the alert state of their family. Words are just a means of changing the environment with sound. It is the same as talking to a LLM, and always has been, since even before LLMs existed. Stop attributing mystical properties to language. It is a tool and nothing more.
>If you are not trying to change something with your words, why are you making noise
In a high trust, high intelligence society, conversation is used to reach deeper understandings of Truth. That's why speech is enshrined as a fundamental right in those societies.
Somalia doesn't need free speech because there would be no point.
>They (words) do not illuminate a mapping from mental concepts to physical reality.
Physical reality implies sound; each being within implies in (within) stru (structured) ment (mind)...few suggest words as concepts to map out the minds of many.
>words will never get us out of this
Mentally holding onto a word based DEFINITION makes one a DEAF PHONETICIAN aka one deaf to phonics (sound). Within sound one can shape...words tempt one to hold onto what others have shaped. That's idolatry and a death sentence within moving sound.
He should have stayed calm and asked her smart, pointed questions a la Socratic method instead of being shocked. If he did this she would have looked even worse because she would have had to explain herself, which she can't.
> Her: "Well, there's no genetic difference between black and White people at all."
> Him: "If you're confident enough to say that, then could you tell me why blacks have darker skin?"
Yes. And you know what? We can make it better than ever before. Even now people who try to disagree with them weasel around and displaying cuckish empathy, just to say how sorry they are that things are not feasible that way. Let me show you how to do it right:
She: "[Diversity is our strength]"
You: "All evidence, ancient and today's knowledge speaks against it. Even if you can prove your thesis, which is impossible, it's a recipe for disaster."
She: "So what, are you going to let them starve?!"
You: "Thank you for your suggestion."
> Worse, he became (understandably) emotional which clouded his ability to counter her.
That is the mistake, and it's not understandable. It's cuckish and sheepish. Pulling on your emotions and empathy is always what they try to do. It's like exposing your weak spot to the enemy. They are weak, they have no other way than that to destroy you.
> which she can't.
Your example isn't particularly good. It's like setting traps for a weak gotcha.
Her: "Well, there's no genetic difference between black and White people at all."
Him: "The average IQ differences between blacks and Whites are extreme. We are talking about 60 to 70 vs ~100. Do you know what that means? On a large scale it means eternal technological and cultural stagnation. It means cannibalism, tribalism, primitive and irrational belief systems."
See, this way you can express information that demolishes them. Do you think they can respond to this in any form other than "HUH?!" or "that's racist!!" In that case: "Why are ignorant about this? If you were truly knowledgeable, you would have at least heard of what I say, and have counter-arguments. Or is 'I don't like to hear this, therefore I reject it' an intellectually feasible response?"
You have to CRUSH these leftists morons to dust. Use their questions as an opportunity to convey forbidden information. When you ask them, don't just cuckishly wait for them to get into a trap that barely proves anything - ask them if they are idiots by choice (in a nice way). Make them go seethe, make them look bad.
Don't try to be "fair." Be TRUTHFUL, masculine, confident, genuine. Be prepared, but don't be rigid. Do you know what I do? I LISTEN to people, and if they are telling bullshit, I call it out. I do not just wait for my turn to speak - I bring up what they said and use it against them.
For example, “what are you going to do, let nigger ps starve?”
You answer with how much money we waste on them in financial aid, and welfare, among other things, and how obese they are only for them to rob, rape, and murder anything, and everything under the sun all while crying out in pain as the “victims”. Then you bring up 13 poisoned M&Ms in a bad full of 100.
This is only if you have an interested third party to impart any of this on. If not, you just point, and laugh while demoralizing the demon until hopefully it FAFOs and you can just give it a pepper bath, and/or punch it in the mouth.
Exactly!
One time I had a conversation with a jew, who tried to explain how his people just wanted to be left alone, because these oh-so evil goyim just can't stop going after them for no reason at all. I told him some things, but essentially that the time of the jew will end soon, and the next time will be the last time.
It was meant to demoralize him. But I work towards it. He was just a JIDF, saying blabla to the non-kikes.
If you can't publicly debate your opponent, no matter how unhinged, you don't actually know jack shit.